Library and Information Service >
Status, Problem and Solution of Opening Government Data in China Under the International Comparison Perspective
Received date: 2016-01-20
Revised date: 2016-03-20
Online published: 2016-04-05
[Purpose/significance] This paper aims to objectively analyze the situation and problem of opening government data in China, and establish the system of opening government data which conforms to China' national condition.[Method/process] Based on sorting out the contents of typical international assessment systems of opening government data, this paper systematically analyzes the basic attitudes to opening China's government data under different evaluation systems.[Result/conclusion] Through comparing different international organizations' evaluation systems, it explores the problems and shortcomings in opening China's government data from the perspectives of data openness, legal and regulation framework, organization and management system, technology and standard issue. Then, it proposes to establish the system of opening China's government data, in terms of seven analytical aspects: paying more attention to opening strategy of government data, making national top-level design, developing comprehensive regulatory system, unifying organization and management, drawing a unified technical standards and so on.
Xia Yikun . Status, Problem and Solution of Opening Government Data in China Under the International Comparison Perspective[J]. Library and Information Service, 2016 , 60(7) : 34 -40 . DOI: 10.13266/j.issn.0252-3116.2016.07.005
[1] LATHROP D, RUMA L. Open government:collaboration, transparency, and participation in practice[M]. Sebastopol:O'Reilly Media, 2010, 28(1):129-130.
[2] World Bank. Open data for economic growth[R/OR].[2015-05-21].http://www.worldbank.org/.../Open-Data-for-Economic-Growth.pdf.
[3] 丁艺.从《联合国2014年电子政务调查报告》看全球政府数据公开[J].电子政务,2014(9):9-14.
[4] The global status of requesting government information[EB/OL].[2015-06-25].http://worldjusticeproject.org/open-government-index/global-status-requesting-government-information.
[5] BIRKINSHAW P. Freedom of information:the law, the practice, and the ideal[M]. Cambridge:Cambridge University Press,2010:369-710.
[6] [EB/OL].[2016-03-12].http://index.okfn.org/place/.
[7] The World Wide Web Foundation.Open data barometer global report(January 2015)[R/OL].[2015-12-25].http://www.opendatabarometer.org.
[8] PARYCEK P, HOCHTL J, GINNER M. Open government data implementation evaluation[J]. Journal of theoretical and applied electronic commerce research, 2014, 9(2):80-99.
[9] Global right to information rating map[EB/OL].[2016-03-15]. http://www.rti-rating.org/.
[10] The RTI Rating analyses the quality of the world's access to information laws,China[EB/OL].[2016-03-15]. http://www.rti-rating.org/view_country?country_name=China.
[11] Sunlight Foundation (2013).Local policy[EB/OL].[2016-03-15].http://sunlightfoundation.com/policy/Local/.
[12] ANTTI HALONEN. Being Open About Data-Analysis of the UK open data policies and applicability of open data[R/OL].[2015-03-20].http://www.finnish-institute.org.uk/en/articles/images/stories/pdf2012/being%20open%20about%20data.pdf.
[13] HORSLEY J P. China's leaders endorse disclosure as the 'Norm'[EB/OL].[2015-08-15].http://www.freedominfo.org/2014/11/chinas-leaders-endorse-disclosure-norm/.
[14] MEMOIRE A.Capacity development workshop on open government data sensitization, gap assessment and strategic planning[EB/OL].[2015-12-15].http://workspace.unpan.org/sites/Internet/Documents/Aide_Memoire_Uruguay.docx.pdf.
[15] 赵磊,马利敏, 周春阳. 大数据对政府数据管理能力新要求研究[J].综合经济杂志,2014(3):27-31.
[16] China, Institutional & Legal Setting (Rank:47th/58, Score:43/100)[EB/OL].[2016-02-18].http://www.resourcegovernance.org/countries/asia-pacific/china/overview.
[17] 夏义堃.发展中国家开放政府数据战略的比较分析[J].电子政务,2015(7):27-36.
[18] MARTIN A S, ROSARIO A H D,PÉREZL M D C C.An International analysis ofthe quality of open government data portals[J]. Social science computer review,2015(6):1-14.
[19] Waseda University and International Academy of CIO (IAC). WASEDA-IAC 10th international E-Government ranking 2014[R/OR].[2016-03-20].http://www.e-gov.waseda.ac.jp/pdf/2014_E-Gov_Press_Release.pdf.
/
| 〈 |
|
〉 |
