[Purpose/significance] In order to comprehensively evaluate the academic quality of single paper, this paper inherits the idea of p-index, and puts forward the pq-index of single paper based on the citation literature, and the pc-index of single paper based on the reference literature and citation literature. [Method/process] Taking the published paper data of 2013 in the field of library and information science as an example, this paper verified the evaluation effect of pq-index and pc-index. [Result/conclusion] It is found that in the measurement of the academic quality of single paper, the pq-index not only inherits the advantage of h-index and the academic trace, but also superior to h-index and the academic trace in terms of numerical differentiation and computational complexity. The pc-index also combines the reference literature and citation literature in a rating system. It not only has the performance of pq-index, h-index, the academic trace, but also provides a new perspective for single paper evaluation methods, which has a comprehensive advantage of evaluating the content quality and the academic influence of academic papers.
Liu Yunmei
,
Li Changling
,
Feng Zhigang
,
Liu Xiaohui
. Discussion of Improved p-index Evaluating the Academic Quality of Single Paper[J]. Library and Information Service, 2017
, 61(21)
: 106
-113
.
DOI: 10.13266/j.issn.0252-3116.2017.21.013
[1] GARFIELD E. Citation indexing:its theory and applications in science, technology and humanities[M]. New York:Wiley, 1979.
[2] HIRSCH J E. An index to quantify an individual's scientific research output that takes into account the effect of multiple coauthorship[J]. Scientometrics, 2010,85(3):741-754.
[3] YE F Y, LEYDESDORFF L. The "academic trace" of the performance matrix:a mathematical synthesis of the h-index and the Integrated Impact Indicator(I3)[J]. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 2014,65(4):742-750.
[4] 薛霏, 叶鹰. 大学的学术矩阵和学术迹探讨[J]. 大学图书馆学报, 2014(1):25-29.
[5] PRATHAP G. Is there a place for a mock h-index?[J]. Scientometrics, 2010,84(1):153-165.
[6] HAUSTEIN S, PETERS I, BAR-ILAN J, et al. Coverage and adoption of altmetrics sources in the bibliometric community[J]. Scientometrics, 2014,101(2):1145-1163.
[7] 唐继瑞, 叶鹰. 单篇论著学术迹与影响矩比较研究[J]. 中国图书馆学报, 2015(2):4-16.
[8] SCHUBERT A. Using the h-index for assessing single publications[J]. Scientometrics, 2009,78(3):559-565.
[9] 杨建林, 严明. 单篇期刊论文h指数的实证研究——以图书情报学为例[J]. 图书情报工作, 2010,54(12):145-148.
[10] 吴勤. 基于引证强度的学术论文质量评价方法研究[J]. 情报学报, 2007,26(4):522-526.
[11] 钟文一, 陈云鹏. 基于引证系数的论文影响力评价方法研究[J]. 情报科学, 2011(5):706-712.
[12] 王术, 叶鹰. 影响矩作为测度单篇论著影响力的评价指标探讨[J]. 大学图书馆学报, 2014(5):12-18.
[13] EGGHE L. On the relation between Schubert's h-index of a single paper and its total number of received citations[J]. Scientometrics, 2010,84(1):115-117.
[14] 陈小清, 刘丽, 邢美园. 单篇论著影响力评价指标比较分析——学术迹与altmetrics评分、F1000评分、Comment的比较[J]. 情报理论与实践, 2017(3):114-118.
[15] PRATHAP G. The 100 most prolific economists using the p-index[J]. Scientometrics, 2010,84(1):167-172.
[16] PRATHAP G. An iCE map approach to evaluate performance and efficiency of scientific production of countries[J]. Scientometrics, 2010,85(1):185-191.
[17] PRATHAP G. The iCE approach for journal evaluation[J]. Scientometrics, 2010,85(2):561-565.
[18] PRATHAP G. Evaluating journal performance metrics[J]. Scientometrics, 2012,92(2):403-408.
[19] 姜磊, 林德明. 参考文献对论文被引频次的影响研究[J]. 科研管理, 2015(1):121-126.
[20] 罗家洪, 薛茜. 医学统计学:案例版[M]. 北京:科学出版社, 2008.
