Library and Information Service >
A Case Study of Student Success Oriented Information Literacy Assessment
Received date: 2016-09-20
Revised date: 2016-11-09
Online published: 2016-12-05
[Purpose/significance] Information literacy is one of the core competences of student success. This article explores how to construct student success oriented information literacy assessment under the guidance of "Framework for Information Literacy for Higher Education". [Method/process] Evidence from "Knowledge Practices" and "Disposition" evaluation is collected through a innovative program and a citation analysis. [Result/conclusion] Students can benefit from the information literacy assessment in their "Knowledge Practices" and "Disposition".And the assessment can analyze the information literacy outcomes and document library contributions to student success.
Li Jingguang . A Case Study of Student Success Oriented Information Literacy Assessment[J]. Library and Information Service, 2016 , 60(23) : 46 -54 . DOI: 10.13266/j.issn.0252-3116.2016.23.006
[1] ACRL. Value of academic libraries:a comprehensive research review and report[R/OL]. Chicago:Association of College and Research Libraries, 2010.[2016-09-19].http://www.acrl.ala.org/value.
[2] Student Academic Success Services SJSU. Definition of student success for SJSU[EB/OL].[2016-09-19]. http://www.sjsu.edu/sass/definition.
[3] BROWN K, MALENFANT K J. Documented library contributions to student learning and success:building evidence with team-based assessment in action campus projects[R/OL]. Chicago:Association of College and Research Libraries,2016.[2016-09-19].http://www.ala.org/acrl/sites/ala.org.acrl/files/content/issues/value/contributions_y2.pdf.
[4] ACRL. Framework for information literacy for higher education[R/OL]. Chicago:Association of College and Research Libraries, 2015.[2016-09-19].http://www.ala.org/acrl/standards/ilframework.
[5] WITEK D, GRETTANO T. Teaching metaliteracy:a new paradigm in action[J]. Reference services review, 2014, 42(2):188-208.
[6] KUTNER L, ARMSTRONG A. Rethinking information literacy in a globalized world[J]. Communications in information literacy, 2012, 6(1):24-33.
[7] HOSIER A. Teaching information literacy through "un-research"[J]. Communications in information literacy, 2015, 9(2):126-135.
[8] ASH-ARGYLE R, SHOHAM S. Librarians' leadership efficacy, training, and school involvement:collaboration between teachers and school librarians in Israel[J]. School libraries worldwide, 2012, 18(1):1-17.
[9] DETMERING R, JOHNSON A M. Focusing on the thinking, not the tools:incorporating critical thinking into an information literacy module for an introduction to business course[J]. Journal of business & finance librarianship, 2011, 16(2):101-107.
[10] MACKEY T P, JACOBSON T E. Reframing information literacy as a metaliteracy[J]. College & research libraries, 2010, 72(1):62-78.
[11] MEYER J, LAND R. Threshold concepts and troublesome knowledge:linkages to ways of thinking and practising within the disciplines[M]. Edinburgh:University of Edinburgh, 2003:4-5.
[12] TOWNSEND L, BRUNETTI K, HOFER A R. Threshold concepts and information literacy[J]. portal:Libraries and the academy, 2011, 11(3):853-869.
[13] DAVIS H. Critical literacy? Information![EB/OL].[2016-09-19]. http://www.inthelibrarywiththeleadpipe.org/2010/critical-literacy-information.
[14] RODRIGUEZ D. Understanding library impacts on student learning[EB/OL].[2016-09-19]. http://www.inthelibrarywiththeleadpipe.org/2011/understanding-library-impacts-on-student-learning.
[15] HEAD A J, EISENBERG M B. Lessons learned:how college students seek information in the digital age[EB/OL].[2016-09-19]. http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2281478.
[16] LAND R, MEYER J. Threshold concepts and troublesome knowledge (5):dynamics of assessment[J]. Threshold concepts and transformational learning, 2010,42:61-79.
[17] OAKLEAF M. A roadmap for assessing student learning using the new framework for information literacy for higher education[J]. The journal of academic librarianship, 2014, 40(5):510-514.
[18] WHITLOCK B, EBRAHIMI N. Beyond the library:using multiple, mixed measures simultaneously in a college-wide assessment of information literacy[J]. College & research libraries, 2016, 77(2):236-262.
[19] 徐云,莫军成,莫岚. 大学生图书馆利用和学习成果的关联性实证研究——以桂林医学院为例[J]. 图书馆,2010(1):74-78.
[20] 徐云,沈鸥. 大学生图书馆利用类型与学习成果影响因素实证研究——以桂林医学院为例[J]. 图书情报工作,2010,54(21):74-79.
[21] 吴英梅,何璨. 高校图书馆对学生学业科研影响的实证研究——以北京师范大学为例[J]. 图书情报工作,2014,58(20):73-77.
[22] 刘桂宾. 利用图书馆对高校学生学习成果的影响——以南开大学为例[J]. 大学图书馆学报. 2015,33(6):25-35.
[23] 刘桂宾. 图书馆成效评估实证研究[J]. 图书馆工作与研究,2015(12):34-38.
[24] 秦小燕. 美国高校信息素养标准的改进与启示——ACRL《高等教育信息素养框架》解读[J]. 图书情报工作,2015,59(19):139-144.
[25] 李曈,叶志锋. 基于ACRL《高等教育信息素养框架》的我国高校信息素养教材质量评价与编写建议[J]. 图书情报工作,2015,59(16):54-59,109.
[26] 桂罗敏. 从技术到价值:《美国高等教育信息素养框架》的文化阐释[J]. 图书情报知识,2016(2):14-20,68.
[27] 杨鹤林. 美国《高等教育信息素养框架》分析与思考[J]. 图书情报工作,2015,59(12):141-146.
[28] 杨鹤林. 阈值概念:构建美国《高等教育信息素养框架》[J]. 图书馆杂志, 2016,35(5):68-74.
[29] 高冉,张波涛,茹海涛. 运用阈概念将信息素养教育嵌入环境科学专业的实践及效果评估[J]. 图书情报工作, 2016, 60(7):54-58.
[30] 韩丽风,王茜,李津,等. 高等教育信息素养框架[J]. 大学图书馆学报,2015(6):118-126.
/
| 〈 |
|
〉 |
