Quality Evaluation and Written Proposals for Higher Education Information Literacy Textbooks in Chinese Colleges and Universities Based on ACRL's “Framework for Information Literacy for Higher Education

  • Li Tong ,
  • Ye Zhifeng
Expand
  • Library, Nanjing University of Aeronautics and Astronautics, Nanjing 210016

Received date: 2015-07-16

  Revised date: 2015-08-05

  Online published: 2015-08-20

Abstract

[Purpose/significance]To improve the quality of information literacy textbooks in Chinese colleges and universities, this paper studies the guiding effect of the 2015 ACRL “Framework for Information Literacy for Higher Education” on the construction of information literacy textbooks in colleges and universities.[Method/process]Through reading and analyzing the concepts of “Framework for Information Literacy for Higher Education”, an evaluation model for information literacy textbooks is summarized and established.This paper analyzes the effects that new framework makes to the indexes in the model.[Result/conclusion]It gives some adjustment methods in novelty, range and key for the contents of Chinese information literacy textbooks, and offers some improving suggestions for the textbooks design, such as the consciousness target, three-dimensional structure, interactive experience, effectiveness evaluation and schematism appearance.

Cite this article

Li Tong , Ye Zhifeng . Quality Evaluation and Written Proposals for Higher Education Information Literacy Textbooks in Chinese Colleges and Universities Based on ACRL's “Framework for Information Literacy for Higher Education”[J]. Library and Information Service, 2015 , 59(16) : 54 -59,109 . DOI: 10.13266/j.issn.0252-3116.2015.16.009

References

[1] ACRL.Framework for information literacy for higher education[EB/OL].[2015-07-05].http://www.ala.org/acrl/standards/ilframework.
[2] ACRL.Textbooks for students[EB/OL].[2015-07-05].http://www.ala.org/acrl/aboutacrl/directoryofleadership/sections/is/iswebsite/projpubs/textbooksstudents.
[3] 谈大军,张旭.美国高校图书馆与情报学专业信息检索课程设置分析[J].图书情报工作,2014,58(15):79-86.
[4] Tensen B L.Research strategies for a digital age[M].北京:北京大学出版社,2008.
[5] 赵静.信息检索与利用[M].北京:清华大学出版社,2014.
[6] 刘培兰.现代信息检索与利用教程[M].北京:北京交通大学出版社,2014.
[7] 邓发云.信息检索与利用[M].北京:科学出版社,2013.
[8] 沈固朝,施国良.信息源和信息采集[M].北京:清华大学出版社,2012.
[9] Wu Chao-Yen, Huang Min-Chuan.Decision-making process in evaluation of high school defense education teaching material using fuzzy theory[J].ICIC Express Letters,2012, 6(6):1501-1506.
[10] Matsuyama C, Nakashima T, Ishii N, et al.Development of teaching material on the Web for programming course and its evaluation[C]//Proceedings of the Third ACIS International Conference on Software Engineering Research, Management and Applications.Michigan:IEEE Computer Society,2005:213-218.
[11] Baki A, Gíveli E.Evaluation of a Web based mathematics teaching material on the subject of functions[J].Computers and Education,2008,51(2):854-863.
[12] AAAS.美国科促会2061计划[EB/OL].[2015-07-05].http://2061.cast.org.cn/n11115958/ n11117730/n11117975/11153004.html.
[13] 高凌飚.教材评价维度与标准[J].教育发展研究,2007(12):8-12.
[14] 王连照.全球视域下影响教材知识选择的因素分析[J].教育理论与实践,2015,35(8):45-46.
[15] 周义军.关于建立高校教材评价体系的思考[J].现代出版,2011(3):24-26.
[16] 郑昭彦.基于工学结合的教材质量测量维度开发与实证研究——以高职酒店管理专业为例[J].重庆交通大学学报(社会科学版),2015,15(2):122-125.
[17] 夏旭.一本特色应用型信息检索教材——《科技信息检索与利用》评介[J].图书馆论坛,2013,33(5):166-169.
[18] 清华大学图书馆.高等教育信息素养框架[EB/OL].[2015-07-25].http://lib.tsinghua.edu.cn/ dra/.
[19] Townsend L, Brunetti K, Hofer A R.Threshold concepts and information literacy[J].Libraries and the Academy,2011,11(3):853-869.
[20] Agee A.Metaliteracy:Reinventing information literacy to empower learners[J].Reference & User Services Quarterly,2014, 54(2): 77-78.
[21] King R.Metacognition: Information literacy and Web 2.0 as an instructional tool[J].Currents in Teaching & Learning,2011,3(2):22-32.
[22] Debose K G, Miller R K.Stewarding our first-year students into the information ecosystem: A case study[J].Journal of Agricultural & Food Information,2015,16(2):123-133.
[23] 初天斌,李少明.移动互联网背景下立体化教材出版的应用研究[J].出版发行研究,2015(2):39-42.
Outlines

/