Library and Information Service >
Survey and Analysis ofInstitute Data Asset Audit from “Data Asset Framework” Perspective
Received date: 2016-02-25
Revised date: 2016-04-05
Online published: 2016-04-20
[Purpose/significance] With the fourth paradigm of data-intensive scientific discovery is emerging, institute data asset audit has been an important prerequisite for data-intensive scientific discovery. By the survey of institute data asset audit based on "Data Asset Framework" on abroad, to provide a reference for the research data management in home.[Method/process] This paper analyzed the JISC-funded Data Asset Framework(DAF) and the practice of overseas universities based DAF by literature research and web-based survey, then analyzed the characteristics、audit steps and experiences and lessons learned of institute data asset audit based on "Data Asset Framework". Finally, proposes specific measures for institute data asset audit in home.[Result/conclusion] DAF is a universal and systematically framework. Institute data asset audit based on "Data Asset Framework" could completely find out data asset. DAF give the direction、standardize the data asset audit、prevent errors and miss asset information for institute data asset audit in home.
Key words： research data management; Data asset framework; Data asset audit; DAF
Wei Junchao , Yu Haiyan . Survey and Analysis ofInstitute Data Asset Audit from “Data Asset Framework” Perspective[J]. Library and Information Service, 2016 , 60(8) : 59 -67,92 . DOI: 10.13266/j.issn.0252-3116.2016.08.006
[1] 杨鹤林. 数据监护:美国高校图书馆的新探索[J]. 大学图书馆学报, 2011(2):18-21,41.
[2] Managing and sharing data[EB/OL].[2016-01-05]. http://www.data-archive.ac.uk/media/2894/managingsharing.pdf.
[3] JONES S, BALL A, EKMEKCIOGLU Ç. The data audit framework:a first step in the data management challenge[J]. International journal of digital curation, 2008,3(2):112-120.
[4] LYON L. Dealing with data:roles, rights, responsibilities and relationships[EB/OL].[2016-01-11]. http://www.ukoln.ac.uk/ukoln/staff/e.j.lyon/reports/dealing_with_data_report-final.pdf.
[5] Akers K G, Doty J. Disciplinary differences in faculty research data management practices and perspectives[J]. International journal of digital curation, 2013,8(2):5-26.
[6] Data asset framework[EB/OL].[2016-01-05]. http://www.data-audit.eu/.
[7] DAF:a toolkit to identify research assets and improve data management[EB/OL].[2016-01-05]. http://www.data-audit.eu/docs/DAF_iPRES_paper.pdf.
[8] Data audit framework methodology[EB/OL].[2016-01-05]. http://www.data-audit.eu/DAF_Methodology.pdf.
[9] DAF implementation guide[EB/OL].[2016-01-05]. http://www.data-audit.eu/docs/DAF_Implementation_Guide.pdf.
[10] Developing an audit methodology suited to research data[EB/OL].[2016-01-20]. http://www.data-audit.eu/docs/DAF_launch_methodology_slides.pdf.
[11] The DAF development project final report[EB/OL].[2016-01-20]. http://www.data-audit.eu/docs/DAFDfinalreport.pdf.
[12] COX A, WILLIAMSON L. The 2014 DAF survey at the University of Sheffield[J]. International journal of digital curation, 2015,10(1):210-229.
[13] Parsons T. Creating a research data management service[J]. International journal of digital curation, 2013,8(2):146-156.
[14] JAMES A J, WILSON L M, MICHAEL A, et al. An institutional approach to developing research data management infrastructure[J].International journal of digital curation, 2011,6(2):274-287.
[15] Research data management project:a DAF investigation of research data management practices at The University of Northampton[EB/OL].[2016-01-20]. http://nectar.northampton.ac.uk/2736/1/Alexogiannopoulos20102736.pdf.
[16] Research data management at London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine:Web survey report[EB/OL].[2016-01-20]. http://blogs.lshtm.ac.uk/rdmss/files/2013/04/LSHTM-RDM-Web-Survey-Report.pdf.
[17] Summary findings of open exeter DAF survey[EB/OL].[2016-01-20]. https://ore.exeter.ac.uk/repository/handle/10036/3689.
[18] Research data management survey, the University of Nottingham[EB/OL].[2016-01-20]. http://admire.jiscinvolve.org/wp/files/2013/02/ADMIRe-Survey-Results-and-Analysis-2013.pdf.
[19] Institutional readiness for data stewardship:findings and recommendations from the Georgia Tech research data assessment[EB/OL].[2016-01-20]. http://hdl.handle.net/1853/48188.
[20] Edinburgh data audit implementation project final report[EB/OL].[2016-01-20]. http://ie-repository.jisc.ac.uk/283/1/edinburghDAFfinalreport_version2.pdf.
[21] Southampton data survey:our experience and lessons learned[EB/OL].[2016-01-20]. http://www.disc-uk.org/docs/SouthamptonDAF.pdf.
[22] Results of the 2012 University of Oxford research data management survey[EB/OL].[2016-01-02]. https://blogs.it.ox.ac.uk/damaro/2013/01/03/university-of-oxford-research-data-management-survey-2012-the-results/.
[23] 洪正国,项英. 基于Dspace构建高校科学数据管理平台——以蝎物种与毒素数据库为例[J]. 图书情报工作, 2013,57(6):39-42,84.
[24] 张计龙,殷沈琴,张用,等.社会科学数据的共享与服务——以复旦大学社会科学数据共享平台为例[J]. 大学图书馆学报,2015(1):74-79.
[25] 洪程,钱鹏. 高校研究生科学数据需求与利用行为调查分析[J]. 国家图书馆学刊, 2014(1):16-21.
[26] 胡永生,刘颖. 基于用户调查的高校科学数据管理需求分析[J]. 图书情报工作, 2013,57(6):28-32,78.
[27] Lessons learned from the intial four pilot audits[EB/OL].[2016-01-20]. http://www.data-audit.eu/docs/DAF_lessons_learned.pdf.
[28] University of Leeds research data survey 2012[EB/OL].[2016-01-20]. http://library.leeds.ac.uk/info/377/roadmap/122/roadmap_project_outputs/7.
/
| 〈 |
|
〉 |
