[Purpose/significance] Based on the Reciprocal Determinism Theory, this paper studies the relationship among student learning behavior, organizational environment and individual traits in the course of information retrieval in flipped classroom. [Method/process] By combing and summarizing the relevant research results, pre-survey and expert survey, behavior measurement scale is formed on students’ classroom participation. Factor analysis is used to extract the key variables, and the structural equation modeling method is used to explore the influence mechanism of individual identity, organizational guarantee, organizational identity and classroom design on learning behavior. [Result/conclusion] The findings are as follows: individual characteristics, organizational identity and organizational guarantee variables as front factors influence each other; organizational identity and individual characteristics not only directly affect classroom design, but also play an active and significant role in learning behavior through classroom design. The author thinks it is necessary to improve the information literacy of undergraduates through such measures as perfecting the supporting environment, promoting students’ independent study, optimizing classroom design and strengthening extracurricular practices.
[1] 崔京菁,马宁,余胜泉.基于社会认知网络的翻转课堂教学模式研究[J].现代教育技术,2016 (11):54-58.
[2] 赵海霞.翻转课堂环境下深度协作知识建构的策略研究[J].远程教育杂志,2015(3):11-17.
[3] 罗国锋.文献检索课SPOC混合教学模式构建与实践[J].图书馆论坛,2016,36(4):72-78.
[4] 范新民.整合移动学习的"三段九结合"创新培训模式研究[J].成人教育,2017,37(9):41-45.
[5] 赵东华.论认知负荷理论及对翻转课堂设计的效应启示[J].中国成人教育,2016(19):94-96.
[6] 陈晓红,高凡,何雪梅.融合"MOOC"课程和"翻转课堂"理念优势的信息素养教学模式构建与实践[J].图书情报工作,2016,60(6):32-37.
[7] 齐海晶,刘翔."互联网+"背景下高校信息检索课程信息化教学平台建设研究[J].情报科学,2017,35(8):108-112.
[8] 徐碧波,李添,石希. MOOC、翻转课堂和SPOC的学习动机分析及其教育启示[J].中国电化教育,2017(9):47-52,61.
[9] 邹娟娟.大数据时代教学新模式:知识传授与内化互补融合[J].江西社会科学,2017,37(4):250-256.
[10] 蒋丽丽,陈幼华.基于翻转课堂的高校信息素养教育设计研究[J].图书馆杂志,2015,34(12):23-28,76.
[11] 邵华,喻惠群.基于泛在学习资源共享平台的翻转课堂学习者个性化学习模型研究[J].教育评论,2015(7):88-92.
[12] 周娜.参与式学习视角下高校图书馆服务设计研究[J].图书馆建设,2016(1):81-86.
[13] FRANQUEIRA V N L, TUNNICLIFFE P. To flip or not to flip:a critical interpretive synthesis of flipped teaching[M]//Smart education and smart e-learning. Berlin:Springer international publishing, 2015:57-67.
[14] BANDURA A. Self-efficacy:toward a unifying theory of behavioral change[J]. Psychological review, 1977, 84(2):191-215.
[15] BANDURA A. Social foundations of thought and action:a social cognitive theory[M]. Englewood:Prentice Hall, 1986:169-171.
[16] BIRD B. Implementing entrepreneurial ideas:the case for intention[J]. Academy of management review, 1988, 13(3):442-453.
[17] 李静薇.创业教育对大学生创业意向的作用机制研究[D].天津:南开大学,2013.
[18] 蒋承,李笑秋.政策感知与大学生基层就业——基于"三元交互理论"的视角[J].北京大学教育评论,2015,13(2):47-56,188-189.
[19] 刘大军,黄甫全.知识创造视野中的三元交互学习[J].现代远程教育研究,2015(4):24-32.
[20] 金凌志,王小敏.基于三元交互决定论的博士生创新能力培养[J].高等教育研究,2011,32(4):49-53.
[21] 宁德鹏.创业教育对创业行为的影响机理研究[D].长春:吉林大学,2017.
[22] BANDURA A. The self system in reciprocal determinism[J]. American psychologist, 1978, 33(4):344-358.
[23] TAJFEL H.Social psychology of intergroup relations[J]. Annual review of psychology,1982,33:1-39.
[24] 崔京菁,马宁,余胜泉.基于社会认知网络的翻转课堂教学模式研究[J].现代教育技术,2016,26(11):54-59.
[25] 何立芳.翻转课堂教学模型及其在信息素养教育中的实证研究[J].图书情报工作,2018,62 (17):53-59.
[26] MOORE M G. Handbook of distance education[M]. London:Routledge, 2007:417-424.
[27] CHEN Y, WANG Y, CHEN N S. Is FLIP enough? or should we use the flipped model instead?[J]. Computers & education, 2014, 79:16-27.
[28] 丁永刚,金梦甜,张馨,等.基于SPOC的翻转课堂2.0教学模式设计与实施路径[J].中国电化教育,2017(6):95-101.
[29] ASHFORTH B E, MAEL F. Social identity theory and the organization[J]. Academy of management review, 1989, 14(1):20-39.
[30] DUKERICH J M, GOLDEN B R, SHORTELL S M. Beauty is in the eye of the beholder:the impact of organizational identification, identity, and image on the cooperative behaviors of physicians[J]. Administrative science quarterly, 2002, 47(3):507-533.
[31] STETS J E, BURKE P J. Identity theory and social identity theory[J]. Social psychology quarterly, 2000,63(3):224-237.
[32] POLZER J T. How subgroup interests and reputations moderate the effect of organizational identification on cooperation[J]. Journal of management, 2004, 30(1):71-96.
[33] WITT L A, KACMAR K M, CARLSON D S, et al. Interactive effects of personality and organizational politics on contextual performance[J]. Journal of organizational behavior, 2002, 23(8):911-926.
[34] EISENBERGER R, ARMELI S, REXWINKEL B, et al. Reciprocation of perceived organizational support[J]. Journal of applied psychology, 2001, 86(1):42-51.
[35] CHOW W S, CHAN L S. Social network and shared goals in organizational knowledge sharing[J]. Information and management, 2008, 45(7):458-465.
[36] AMABILE T M. The social psychology of creativity:a componential conceptualization[J]. Journal of personality and social psychology, 1983, 45(2):357-376.
[37] KRATZER J, LEENDERS R T A J, VAN ENGELEN J M L. Informal contacts and performance in innovation teams[J]. International journal of manpower, 2005, 26(6):513-528.
[38] WU C C, LEE G C. Use of BBS to facilitate a teaching practicum course[J]. Computers & education, 1999, 32(3):239-247.
[39] 陈然.社会民生网络论坛参与者发帖行为的动因探讨——基于五大中文网络社区的实证研究[J].新疆社会科学,2012(6):108-114,164.
[40] 张书维,王二平,周洁.跨情境下集群行为的动因机制[J].心理学报,2012,44(4):524-545.
[41] ANDERSON J C, GERBING D W. Structural equation modeling in practice:a review and recommended two step approach[J]. Psychological bulletin,1988,103(3):411-423.
[42] 马秀麟.翻转课堂教学模式应以学生为中心[N].中国社会科学报,2014-10-20(B02).
[43] ROEHL A, REDDY S L, SHANNON G J. The flipped classroom:an opportunity to engage millennial students through active learning[J]. Journal of family and consumer sciences, 2013, 105(2):44-49.
[44] STRAYER J F. How learning in an inverted classroom influences cooperation, innovation and task orientation[J]. Learning environments research, 2012, 15(2):171-193.
[45] 杨斌,王以宁,任建四,等.美国大学IPSP课程混合式翻转课堂分析与启示[J].中国电化教育,2015(2):118-122,128.
[46] 严文法,包雷,李彦花.国外"翻转课堂"教学模式的理论与实践探析[J].电化教育研究,2016,37(11):120-128.
[47] 刘刚.应用型大学专业课程"翻转课堂+合作学习"教学方式研究[J].中国职业技术教育,2017(17):50-53.
[48] 花明.基于任务导向的多元互动翻转课堂教学组织研究[J].职教论坛,2017(17):68-73.
