Library and Information Service >
Research Review of "Science-technology Relationship" Research Methods: Highlights on Bibliometrics Method
Received date: 2015-04-17
Revised date: 2015-06-05
Online published: 2015-07-05
[Purpose/significance] "Science-technology relationship" is a hot research topic in information science recently, and bibliometrics method is common used in this area. This paper aims to review some main bibliometrics methods used in "science-technology relationship" research and give some suggestions to apply these methods better.[Method/process] Based on the review on definition of "science-technology relationship" and related research methods, this paper draws a systematic summary of application and research progress of three bibliometrics methods both at home and abroad, which include analysis of papers cited by patents, analysis of patents cited by papers and correlation analysis of the author and inventor. The theoretical basis, applied range and shortages of the three methods are compared comprehensively.[Result/conclusion] The three methods have different theoretical basis. They are applied in identifying technology fields which have strong relationship with scientific fields, identifying technology fields, countries and organizations that are cited most by scientific fields, and measuring scientific research activities of inventors and the partnership between universities and businesses. These methods also have some drawbacks respectively, for example, patents' citing motivations air not clear and patents' paper references are not standard; the amount of data is small, the analysis of subject and the research of influence mechanism of technology to science is not enough; the identification and match of inventors' names and authors' ones are difficult. Appropriate bibliometrics methods should be chose based on research questions and data features when doing "science-technology relationship" research and the problems of these methods should be solved.
Liu Xiaoling , Tan Zongying , Zhang Chaoxing . Research Review of "Science-technology Relationship" Research Methods: Highlights on Bibliometrics Method[J]. Library and Information Service, 2015 , 59(13) : 142 -148 . DOI: 10.13266/j.issn.0252-3116.2015.13.020
[1] 白春礼. 纳米科技及其发展前景[J]. 科学通报, 2001(2):89-92.
[2] Carpenter M P, Narin F. Validation study: Patent citations as indicators of science and foreign dependence [J]. World Patent Information, 1983,5(3): 180-185.
[3] Grupp H, Schmoch U. Dynamics of science-based innovation [M]. Berlin:Springer Science+Business Media, 1992: 73-128.
[4] Rip A. Science and technology as dancing partners in technological development and science in the industrial age [M]. Bakker: Kroes Press, 1992: 231-270.
[5] Narin F, Hamilton K S, Olivastro D. Linkage between agency supported research and patented industrial technology [J]. Research Evaluation, 1995, 5(3): 183-187.
[6] 巨乃岐, 刘冠军. 从科学与技术的关系看科学向技术转化的实质与要求 [J]. 河南大学学报 (社会科学版), 2004, 44(1): 24-28.
[7] 郭慧志, 郭红燕, 施凤丹. 大脑与手: 从工业革命论科学与技术的关系 [J]. 科学学研究, 2007, 25(2): 178-183.
[8] Zhao Qingjun, Guan Jiancheng. Modeling the dynamic relation between science and technology in nanotechnology [J]. Scientometrics, 2012, 90(2): 561-579.
[9] Van Looy B. Do science & technology interactions pay off when developing technology? An exploratory investigation of 10 science-intensive technology domains [J]. Scientometrics, 2003, 58(3): 355-367.
[10] Bhattacharya S, Meyer M. Large firms and the science-technology interface patents, patent citations, and scientific output of multinational corporations in thin films[J]. Scientometrics, 2003, 58(2): 265-279.
[11] Choung J Y, Min H G, Park M C. Patterns of knowledge production: The case of information and telecommunication sector in Korea[J]. Scientometrics, 2003, 58(1): 115-128.
[12] de Solla Price D J. Is technology historically independent of science? A study in statistical historiography [J]. Technology and Culture, 1965, 6(4): 553-568.
[13] Verbeek A, Debackere K, Luwel M. Science cited in patents: A geographic "flow" analysis of bibliographic citation patterns in patents [J]. Scientometrics, 2003, 58(2): 241-263.
[14] Garfield E. Patent citation indexing and the notions of novelty, similarity and relevance [J]. Essays of An Information Scientist, 1984, 7(3): 536-542.
[15] Narin F, Hamilton K S, Olivastro D. The increasing linkage between US technology and science [J]. Research Policy, 1997, 26(3): 317-330.
[16] Narin F, Noma E. Is technology becoming science? [J]. Scientometrics, 1985, 7(3-6): 369-381.
[17] Verbeek A, Debackere K, Luwel M, et al. Linking science to technology: Using bibliographic references in patents to build linkage schemes [J]. Scientometrics, 2002, 54(3): 399-420.
[18] Guan Jiancheng, He Ying. Patent-bibliometric analysis on the Chinese science-technology linkages [J]. Scientometrics, 2007, 72(3): 403-425.
[19] Gao Xia, Guan Jiancheng. Networks of scientific journals: An exploration of Chinese patent data [J]. Scientometrics, 2009, 80(1): 285-304.
[20] Zhao Zhiyun, Lei Xiaoping. Empirical analysis of the relationship between technology innovation and basic research [J]. Current Science, 2013, 104(6): 714-720.
[21] 张玲玲, 李睿, 李婧. 在期刊-专利引用网中发现支撑技术创新的基础知识——以D01F技术领域为例 [J]. 情报理论与实践, 2014, 37(5): 64-68.
[22] Henderson R, Jaffe A B. Patent citations and geography of knowledge spillovers: A reassessment [J]. American Economic in Review, 2005, 1(3): 461-466.
[23] Acosta M, Coronado D. Science-technology flows in Spanish regions: An analysis of scientific citations in patents [J]. Research Policy, 2003, 32(10): 1783-1803.
[24] Hu A G Z, Jaffe A B. Patent citations and international knowledge flow: The cases of Korea and Taiwan [J]. International Journal of Industrial Organization, 2003, 21(6): 849-880.
[25] Dosi G, Lerena P, Sylos L M. The relationships between science, technologies and their industrial exploitation: An illustration through the myths and realities of the so-called "European Paradox" [J]. Research Policy, 2006, 35(10): 1450-1464.
[26] Geuna A, Nesta L. University patenting and its effects on academic research: The emerging European evidence [J]. Research Policy, 2006, 35(6): 790-807.
[27] Bacchiocchi E, Montobbio E F. Knowledge diffusion from university and public research: A comparison between US, Japan and Europe using patent citations [J]. Journal of Technology Transfer, 2009, 34(2): 169-181.
[28] Van Looy B, Debackere K, Callaert J, et al. Scientific capabilities and technological performance of national innovation systems: An exploration of emerging industrial relevant research domains[J]. Scientometrics, 2006, 66(2): 295-310.
[29] Wang Yuandi, Pan Xiongfeng, Chen Yantai, et al. Do references in transferred patent documents signal learning opportunities for the receiving firms?[J]. Scientometrics, 2013, 95(2): 731-752.
[30] Chen Carey Ming-Li, Su Hsin-Ning, Lee Pei-Chun. Does non-patent reference measure university-industry collaboration?[C]//Technology Management for Emerging Technologies (PICMET), Proceedings of 2012 PICMET':IEEE, 2012: 1049-1053.
[31] Hung Wen-Chi, Ding Cherng G., Wang Hung-Jui, et al. Evaluating and comparing the university performance in knowledge utilization for patented inventions[J]. Scientometrics, 2015, 102(2): 1269-1286.
[32] Ribeiro L C, Kruss G, Britto G, et al. A methodology for unveiling global innovation networks: Patent citations as clues to cross border knowledge flows[J]. Scientometrics, 2014, 101(1): 61-83.
[33] 杨祖国, 陈红, 褚金涛,等. 中国专利被《SCI》来源刊论文引用情况的统计与分析[J]. 情报科学, 1999, 17 (4): 422-428.
[34] Glanzel W, Meyer M. Patents cited in the scientific literature: An exploratory study of reverse citation relations [J]. Scientometrics, 2003, 58 (2): 415-428.
[35] 李睿. 基于专利引文分析的科学-技术关联探测模型改进 [D]. 北京: 中国科学院文献情报中心, 2011.
[36] 殷媛媛. 基于论文专利引证关系的科学技术互动研究——以立体显示为实证分析[J]. 图书情报工作, 2012, 56 (16): 65-70.
[37] 吴菲菲, 黄鲁成, 石媛嫄. 基于文献和专利相互引用的科学与技术关系分析 [J]. 科学学与科学技术管理, 2013, 34 (10): 13-20.
[38] Huang Mu-Hsuan, Yang Hsiao-Wenb, Chen Dar-Zen. Increasing science and technology linkage in fuel cells: A cross citation analysis of papers and patents [J]. Journal of Informetrics, 2015, 9 (2):237-249.
[39] 王刚波, 官建成. 纳米科学与技术之间的联系:基于学术型发明人的分析 [J]. 中国软科学, 2009(12): 71-79.
[40] Noyons E C M, Van Raan A F J, Grupp H, et al. Exploring the science and technology interface: Inventor-author relations in laser medicine research[J]. Research Policy, 1994, 23(4): 443-457.
[41] Paker A, Webster K. Patenting culture in Science: Reinventing the scientific wheel of credibility [J]. Science, Technology and Human Values, 1996, 21 (4): 427-453.
[42] Balconi M, Breschi S, Lissoni F. Networks of inventors and the role of academia: An exploration of Italian patent data[J]. Research Policy, 2004, 33 (1): 127-145.
[43] Murray F. The role of academic inventors in entrepreneurial firms: Sharing the laboratory life [J]. Research Policy, 2004, 33 (4): 643-659.
[44] Wang Gangbo, Guan Jiancheng. Measuring science-technology interactions using patent citations and author-inventor links:An exploration analysis from Chinese nanotechnology[J]. Journal of Nanoparticle Research, 2011, 13(12): 6245-6262.
[45] Meyer M. Does science push technology? Patents citing scientific literature[J]. Research Policy, 2000, 29(3): 409-434.
[46] Michel J, Bettels B. Patent citation analysis:A closer look at the basic input data from patent search reports[J]. Scientometrics, 2001, 51(1): 185-201.
[47] Callaert J, Pellens M, Van Looy B. Sources of inspiration? Making sense of scientific references in patents[J]. Scientometrics, 2014, 98(3): 1617-1629.
[48] Callaert J, Grouwels J, Van Looy B. Delineating the scientific footprint in technology: Identifying scientific publications within non-patent references[J]. Scientometrics, 2011, 91(2): 383-398.
[49] Liaw Yi-Ching, Chan Te-Yi,Fan Chin-Yuan, et al. Can the technological impact of academic journals be evaluated? The practice of non-patent reference (NPR) analysis[J]. Scientometrics, 2014, 101(1): 17-37.
[50] Shirabe M. Identifying SCI covered publications within non-patent references in US utility patents[J]. Scientometrics, 2014, 101(2): 999-1014.
[51] Maraut S, Martínez C. Identifying author-inventors from Spain:Methods and a first insight into results[J]. Scientometrics, 2014, 101(1): 445-476.
/
| 〈 |
|
〉 |
