[Purpose/significance] This paper aims to further improve the theoretical research. The research results will provide the theoretical foundation and idea about developing users'information encountering ability as well as optimize service content and improving service pattern for relative service providers.[Method/process] Firstly, 30 key information encountering events of mobile Internet were collected by using semi-structural interview. Furthermore, Nvivo11 was introduced to conduct coding analysis based on Grounded Theory. After conceptualization and categorization for the relationships among free nodes, 13 tree nodes and 7 core tree nodes about information encountering process were determined.[Result/conclusion] The whole information encountering process of mobile Internet can be divided into three stages:before, in and after information encountering, which contains 7 steps, i.e., attention, start, trace, obtain, utilize, return and end. These three stages go through cognitive division, cover division and span division respectively, and then complete the sense-making of encountered information.
Tian Mei
,
Zhu Xuefang
,
Zhang Junliang
. Research on Information Encountering Process of Mobile Internet Under Sencing-making Perspective[J]. Library and Information Service, 2018
, 62(16)
: 72
-81
.
DOI: 10.13266/j.issn.0252-3116.2018.16.009
[1] WILSON T D. Human information behavior[J]. Special issue on information science research, 2000,3(2):49-56.
[2] ERDELEZ S. Information encountering:an exploration beyond information seeking[D].Syracuse:Syracuse University,1995.
[3] CUNHA M P E. Serendipity:why some organizations are luckier than others[EB/OL].[2018-07-05]. https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=882782.
[4] MCCAY-PEET L, TOMS E G. The process of serendipity in knowledge work[C]//Proceedings of the third symposium on information interaction in context. New York:ACM, 2010:377-382.
[5] RUBIN V L, BURKELL J, QUAN-HAASE A. Facets of serendipity in everyday chance encounters:a grounded theory approach to blog analysis[EB/OL].[2016-05-05]. http://www.informationr.net/ir/16-3/paper488.html.
[6] ERDELEZ S. Towards understanding information encountering on the web[C]//Proceedings of the 63rd ASIS annual meeting. Chicago:Medford NJ., 2000:363-371.
[7] 王文韬,谢阳群.信息偶遇模型回顾研究[J].图书情报工作,2014,58(21):130-135.
[8] LAWLEY J. Maximising serendipity:the art of recognizing and fostering unexpected potential-a systemic approach to change[EB/OL].[2018-07-05]. http://www.cleanlanguage.co.uk/articles/articles/224/1/Maximising-Serendipity/Page1.html.
[9] MAKRI S, BLANDFORD A. Coming across information serendipitously-Part 1[J]. Journal of documentation, 2012, 68(5):684-705.
[10] JIANG T, LIU F, CHI Y. Online information encountering:modeling the process and influencing factors[J]. Journal of documentation, 2015, 71(6):1135-1157.
[11] MCBIRNIE A. Seeking serendipity:the paradox of control[J]. ASLIB proceedings, 2008, 60(6):600-618.
[12] FLANAGAN J C. The critical incident technique[J].Psychological bulletin, 1954, 51(4):327-358.
[13] 李晶.关键事件技术——通过获取关键事件进行实证研究的有效工具[J].图书情报知识,2010(1):26-30,76.
[14] 杨丹.基于质性分析的知识工作识别与分解研究[J].图书情报工作,2010,54(24):104-107,79.
[15] 王萍,王毅,罗军,等.关键事件技术和主成分分析法在高校图书馆服务质量评价中的应用[J].情报理论与实践,2012,35(12):79-85.
[16] GREMLER D D. The critical incident technique in service research[J].Journal of service research,2004,7(1):65-89.
[17] PERREAULT W D, LEIGH L E. Reliability of nominal databased on qualitative judgments[J]. Journal of marketing research,1989,26(5).
[18] HAMBLETON R K,SWAMINATHAN H,ALGINA J, et al. Criterion-referenced testing and measurement:review of technical issues and developments[J].Review of educational research, 1978,48(1):11-22.
[19] MARTUZAV R.Applying norm-referenced and criterion -referenced measurement in education[M].Boston:Allyn and Bacon,1977:275-293.
[20] LYNN M R.Determination and quantification of content validity[J].Nursing research,1986, 35(6):382-385.
[21] POLIT D F,BECK C T,OWEN S V.Is the CVI an acceptable indicator of content validity? Appraisal and recommendations[J]. Research in nursing & health,2007,30(4):459-467.
[22] DERVIN B, FRENETTE M. Sense-making methodology:communicating communicatively with campaign audiences[C]//RICE R E, ATKIN C K. Public communication campaigns. Thousand Oaks:Sage Publications,2001:69-87.
