[Purpose/significance] Based on the scientific data, we constructed a new collaboration network and compared with cooperative network of traditional publications. By exploring the differences of the two collaboration network from the perspective of network analysis, this paper provided reference for scientific data management. [Method/process] Taking clinical science database of ClinicalTrials.gov website as an example, this paper used crawler technology to capture the metadata of traditional publication and clinical trial research. Then, based on these two kinds of metadata, this paper constructed different cooperative networks respectively. Finally, it used complex network analysis to explore these networks to compare the similarities and differences between two networks. [Result/conclusion] Scientific collaboration network extracted metadata from a scientific repository and publication could provide richer and more accurate information of collaboration than just using metadata from publications alone.This paper reveals the importance of scientific data management and open sharing.
Xu Xiaojie
,
He Lin
,
Shao Bo
. Research on Collaboration Network of Scientific Data-Taking Clinical Trial Data of ClinicalTrials.gov as an Example[J]. Library and Information Service, 2018
, 62(15)
: 83
-91
.
DOI: 10.13266/j.issn.0252-3116.2018.15.010
[1] 思想再解放改革再深入工作再抓实推动全面深化改革在新起点上实现新突破[N].人民日报,2018-01-24(1).
[2] COSTA M R, QIN J, BRATT S. Emergence of collaboration networks around large scale data repositories:a study of the genomics community using GenBank[J].Scientometrics,2016,108(1):21-40.
[3] 黄永文,张建勇,黄金霞,等.国外开放科学数据研究综述[J].现代图书情报技术,2013(5):21-27.
[4] MARCIAL L H, HEMMINGER B M. Scientific data repositories on the Web:An initial survey[J].Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology,2010,61(10):2029-2048.
[5] 张晓林.开放获取、开放知识、开放创新推动开放知识服务模式——30会聚与研究图书馆范式再转变[J].现代图书情报技术,2013(2):1-10.
[6] PILLAI B. Cyberinfrastructure essential to 21st century advances in science and engineering education & research[C]//International conference on control, automation and systems. Seoul:IEEE, 2007:71-73.
[7] HEY T. The fourth paradigm-data-intensive scientific discovery[J].Proceedings of the IEEE, 2011, 99(8):1334-1337.
[8] FANIEL I M, JACOBSEN T E. Reusing scientific data:how earthquake engineering researchers assess the reusability of colleagues' data[J].Computer supported cooperative work, 2010, 19(3):355-375.
[9] FANIEL I M, ZIMMERMAN A. Beyond the data deluge:a research agenda for large-scale data sharing and reuse[J].International journal of digital curation,2011,6(1):58-69.
[10] 傅小锋,李俊,黎建辉.国际科学数据的发展与共享[J].中国基础科学,2007,9(2):30-35.
[11] 刘闯,孙鸿烈.国际科学技术数据前沿领域发展研究[J].中国基础科学,2003, 18(1):329-333.
[12] BARABASI A L, JEONG H, NEDA Z, et al. Evolution of the social network of scientific collaborations[J]. Physica a:statistical mechanics and its Applications, 2001,311(3/4):590-614.
[13] NEWMAN M E J. Erratum:scientific collaboration networks. Ⅱ. Shortest paths, weighted networks, and centrality[J].Physical review e statistical physics plasmas fluids & related interdisciplinary topics,2006,73(3):039906.
[14] YANG H, WANG W, WU Z. Diversity-optimized cooperation on complex networks[J].Physical review e,2009,79(5):56107.
[15] ABBASI A, HOSSAIN L, LEYDESDORFF L. Betweenness centrality as a driver of preferential attachment in the evolution of research collaboration networks[J].Journal of informetrics,2012,6(3):403-412.
[16] GRIT L. What do we measure by co-authorships?[J].Research evaluation,2002,11(1):3-15.
[17] MEYER M, BHATTACHARYA S. Commonalities and differences between scholarly and technical collaboration-an exploration of co-invention and co-authorship analyses[J].Scientometrics,2004,61(3):443-456.
[18] SINGH J. Collaborative networks as determinants of knowledge diffusion patterns[J].Management science,2005,51(5):756-770.
[19] 陈晓燕. 学术数据集和WEB数据集下著者社会网络的比较研究[J]. 情报科学, 2014(5):79-84.
[20] Pajek[EB/OL].[2017-04-15].http://www.pajek.imfm.si/doku.php?id=pajek.
[21] UCINET[EB/OL].[2017-04-15].http://www.analytictech.com/ucinet/.
[22] THELWALL M, KOUSHA K. Are citations from clinical trials evidence of higher impact research? An analysis of ClinicalTrials.gov[J].Scie-ntometrics,2016,109:1-11.
[23] NEWMAN M E J. The structure of scientific collaboration networks[J].Proceedings of the national academy of sciences of the United States of America,2001,98(2):404-409.
[24] NEWMAN M E J. The structure and function of complex networks[J].2003,45(2):167-256.
[25] 王文军,袁翀. 社会科学学术论文生产力评价的新视角——C100指数的理念、构建方法及其初步测试[J].山东社会科学,2015(2):186-192.
[26] 邱均平,瞿辉.我国科研机构合作网络知识扩散研究——以"生物多样性"研究为例[J].图书情报知识,2011(6):5-11.
