[Purpose/significance] This article attempts to analyze the formation way, the paradigm transfer and the knowledge increase structure of digitization scientific community to understand the structure, characteristics and change rules of digitization scientific community and to provide the basis for scientific research innovation and social progress.[Method/process] Through literature induction and contrast analysis method, this paper expounds the formation way, the paradigm transfer and the knowledge increase structure of digitization scientific community. [Result/conclusion] The formation of the digitization scientific community is the process of revolution from outside and inside based on meta science and scientific methodology. The transfer from Kuhn paradigm to Grey contextual is the main characteristic of the digitization scientific community paradigm shift. Information rationality beginning to replace math rationality is the new knowledge growth structure of digitization scientific community.
Li Jinhua
,
Jiang Yan
. The Formation and Paradigm of Digitization Scientific Community[J]. Library and Information Service, 2017
, 61(14)
: 40
-46
.
DOI: 10.13266/j.issn.0252-3116.2017.14.006
[1] 文学峰.试论科学共同体的非社会性[J].自然辨证法通讯,2003(3):60-64.
[2] 库恩.科学革命的结构[M].金吾伦,胡新和,译.北京:北京大学出版社,2003:5.
[3] 丁大尉,李正风.网络环境下当代科学共同体的虚拟重构[J].自然辩证法究,2014(3):53-58.
[4] 张天培.科学共同体在网络中的形象建构分析——以中国科学家群体为分析对象[J].新闻传播,2012(10):54-55.
[5] 程志波,李正风.论科学治理中的科学共同体[J].科学学研究,2012(2):225-231.
[6] 程志波,李正风,王彦雨.科学治理视野下的中国科学共同体:问题与对策[J].科学学研究,2010(12):1778-1784,1831.
[7] 金雪军,毛捷,袁佳.科学共同体合作行为的演化分析[J].经济评论,2004(3):36-44,52.
[8] MARTIN E,WOLFGANG R.Social networking in scientific conferences Twitter as tool for strengthen a scientific community[C]//Proceedings of the 1st international workshop on science.Berlin:Springer, 2009:1-8.
[9] SQUAZZONI F,GANDELLI C. Saint Mattew strikesn again:an agent-based model of peer review and the scientific community structure[J]. Journal of informetrics,2012,6(2):265-275.
[10] CERRONI A, SIMONELLA Z. Scientific community through grid-group analysis[J]. Social science information, 2014,53(1):119-138.
[11] 格雷克.信息简史[M].楼伟珊,高学栋,李松峰,译.北京:人民邮电出版社,2013:307.
[12] 卡罗尔.寻找希格斯粒子[M].向真,译.长沙:湖南科学技术出版社,2014:8.
[13] HEY T, TANSLEY T, TOLLE T.第四范式:数据密集型科学发现[M].潘教峰,张晓林,译.北京:科学出版社,2012:215-221,119.
[14] 查尔默斯.科学究竟是什么[M].鲁旭东,译.北京:商务印书馆,2013:133.
[15] 拉卡托斯,马斯格雷夫.批判与知识的增长[M].周寄中,译.北京:华夏出版社,1987:83-84.
[16] 拉卡托斯.科学研究纲领方法论[M].兰征,译.上海:上海译文出版社,2005:115
[17] 康德.纯粹理性批判[M].韦卓民,译.武汉:华中师范大学出版社,1991.
[18] 波普尔.客观知识[M].舒炜光, 卓如飞,周柏乔,等译.上海:上海泽文出版社, 1987:10,270.
[19] 皮亚杰.生物学与认识[M].尚新建,杜丽燕,李淅生,译.北京:三联书店出版社,1989:220-221.
[20] 刘啸霆.问题衍续与个体知识增长结构[J].哈尔滨市委党校学报,1999(5):14-17.
[21] 王良滨,洪晓楠.个人知识增长动力机制及其系统论分析[J].系统辩证学学报,2005(3):91-95.
[22] 时明德,郭强.略论知识增长的模式与机制[J].信阳师范学院学报(哲学社会科学版),1993,1(1):41-47.
[23] 赵红洲,蒋国华.知识单元与指数规律[J].科学学与科学技术管理,1984(9):39-41.
[24] 科恩.世界的重新创造:近代科学是如何产生的?[M].张卜天,译.长沙:湖南科学技术出版社,2012:12-20,82-98.
[25] 克拉夫特.维也纳学派[M].李步楼,陈维杭,译.北京:商务印书馆,1998:27,39-40.
[26] 刘刚.信息哲学的发展脉络[J].科研信息化技术与应用,2012(4):3-10.
[27] STONIER T. Information and the internal structure of the universe-an exploration into information physics[M]. London:Springer-Verlag, 1992:17.
[28] THAGARD P. The Digital phoenix:how computers are changing philosophy[M]. Hoboken:Blackwell Publishers Ltd, 1998:48-61.
[29] 邬焜,肖锋.信息哲学的性质、意义论辩[M].北京:中国社会科学出版社,2013:22,35,52.
[30] KURAWEIL R.奇点临近:2045年,当计算机智能超越人类[M].李庆诚,董振华,田源,译.北京:机械工业出版社,2011:123-180.
