Library and Information Service

Library and Information Service >

2018 , Vol. 62 >Issue 14: 81 - 90

DOI: https://doi.org/10.13266/j.issn.0252-3116.2018.14.010

An Empirical Study on the Learning Agility of Librarian Based on the Smart Service Situation

  • Chen Mang ,
  • Zhang Qingpu ,
  • Chen Jing
Expand
  • 1. Guilin University of Technology Library, Guilin 541004;
    2. School of Management, Harbin Institute of Technology, Harbin 150001;
    3. Huashang College, Guangdong University of Finance and Economics, Guangzhou 511300

Received date: 2018-02-05

  Revised date: 2018-04-22

  Online published: 2018-07-20

Fold

Abstract

[Purpose/significance] Based on the study of learning acuity, this paper explores the problems associated with the unfamiliar new situation of the intelligence service, which rapidly improves the self-quality and potential ability and thus effectively competes the new job, to provide reference for smart service development. [Method/process] By collecting 189 questionnaires from domestic "Double First-rate" colleges and universities, this paper attempts to analyze the key components of learning agility based on smart service, and its relationship with service innovation willingness and service effectiveness, which uses the method of structural equation. [Result/conclusion] Results suggest that: (1) In the context of intelligent service, the learning acuity of a librarian is composed of four key factors, such as Self-Insight(SI), Interpersonal Acumen(IA), Change Alacrity(CA) and Environmental Mindfulness(EM). (2) These factors have a significant positive correlation to service innovation intention and service effectiveness. (3) The service innovation intention has a significant positive correlation to service effectiveness. Finally, this paper makes a thorough discussion on the management of library and information services, and puts forward the corresponding countermeasures and suggestions.

Key words： smart service situation; the staff of library and information service; learning agility; structural equation; empirical research

Cite this article

Chen Mang , Zhang Qingpu , Chen Jing . An Empirical Study on the Learning Agility of Librarian Based on the Smart Service Situation[J]. Library and Information Service, 2018 , 62(14) : 81 -90 . DOI: 10.13266/j.issn.0252-3116.2018.14.010

References

[1] MAGLIO P P. Smart service systems[J]. Service science, 2014, 6(1):I-Ⅱ.
[2] BATCHELLER J. Learning agility:a critical competency[J]. AORN journal,2016,103(4):430-432.
[3] DRIES N, VANTILBORGH T, PEPERMANS R, et al. Learning agility as metacompetency:develop ability and career outcomes[J]. Gedrag & organisatie, 2008,21(4):365-385.
[4] RUTLEDGE L,LEMIRE S,HAWKS M,et al. Competency-based talent management:three perspectives in an academic library[J].Journal of library administration,2016,56(3):235-250.
[5] 徐建华,付娇.图书馆员的职业生涯开发与管理[J].中国图书馆学报,2003(1):18-21.
[6] 罗晓兰.图书馆员技术压力:变革与对策[J].图书情报工作,2016,60(3):38-45.
[7] 陈茫,周力青.图书馆员自我效能感的实证研究[J].图书馆建设,2014(11):60-63.
[8] MITCHINSON A, GERARD N M, ROLOFF K S. Learning agility:spanning the rigor-relevance divide[J]. Industrial and organizational psychology, 2012, 5(3):287-290.
[9] GOEBEL S, BASKERVILLE R. From self-discovery to learning agility in senior executives[C]//Proceedings of the 3rd international conference on engaged management scholarship. Atlanta:Social Science Electronic Publishing, 2013:19-22.
[10] 陈茫,张庆普.我国知识服务研究的演进历程知识图谱与研究态势探讨[J].情报资料工作,2018(2):80-91.
[11] HEZLETT S A, KUNCEL N R. Prioritizing the learning agility research agenda[J]. Industrial and organizational psychology, 2012, 5(3):296-301.
[12] DERUE D S, WELLMAN N. Developing leaders via experience:the role of developmental challenges, learning orientation, and feedback availability[J]. Journal of applied psychology, 2009, 94(4):859-875.
[13] BECK J W. Does learning agility vary primarily at the between-or within person level of analysis?[J].Industrial and organizational psychology, 2012, 5(3):312-315.
[14] JOHNSON R E, SCOTT B A. Learning agility requires proper action[J]. Industrial and organizational psychology, 2012, 5(3):209-312.
[15] BEDFORD C L. The role of learning agility in workplace performance and career advancement[D]. Minnesota Twin City:University of Minnesota, 2011.
[16] SMITH B C. How does learning agile business leadership differ? Exploring a revised model of the construct of learning agility in relation to executive performance[D]. New York:Columbia University, 2015.
[17] 林光明.转型时代,你的学习敏锐度还好吗?[J].清华管理评论,2016(Z1):84-90.
[18] 李伟阳,罗仕文.学习敏锐度:概念、测量、研究进展与热点争议[J].中国人力资源开发, 2017(2):62-71, 88.
[19] DRIES N, VANTILBORGH T, PEPERMANS R. The role of learning agility and career variety in the identification and development of high potential employees[J]. Personnel review, 2012, 41(3):340-358.
[20] ACRL. Task force on academic library outcomes assessment report[EB/OL].[2018-02-05]. http://www.ala.org/acrl/publications/whitepapers/taskforceacademic.
[21] 张红霞.国际图书馆服务质量评价:绩效评估与成效评估两大体系的形成与发展[J].中国图书馆学报, 2009, 35(1):78-85.
[22] 杨兰芳,陈万明,黄春荣,等.知识资源、服务创新与服务成效的关系——基于我国高校图书馆456名用户的实证研究[J]. 情报学报,2016,35(1):21-35.
[23] AITTOLA M, RYHNEN T, OJALA T. SmartLibrary-location-aware mobile library service[C]//Proceedings of the 5th international symposium on human-computer interaction with mobile devices and services. Udine:Springer-verlag, 2003:411-415.
[24] Smart libraries[DB/OL].[2018-02-05].https://smart.spydus.co.nz/cgi-bin/spydus.exe/MSGTRN/OPAC/HOME.
[25] 王世伟.略论智慧图书馆的五大关系[J].图书馆杂志,2017,36(4):4-10.
[26] 王世伟.论智慧图书馆的三大特点[J].中国图书馆学报,2012,38(6):22-28.
[27] 曾建勋.从知识服务向智慧服务延伸[J].数字图书馆论坛,2015(9):1.
[28] 燕辉,魏小盈,杨华.学科服务背景下"智慧与服务"新解读[J].图书与情报,2014(1):122-127.
[29] BANG H K, ELLINGER A E, HADJIMARCOU J, et al. Consumer concern, knowledge, belief, and attitude toward renewable energy:an application of the reasoned action theory[J]. Psychology & marketing, 2000, 17(6):449-468.
[30] MISHRA D, AKMAN I, MISHRA A. Theory of reasoned action application for green information technology acceptance[J].Computers in human behavior, 2014, 36(6):29-40.
[31] ONI A A, ONI S, MBARIKA V, et al. Empirical study of user acceptance of online political participation:integrating civic voluntarism model and theory of reasoned action[J]. Government information quarterly, 2017, 34(2):317-328.
[32] 陈姝,窦永香,张青杰.基于理性行为理论的微博用户转发行为影响因素研究[J].情报杂志, 2017, 36(11):147-152,160.
[33] 刘百灵,夏惠敏,李延晖.移动购物用户信息披露意愿影响因素的实证研究——基于公平理论和理性行为理论视角[J].情报理论与实践,2017,40(5):87-93.
[34] 胥琳佳. 品牌国际传播中消费者的态度和行为研究——基于理性行为理论(TRA)模型的实证研究[J].现代传播(中国传媒大学学报),2015,37(2):123-128.
[35] EHRLINGER J, JOHNSON K, BANNER M, et al. Why the unskilled are unaware:further explorations of (absent) self-insight among the incompetent[J].Organizational behavior and human decision processes,2008, 105(1):98-121.
[36] TSAI M T, CHEN C C, CHIN C W. Knowledge workers' interpersonal skills and innovation performance:an empirical study of taiwanese high-tech industrial workers[J].Social behavior and personality, 2010, 38(1):11-126.
[37] TREMBATH A. Change's challengers innovation and its enemies:why people resist new technologies[J]. Issues in science and technology, 2017, 33(2):94-95.
[38] JANSEN J J P, VAN DEN BOSCH FAJ, VOLBERDA H W. Exploratory innovation, exploitative innovation, and performance:effects of organizational antecedents and environmental moderators[J]. Management science, 2006, 52(11):1661-1674.
[39] PHILLIPS J M, GULLY S M. Role of goal orientation, ability, need for achievement, and locus of control in the self-efficacy and goal-setting process[J].Journal of applied psychology, 1997, 82(5):792-802.
[40] PARK J, LEE J, LEE H,et al. Exploring the impact of communication effectiveness on service quality, trust and relationship commitment in IT services[J]. International journal of information management,2012, 32(5):459-468.
[41] 杨春江,冯秋龙,田子州.变革型领导与员工任务绩效:主动性人格和领导-成员交换的作用[J]. 管理工程学报, 2015, 29(1):39-46,97.
[42] 张垒.环境对科技查新服务绩效的影响机制、路径及实证研究[J].图书馆学研究, 2016(3):85-91.
[43] 邢蕊,王国红.创业导向、创新意愿与在孵企业创新绩效——孵化环境的调节作用[J].研究与发展管理, 2015, 27(1):100-112.
[44] 吉敏,胡汉辉.创新意愿、集群供应链网络关系强度与企业创新绩效关系研究——基于常州产业集群的实证研究[J].科技管理研究,2015,35(19):165-170.
[45] LIDEN R C, SPARROWE R T, WAYNE S J. Leader-member exchange theory:the past and potential for the future[J]. Research in personnel and human resources management, 1997, 15(1):47-119.
[46] 陈茫,张庆普.大众创新视角下科技创新主体参与意愿研究[J].研究与发展管理, 2017, 29 (2):61-70.
[47] LIAO H, CHUANG A. A multilevel investigation of factors influencing employee service performance and customer outcomes[J]. Academy of management journal,2004,47(1):41-58.
[48] EICHINGER R W, LOMBARDO M M. Learning agility as a prime indicator of potential[J]. Human resource Planning, 2004, 27(4):12-15.
[49] DAI G R, KENNETH D M, TANG K Y. The role of learning agility in executive career success:the results of two field studies[J]. Journal of managerial issues, 2013, 25(2):108-131.
[50] 陈茫,唐家玉.图书馆移动知识服务的影响因素探析[J].图书馆,2017(9):25-30,60.
Options
Outlines

/

〈 〉

    Copyrights © LIS Press Co., Ltd. Reproduction is prohibited without permission.