[Purpose/significance] The paper constructs the comprehensive influence evaluation model of multidimensional indicators, and provides a new way for mining high value articles at different levels. [Method/process] This paperselected clinical neurology, chemistry, physics and geosciences as the representative of the natural sciences and selected information science and library science,economics and educational research as the representative of the social sciences.Then it collected the citation index data of the Web of Science and the metrological index data in Altmetric.com. The principal component analysis was used to establish the comprehensive influence model of academic papers. [Result/conclusion] Evaluation indicators of disciplines are different, the same indicators arethe citation frequency, Mendeley, Blogs. Academic influence occupies the main position in terms of paper evaluation, and research development on social influence is rapid. Last, the comprehensive influence of high articles can be mined by the combination of academic influence and social influence.
Wang Wenxia
,
Liu Chunli
. Study on the Differences of the Evaluation Model of Academic Papers Impact Between Different Domains[J]. Library and Information Service, 2017
, 61(13)
: 108
-116
.
DOI: 10.13266/j.issn.0252-3116.2017.13.013
[1] BUSCHMAN M,MICHALEK A.Are alternative metrics still alternative?[J]. Bulletin of the American Society for Information Science and Technology,2013,39(4):35-39.
[2] TORRES D,CABEZAS A,JIMENEZ E.Altmetrics: new indicators for scientific communication in Web 2.0[J]. Comunicar, 2013, 21(41):53-60.
[3] PRIEM J,TARABORELLI D,GROTH P,et al.Altmetrics:a manifesto[EB/OL].[2016-10-26].http://altmetrics.org/manifesto/.
[4] 韩鹏鸣. 期刊论文的影响力分析[J]. 情报科学,2010(10):1505-1508.
[5] 林德明,姜磊. 科技论文评价体系研究[J].科学学与科学技术管理,2012(10):11-17.
[6] 刘春丽. 基于软同行评议的科学论文影响力评价方法——F1000因子[J]. 中国科技期刊研究,2012(3):383-386.
[7] 何星星,武夷山. 基于文献利用数据的期刊论文定量评价研究[J].情报杂志,2012(8):98-102.
[8] PIWOWAR H. Altmetrics: value all research products[J]. Nature, 2013, 493(7431):159.
[9] 刘春丽. altmetrics:从理论假说、术语提出到内涵的重新界定[J]. 图书情报工作,2015,59(6):82-89.
[10] MOHAMMADI E,THELWALL M.Mendeley readership altmetrics for the social sciences and humanities: research evaluation and knowledge flows[J]. Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology, 2014, 65(8):1627-1638.
[11] BORNMANN L. Validity of altmetrics data for measuring societal impact: a study using data from altmetric and F1000prime[J]. Journal of informetrics, 2014, 8(4):935-950.
[12] THELWALLM, TSOUA, WEINGART S, et al. Tweeting links to academic articles[J]. Cybermetrics, 2013, 17(1):1-8.
[13] 由庆斌,韦博,汤珊红. 基于补充计量学的论文影响力评价模型构建[J]. 图书情报工作,2014,58(22):5-11.
[14] 赵蓉英,郭凤娇,谭洁. 基于Altmetrics的学术论文影响力评价研究——以汉语言文学学科为例[J]. 中国图书馆学报,2016(1):96-108.
[15] COSTAS R,ZAHEDI Z,WOUTERS P.The thematic orientation of publications mentioned on social media: large-scale disciplinary comparison of social media metrics with citations[J].Aslib journal of information management,2015,67(3):260-288.
[16] MOHAMMADIE,THELWALLM. Assessing the mendeleyreadership of social sciences and humanities research[C]//Proceedings of ISSI:14th international conference on scientometrics and informetrics.Vienna: University of Vienna and the AIT Austrian Institute of Technology,2013: 200-214.
[17] MOHAMMADI E, THELWALL M. Mendeley readership altmetrics for the social sciences and humanities: research evaluation and knowledge flows[J]. Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology, 2014, 65(8):1627-1638.
[18] 宋丽萍,王建芳,王树义.科学评价视角下F1000、Mendeley与传统文献计量指标的比较[J]. 中国图书馆学报,2014(4):48-54.
[19] 宋丽萍,陈巍,贺颖.论文层面科学评价实证研究——以PLoS ONE为例[J]. 图书馆工作与研究,2015(7):85-88.
[20] Altmetric.What data sources does altmetrictrack?[EB/OL].[2016-10-26].https://help.altmetric.com/support/solutions/articles/6000060968-what-data-sources-does-altmetric-track.
[21] Thomson Reuters.Web of Science[EB/OL].[2016-12-20].http://apps.webofknowledge.com/.
[22] Altmetric. The Altmetric API[EB/OL].[2016-12-26]. https://www.altmetric.com/products/altmetric-api/.
[23] 王建军,宋香荣.多元统计理论、实验与案例[M].北京:中国统计出版社,2014:140-150.
[24] KUHN T S.The structure of scientific revolutions [M].Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 2012.
