Library and Information Service >
Exploration of Organizational Climate Optimization in Libraries: A Case Study in Nanjing Agricultural University Library
Received date: 2016-05-10
Revised date: 2016-06-05
Online published: 2016-06-20
[Purpose/significance] Organizational climate optimization helps to improve the librarians' satisfaction of the library and their work enthusiasm. Case analysis is helpful to promote organizational climate assessment in more libraries so as to provide support for management optimization.[Method/process] By learning from the practice of ClimateQUALTM assessment in American libraries and localizing it, Nanjing Agricultural University Library implemented the assessments in 2011 and 2015 separately, and then the library found the problems in the organization by analyzing data and optimizing the organization management continually. Thus, the library has completed the exploration of organizational climate optimization during the past four years.[Result/conclusion] According to the comparison of the data in two rounds of assessments, the organizational climate of Nanjing Agricultural University Library in 2015 is better than in 2011, especially in the climates of deep diversity, innovation, encouraging and competing, customer service and teamwork. It is confirmed that the organizational climate assessment is necessary and the measures of management innovation are effective.
Key words： libraries; organizational climate; management innovation; ClimateQUALTM
Tang Huiyan , Ni Feng , Chen Rongrong . Exploration of Organizational Climate Optimization in Libraries: A Case Study in Nanjing Agricultural University Library[J]. Library and Information Service, 2016 , 60(12) : 87 -94 . DOI: 10.13266/j.issn.0252-3116.2016.12.013
[1] FOREHAND G A,VON HALLER G. Environmental variation in studies of organizational behaviour[J]. Psychological bulletin,1964, 62(6):361-382.
[2] SCHNEIDER B, EHRHART M G, MACEY W H. Organizational climate and culture[J].Annual review of psychology, 2013,64(2):361-388.
[3] KYRILLIDOU M, LOWRY C, HANGES P, et al. ClimateQUALTM:organizational climate and diversity assessment[J]. C&RL news, 2009, 70(3):154-157.
[4] LI X, BRYAN L. On becoming an employer of choice:gauging employee satisfaction through climateQUAL®[J].Library trends, 2010,59(1/2):256-268.
[5] LOWRY C B.Subcultures and values in academic libraries-what does ClimateQUAL® research tell us?[EB/OL].[2016-06-01].http://libqual.org/documents/admin/Lowry_2011_Subcultures%20and%20Values%20in%20Academic%20Libraries%20-%20What%20does%20ClimateQUAL%20Research%20Tell%20Us.pdf
[6] 包平,周丽. ClimateQUALTM图书馆服务质量评价体系[J]. 大学图书馆学报,2010(5):96-100.
[7] 郑德俊.图书馆组织气候评价初论[J].中国图书馆学报,2011(2):120-128.
[8] 朱锁玲, 包平. 美国图书馆组织氛围测评的发展脉络及其启示[J]. 图书情报工作, 2016, 60(6):104-110.
[9] 郑德俊,张正慧.图书馆组织气候测评应用评析——以ClimateQUALTM应用为例[J].图书情报知识,2011(4):32-39.
[10] 徐佳宁. 模糊法优化ClimateQUALTM组织氛围评价法研究[J]. 图书情报工作, 2012, 56(15):49-53,60.
[11] 周丽,包平.从ClimateQUALTM的指标设计看中美图书馆组织文化及其背景的差异[J]. 图书馆理论与实践,2015(1):12-15.
[12] 郑德俊,胡晓辉.图书馆组织氛围测评的本土化量表开发[J].图书情报知识,2013(4):66-75.
[13] 江新.图书馆组织气候评价ClimateQUALTM的本土化研究[J].图书情报工作,2013,57(17):39-44,81.
[14] 胡晓辉. 美国图书馆组织气候改进方案的决策过程案例[J]. 图书情报工作,2016, 60(4):59-66.
[15] 周丽.基于ClimateQUALTM的高校图书馆服务质量评价体系研究[D].南京:南京农业大学,2010:68-71.
[16] 包平,周丽. 基于ClimateQUALTM的高校图书馆评价实证研究[J].大学图书馆学报,2012(1):35-40.
[17] FORMELL C, LARCKER D. Evaluating structure equations models with unobservable variables and measurement error[J]. Journal of marketing research, 1981, 18(2):39-50
/
| 〈 |
|
〉 |
