Library and Information Service >
Research on Role Expectation in Public Digital Cultural Resources Integration
Received date: 2015-05-10
Revised date: 2015-05-20
Online published: 2015-06-05
[Purpose/significance] This paper aims to discuss,the behavior subject composition, roles construction and role functions setting in Chinese public digital cultural resources integration projects, to provide some reference for similar projects to construct.[Method/process] This research firstly teases out the logic relationships of some concepts under a conception framework of role expectation of the Social Role Theory, which include setting and assignment of role expectation and setting and assignment of role function Then, based on analysis of related literatures and government documents, it designs the interview outline and survey questionnaire of role expectation, conducts an investigation on practitioners of public cultural institutes, and summarizes, analyzes and discusses the interview results and questionnaire.[Result/conclusion] In Chinese public digital cultural resources integration projects, public institutes are more willing to cooperate with those in the same administrative levels. Roles assignment should be on the basis of Schema of Informational Development by Ministry of Culture (2013-2020) which is a government official document, the role expectations of all practitioners be considered to, all agents be assigned with appropriate roles, and the harmonization and mediator effect of the third institute be emphasized . Based on all the above, it suggests that the role functions should be expanded in details according the existing role assignment.
Key words: cultural resources; resources integration; role study; function analysis
Zhang Fangyuan . Research on Role Expectation in Public Digital Cultural Resources Integration[J]. Library and Information Service, 2015 , 59(11) : 28 -35 . DOI: 10.13266/j.issn.0252-3116.2015.11.004
[1] Yarrow A, Clubb B, Draper J L. Public libraries, archives and museums: Trends in collaboration and cooperation[M]. Hague:International Federation of Library Associations and Institutions, 2008:1-53.
[2] Purday J. Think culture: Europeana.eu from concept to construction[J]. Electronic Library, 2009, 27(6): 919-937.
[3] 全根先. 口述史、影像史与中国记忆资源建设[J].国家图书馆学刊, 2015(1): 10-16.
[4] 肖希明. “国外公共数字文化服务资源整合研究”专题引言[J]. 图书与情报, 2015(1): 1.
[5] 李伟超. 世界数字图书馆项目研究进展[J]. 情报理论与实践, 2014, 37(7): 141-144, 122.
[6] 文化部信息化发展纲要(2013-2020年)[EB/OL]. [2015-04-02]. http://www.gov.cn/gzdt/2013-09/18/content_2490872.htm.
[7] 胡昌平, 张耀坤. 跨系统协同信息服务及其发展[J]. 图书馆论坛, 2010, 30(6): 27-33.
[8] 周承聪. 信息服务生态系统运行与优化机制研究[D]. 武汉:华中师范大学, 2011.
[9] 韩若画, 刘涛, 范紫薇,等. 国内外“记忆工程”实施现状综述[J]. 档案学通讯, 2012(3): 14-18.
[10] 赵生辉, 朱学芳. 我国图书馆、档案馆、博物馆数字化协作框架D-LAM研究[J]. 情报资料工作, 2013(4): 57-61.
[11] 杨佳露. 国有文化事业单位管理体制改革研究[D]. 上海:上海交通大学, 2012.
[12] 夏义堃. 公共信息资源的多元化管理体制研究[D]. 武汉:武汉大学, 2005.
[13] 杨小森. 加强地方政府间横向合作与协调机制建设[J]. 黑龙江社会科学, 2006, 8(4): 45-48.
[14] 莫振轩. 国内图书馆业务外包研究现状及趋势[J]. 图书情报工作, 2007, 51(8): 113-116.
[15] 张波. 政府公共文化服务职能创新研究[D]. 长春:吉林大学,2009.
/
〈 | 〉 |