Library and Information Service

Library and Information Service >

2018 , Vol. 62 >Issue 5: 54 - 67

DOI: https://doi.org/10.13266/j.issn.0252-3116.2018.05.007

Study on Factors that Influence Information Seeking Behavior of College Student Learning-oriented Teams: A Case of College Student Teams for Mathematical Contest in Modeling

  • Zhang Xiaotong ,
  • Li Yuelin
Expand
  • Department of Information Resources Management, Business School, Nankai University, Tianjin 300071

Received date: 2017-10-08

  Revised date: 2017-12-06

  Online published: 2018-03-05

Fold

Abstract

[Purpose/significance] By analyzing the multiple cases of college student teams, this paper probes into the factors that influence information seeking behavior of college student learning-oriented teams. It will provide empirical reference for the influential factors research on information seeking behavior of college student learning-oriented teams.[Method/process] At first, this paper collected data by the methods of participant observation, unstructured in-depth interview and critical incident technique, and analyzed these data by encoding.Secondly, it developed a preliminary theoretical framework of the factors that influence team members' information seeking behavior, and explained elements of the framework. And then, it fixed the preliminary theoretical framework and constructed a factors model that information searching behavior ofcollege students.[Result/conclusion] The results shows that information seeking behavior of college student teams for MCM is mainly influenced by three external factors, including information technology, information resources and problems of the contest, and four internal factors, including team composition, team resources, team communication, and team goals. Then, this paper expounded the connotation of each factor and its influence on the information searching behavior of the college students' mathematical modeling teams.Finally,based on the results of author's previous study, it developed a refined model of the factors which influence information-seeking behavior of college students' learning-oriented teams.

Key words： college student learning-oriented team; information seeking behavior; factor

Cite this article

Zhang Xiaotong , Li Yuelin . Study on Factors that Influence Information Seeking Behavior of College Student Learning-oriented Teams: A Case of College Student Teams for Mathematical Contest in Modeling[J]. Library and Information Service, 2018 , 62(5) : 54 -67 . DOI: 10.13266/j.issn.0252-3116.2018.05.007

References

[1] 刘念, 李茵莱. 论大学生团队合作精神的培养[J]. 西南民族大学学报(人文社科版),2007, 28(4):224-227.
[2] ALLEN T J. Managing the flow of technology:technology transfer and the dissemination of technological information within the R&D organization[M/OL].Cambrige,Mass.:MIT Press, 1977:132-149.[2017-03-14]. http://www.openisbn.org/download/0262010488.pdf.
[3] SONNENWALD D H, PIERCE L G. Information behavior in dynamic group work contexts:interwoven situational awareness, dense social networks and contested collaboration in command and control[J]. Information processing & management, 2000, 36(3):461-479.
[4] PREKOP P. A qualitative study of collaborative information seeking[J]. Journal of documentation, 2002, 58(5):533-547.
[5] HERTZUM M. The importance of trust in software engineers' assessment and choice of information sources[J]. Information & organization, 2002, 12(1):1-18.
[6] BRUCE H, FIDEL R, PEJTERSEN A M, et al. A comparison of the collaborative information retrieval behaviour of two design teams[J]. New review of information behaviour research, 2003, 4(1):139-153.
[7] FIDEL R, BRUCE H, PEJTERSEN A M, et al. Collaborative information retrieval (CIR)[J]. New review of information behaviour research, 2000, 117(1):298-298.
[8] FIDEL R, PEJTERSEN A M, CLEAL B, et al. A multidimensional approach to the study of human-information interaction:a case study of collaborative information retrieval[J]. Journal of the American Society for Information Science & Technology, 2004, 55(11):939-953.
[9] POLTROCK S, GRUDIN J, DUMAIS S, et al. Information seeking and sharing in design teams[C]//Proceedings of the 2003 international ACM SIGGROUP conference on supporting group work. Florida:ACM, 2003:239-247.
[10] 褚峻,张咏,巢乃鹏.信息查寻活动中的合作行为与合作式信息查寻[J].大学图书馆学报,2003,21(4):35-39.
[11] 李霞.高校创新型科研团队知识共享行为、学习行为及团队绩效研究[J].软科学,2012,26(6):83-87.
[12] 赵金航.团队层面知识共享绩效影响因素研究[J].兰州学刊,2011(1):63-68.
[13] 常涛,廖建桥.团队特征变量对知识共享影响的实证研究[J].情报理论与实践,2011,34(1):63-67.
[14] 徐建琳.研发团队知识共享意愿影响因素研究[D].扬州:扬州大学,2014.
[15] 董欲超,胡德华.不同级别项目团队科研人员信息查询行为特征与差异性[J].中华医学图书情报杂志,2014, 23(7):37-41.
[16] 胡德华,张娟,车丹,等.师生团队模式下科研人员信息查询行为特征和差异研究[J].图书情报工作,2014, 58(4):79-84.
[17] 董欲超,胡德华.项目团队科研人员信息查询行为与创新行为的互动机理[J].中华医学图书情报杂志, 2014, 23(10):11-17.
[18] 金燕,李昱瑶.科研团队成员的协同信息行为模型[J].情报理论与实践,2015,38(9):86-90.
[19] 刘会军.对文史科大学生社会实践科研团队建设的思考[J].教育与职业,2015(35):51-53.
[20] 张琼.团队:大学生"德能"发展的重要载体[J].中国成人教育,2011(2):79-82.
[21] 侯文军.当代大学生创新团队建设途径[J].江苏社会科学,2010(S1):138-141.
[22] 徐艳,崔莉.团队氛围:工科大学生创新团队建设的关键[J].江苏高教,2015(5):132-133.
[23] 王晓晔.大学生创业团队建设探究[J].教育与职业,2013(15):106-108.
[24] 聂慧,杨辉华.用学习型组织理论指导大学生创新团队建设[J].中国成人教育,2009(15):32-33.
[25] 田硕,许燕.心理资本在大学生创业团队建设中的作用与开发[J].江苏高教,2015, 179(1):105-107.
[26] 蒋琳,郁涛.非线性视角下大学生科技创新团队建设研究[J].中国成人教育,2014(16):31-33.
[27] 张宇明.大学生团队建设构想[J].中国人力资源开发,2007(4):99-100.
[28] 宋菊芳.大学生团队观念教育在高校学生工作中的意义及实施途径[J].中国成人教育,2011(4):40-41.
[29] 郭卉,韩婷,黄刚.科研实践共同体与拔尖创新人才培养——大学生在科技创新团队中的学习经历探究[J].高等工程教育研究,2016(6):42-47.
[30] 魏萍.团队精神视角下的大学生创新创业教育[J].中国高校科技,2016(12):85-86.
[31] 李斌.学习团队对大学生学习效能影响的实证研究[J].学校党建与思想教育,2016(10):50-52.
[32] 王雅静.大学生创新团队育人机制探析[J].教育理论与实践,2014(18):20-21.
[33] 陈旭阳,陈松.大学生异质化创业能力对创业绩效的影响——创业团队的中介作用[J].科技管理研究,2016(8):222-228.
[34] 李光红,张娜.社会资本对大学生创新团队绩效的影响研究——以"挑战杯"为例[J].科技进步与对策,2007,24(6):182-184.
[35] 尹洁,李锋,吴洁.大学生科研创新团队内部知识转移影响因素研究[J].科技管理研究,2010,30(15):153-156.
[36] 尹洁,杨建超.大学生科研创新团队内部知识转移的影响因素[J].高等工程教育研究,2011(3):60-63.
[37] 章小童,阮建海.大学生信息行为与影响因素探究——以大学生数学建模团队为例[J].图书情报工作,2016,60(4):107-114.
[38] 彭杜宏,余捷婷,刘电芝.大学生优胜创业团队互动过程特征[J].心理科学,2009(2):504-506.
[39] 丁韧.网络信息搜索行为研究——以我国高校学生为例[M].武汉:武汉大学出版社.2013:42-58.
[40] LARGE A, BEHESHTI J, RAHMAN T. Gender differences in collaborative Web searching behavior:an elementary school study[J]. Information processing & management, 2002, 38(3):427-443.
[41] 马费成,丁韧,李卓卓.案例研究:武汉地区高校学生信息素养现状分析[J].图书情报知识, 2009(1):24-29.
[42] WHITMIRE E. Disciplinary differences and undergraduates' information-seeking behavior[J]. Journal of the American Society for Information Science & Technology, 2002, 53(8):631-638.
[43] HILL J R. The World Wide Web as a tool for information retrieval:an exploratory study of users' strategies in an open-ended system.[J]. School library media quarterly, 1997, 25(4):229-236.
[44] XIE H. Understanding human-work domain interaction:implications for the design of a corporate digital library[J]. Journal of the Association for Information Science & Technology, 2006, 57(1):128-143.
[45] WOOD F, ELLIS D, FORD N. Hypertext and learning styles[J].Electronic library, 1993, 11(1):13-18.
[46] KUHLTHAU C C.Inside the search process:information seeking from the user's perspective[J]. Journal of the Association for Information Science & Technology, 1991, 42(5):361-371.
[47] GWIZDKA J, LOPATOVSKA I. The role of subjective factors in the information search process[J].Journal of the Association for Information Science & Technology, 2009, 60(12):2452-2464.
[48] KIM S, SOERGEL D. Selecting and measuring task characteristics as independent variables[C]//Proceedings of ASIS&T annual meeting. Charlotte:ASIS&T,2005:163-186.
[49] LI Y. Exploring the relationships between work task and search task in information search[J]. Journal of the Association for Information Science & Technology, 2009, 60(2):275-291.
[50] AGARWAL N K, XU Y, POO D C. A context-based investigation into source use by information seekers[J]. Journal of the Association for Information Science & Technology, 2011, 62(6):1087-1104.
[51] XIE H. Information searching and search models[M]//BATES M J, MAACK M N. Encyclopedia of library and information science, New York:Taylor and Francis Group LLC, 2010:523-537.
[52] 张晓娟, 张寒露, 范玉珊,等. Web2.0环境中大学生信息素养能力的拓展——基于网络自主学习与创新的调查与分析[J]. 现代情报, 2011, 31(4):35-39.
[53] 曾凡斌. 第二道数字鸿沟的影响因素研究——基于对大学生实证分析[J]. 江淮论坛, 2011, 245(1):134-144.
[54] 丁韧, 马费成, 刘永波. 基于场景测试的高校学生网络信息搜索能力评价[J]. 图书情报知识, 2011(3):72-76.
[55] 乔根森.参与观察法[M].龙筱红,张小山,译.重庆:重庆大学出版社,2009:2.
[56] 登斯库姆.怎样做好一项研究——小规模社会研究指南[M].陶保平,译.上海:上海教育出版社,2011:145-172.
[57] FLANAGAN J C. The critical incident technique[J]. Psychological bulletin, 1954, 51(4):327-358.
[58] 洛夫兰德,斯诺,安德森,等.分析社会情境:质性观察与分析方法[M].林小英,译.重庆:重庆大学出版社,2009:225-227,229.
[59] 登斯库姆.怎样做好一项研究——小规模社会研究指南[M].陶保平,译.上海:上海教育出版社,2011:245-246.
[60] 吴大刚,肖荣荣.C/S结构与B/S结构的信息系统比较分析[J].情报科学,2003,21(3):313-315.
[61] 常华.团队合作水平影响因素研究——以西瓷管理团队为例[D].西安:西北大学,2008.
[62] 全国十二所重点师范大学编写.心理学基础[M].北京:教育科学出版社,2008:212.
[63] 肖余春.团队行为学[M].杭州:浙江大学出版社,2006:27-28.
[64] 胡忠光.教育心理学[M].北京:教育科学出版社,2011:157-159.
[65] 刘文,韩静,张丽娜.大学生人际交往能力与心理健康关系的研究[J].中国特殊教育,2008(3):71-80.
[66] 李树祥,梁巧转,杨柳青.团队认知多样性:和团队沟通对团队创造力的影响研究[J].科学学与科学技术管理,2012,33(12):153-159.
[67] 詹妮.教师团队合作的影响因素研究[D].上海:华东师范大学,2016.
[68] 许治,陈丽玉,王思卉.高校科研团队合作程度影响因素研究[J].科研管理,2015,36(5):149-161.
[69] Wikipedia. Collaborative information seeking[EB/OL].[2017-09-28]. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Collaborative_information_seeking.
[70] WILSON T D. Human information behavior[J]. Forming science, 2000, 3(2):49.
[71] 吴丹.协同信息检索行为研究[M].北京:国家图书馆出版社,2015:3-30.
[72] 吴丹.协同信息检索行为研究[M].北京:国家图书馆出版社,2015:52-63.
Options
Outlines

/

〈 〉

    Copyrights © LIS Press Co., Ltd. Reproduction is prohibited without permission.