Library and Information Service >
A Comparative Study on the Access Points of Mobile Library and Non-mobile Library
Received date: 2016-08-10
Revised date: 2016-09-13
Online published: 2016-09-20
[Purpose/significance] Through the comparative study on the access points of mobile library and non-mobile library, this paper explores the different behaviors that users access library OPAC through different devices, providing reference for setting access points on OPAC of different devices. [Method/process] The paper uses the log mining method to compare the frequency of the access points, the search success rates of the access points, the change patterns of the access points and so on. [Result/conclusion] There are some differences between the mobile library and the non-mobile library in access point, and the non-mobile library has an advantage in the setting and use of the access points. Mobile library can simplify the content of the interface by discarding the access point of low probability; enable users to transfer access point conveniently by setting web tags; improve the proportion of group matching search by reducing the number of group matching access points and highlighting the access points and search box.
Key words： mobile library; non-mobile library; access point; user search behavior
Wu Dan , Bi Renmin . A Comparative Study on the Access Points of Mobile Library and Non-mobile Library[J]. Library and Information Service, 2016 , 60(18) : 21 -26 . DOI: 10.13266/j.issn.0252-3116.2016.18.003
[1] KIM L, ALBERS M J. Web design issues when searching for information using handheld interfaces[J]. Technical communication, 2002, 49(3):314-329.
[2] 吴丹, 毕仁敏. 用户移动搜索与桌面搜索行为对比研究[J]. 现代图书情报技术, 2016(2):1-8.
[3] KUMAR S, VOHRA R. User perception and use of OPAC:a comparison of three universities in the Punjab region of India[J]. Electronic library, 2013, 31(1):36-54.
[4] ADAM S. Web-based online public access catalogues of ⅡT libraries in India:an evaluative study[J]. Program electronic library & information systems, 2011, 45(4):415-438.
[5] ALIA A, SHAFIQUE F. What do users prefer, card catalogue or OPAC?:a study of Punjab University library[J]. Electronic library, 1983, 32(3):286-295.
[6] 赵荣, 王妍, 魏晨. OPAC用户专业学科需求调研及其改进途径[J]. 图书馆建设, 2009(8):24-28.
[7] 王海英, 汪其英. 国内现有主要OPAC的调查研究[J]. 农业图书情报学刊, 2011,23(12):48-53.
[8] 黄崑, 张路路, 郭建峰. 基于公共与非公共检索计算机的OPAC检索行为比较研究[J]. 图书情报工作, 2015,59(14):103-110.
[9] PETERS T A. When smart people fail:an analysis of the transaction log of an online public access catalog[J]. Journal of academic librarianship, 1988, 15(5):267-273.
[10] THORNE R, WHITLATCH J B. Patron online catalog success[J]. College & research libraries, 1994, 55(6):479-497.
[11] HILDRETH C R. The use and understanding of keyword searching in a university online catalog[J]. Information technology & libraries, 1997, 16(2):52-62.
[12] LARGE A, BEHESHTI J. OPACs:a research review[J]. Library & information science research, 1997, 19(2):111-133.
/
| 〈 |
|
〉 |
