Library and Information Service >
Interdisciplinary Research Review
Received date: 2015-01-23
Revised date: 2015-02-11
Online published: 2015-03-05
[Purpose/significance] Interdisciplinary research is of great significance. Through an review and analysis to interdisciplinary research methods of measurement theory and practice, we try to probe the existing problems of current research on interdisciplinary and put forward the future research thoughts and contents.[Method/process] Through an analysis to the related literature of interdisciplinary, combining comprehensive analysis to the types and dynamics of interdisciplinarity, a selective analysis to the current interdisciplinarity measurement methods based on citation analysis was conducted.[Result/conclusion] The current interdisciplinary research can be put into macro and micro levels, and the main contents of the study including research on the types, the dymamics and the measurement indexes to interdisciplinary. We put the measurement properties of interdisciplinarity into diversity and cohesion, and put the measurement indicators into three types: diversity measurement indicators, cohesion measurement indicators and comprehensive measurement indicators and proceed further comparative analysis on the three types indicators. The existing interdisciplinarity measurement practice can be put into three types: the statistical measurement, the indicators based on the social networks analysis and the comprehensive measurement by a variety of indicators.
Xu Haiyun , Yin Chunxiao , GuoTing , Tan Xiao , Fang Shu . Interdisciplinary Research Review[J]. Library and Information Service, 2015 , 59(5) : 119 -127 . DOI: 10.13266/j.issn.0252-3116.2015.05.019
[1] Klein J T. A conceptual vocabulary of interdisciplinary science[M].Toronto:University of Toronto,2000:3-4.
[2] 刘仲林.交叉科学时代的交叉研究[J].科学学研究,1993,(2):11-18.
[3] 徐飞.科学交叉论[M].合肥:安徽教育出版社,1991.
[4] 杨永福,洪咸友. 科学发展中的学科交叉研究史例探析[J].自然辩证法研究,1999,15(4): 59-63.
[5] Morillo F, Bordons M,Gómez I. An approach to interdisciplinarity through bibliometric indicators[J]. Scientometrics, 2001,51(1): 203-222.
[6] Rosenfield P L. The potential of transdisciplinary research for sustaining and extending linkages between the health and social sciences[J]. Social Science & Medicine, 1992,35(11): 1343-1357.
[7] 路甬祥.学科交叉与交叉科学的意义[J].中国科学院院刊, 2005,20(1):58-60.
[8] 边缘学科[EB/OL]. [2014-09-03].http://baike.baidu.com/view/139450.htm?fr=aladdin.
[9] 李春景,刘仲林. 现代科学发展学科交叉模式探析——一种学科交叉模式的分析框架[J]. 科学学研究, 2004(3): 244-248.
[10] 金薇吟. 学科交叉方法探析[J]. 科学学研究, 2006(5): 667-671.
[11] 周文娟. 基于诺贝尔自然科学奖的学科交叉研究[D].南昌:南昌大学, 2010.
[12] 潘教峰, 张晓林,韩涛,等.科学结构地图2012[M].北京:科学出版社,2013.
[13] 刘庆生.浅谈多学科交叉综合研究[EB/OL]. [2014-09-10].http://blog.sciencenet.cn/blog-673617-741400.html.
[14] 李喜先. 论交叉科学[J]. 科学学研究, 2001(1): 22-27.
[15] 王晶华,施红玉.从系统科学角度看学科交叉现象[J].科学学与科学技术管理, 2002(12): 5-8.
[16] Qin Jian, Lancaster F W,Allen B. Types and levels of collaboration in interdisciplinary research in the sciences[J]. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 1997,48(10): 893-916.
[17] 刘仲林. 现代交叉科学[M].杭州:浙江教育出版社,1998.
[18] 马跃, 蔡兵,于小娟. 交叉学科研究的成长环境与动力机制分析[J]. 研究与发展管理, 2007(5): 105-110.
[19] 金薇吟. 学科交叉理论与高校交叉学科建设研究[D].苏州:苏州大学, 2005.
[20] Stirling A. A general framework for analysing diversity in science, technology and society[J]. Journal of the Royal Society Interface, 2007,4(15): 707-719.
[21] Rafols I,Meyer M. Diversity and network coherence as indicators of interdisciplinarity: Case studies in bionanoscience[J]. Scientometrics, 2010,82(2): 263-287.
[22] Porter A L,Chubin D E. An indicator of cross-disciplinary research[J]. Scientometrics, 1985,8(3): 161-176.
[23] Porter A L, Cohen A S, Roessner J D,et al. Measuring researcher interdisciplinarity[J]. Scientometrics, 2007,72(1): 117-147.
[24] 沈世镒,吴忠华. 信息论基础与应用[M].北京:高等教育出版社,2004.
[25] Shannon C E. A mathematical theory of communication[J]. ACM SIGMOBILE Mobile Computing and Communications Review, 2001,5(1): 3-55.
[26] Lerman R I, Yitzhaki S. A note on the calculation and interpretation of the Gini index[J]. Economics Letters, 1984, 15(3): 363-368.
[27] D Krackhardt, R Stern. Informal networks and organizational crises: An experimental simulation[J]. Social Psychology Quarterly, 1988,(5):123-140.
[28] 刘军.整体网分析讲义-UCINET 软件应用 (第二届社会网与关系管理研讨会资料)[C]//哈尔滨: 哈尔滨工程大学社会学系, 2007,111.
[29] 张金柱, 韩涛,王小梅. 利用参考文献的学科分类分析图书情报领域的学科交叉性[J]. 图书情报工作, 2013,57(1):108-111.
[30] 陈赛君.领域交叉性分析指标与方法新探及其实证研究[J]. 情报学报, 2013,32(11): 1184-1195.
[31] Porter A L, Roessner D J,Heberger A E. How interdisciplinary is a given body of research?[J]. Research Evaluation, 2008,17(4): 273-282.
[32] Schummer J. Multidisciplinarity, interdisciplinarity, and patterns of research collaboration in nanoscience and nanotechnology[J]. Scientometrics, 2004,59(3): 425-465.
[33] Qiu Liwen. A study of interdisciplinary research collaboration[J]. Research Evaluation, 1992,2(3): 169-175.
[34] Rafols I,Meyer M. How cross-disciplinary is bionanotechnology? Explorations in the specialty of molecular motors[J]. Scientometrics, 2007,70(3): 633-650.
[35] 杨建林,孙明军. 利用引文索引数据挖掘学科交叉信息[J]. 情报学报, 2004,23(6): 672-676.
[36] 魏海燕, 尹怀琼,刘莉. 基于引文分析的情报学与相关学科的研究[J]. 情报杂志, 2010(2):38-43.
[37] 杨良斌, 金碧辉. 跨学科测度指标体系的构建研究[J]. 情报杂志, 2009,28(7): 65-69.
[38] 杨良斌, 周秋菊,金碧辉. 基于文献计量的跨学科测度及实证研究[J]. 图书情报工作,2009,53(10): 87-90.
[39] Porter A L,Rafols I. Is science becoming more interdisciplinary? Measuring and mapping six research fields over time[J]. Scientometrics, 2009,81(3): 719-745.
[40] Small H. Maps of science as interdisciplinary discourse: Co-citation contexts and the role of analogy[J]. Scientometrics, 2010,83(3): 835-849.
[41] Hammarfelt B. Interdisciplinarity and the intellectual base of literature studies: Citation analysis of highly cited monographs[J]. Scientometrics, 2011,86(3): 705-725.
[42] Chang Yu-Wei,Huang Mu-Hsuan. A study of the evolution of interdisciplinarity in library and information science: Using three bibliometric methods[J]. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 2012,63(1): 22-33.
[43] Hurd J M. Interdisciplinary research in the sciences: Implications for library organization[J]. College & Research Libraries, 1992,53(4): 283-297.
[44] Tang Rong. Evolution of the interdisciplinary characteristics of information and library science[J]. Proceedings of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 2004,41(1): 54-63.
[45] 张洪磊,魏建香,杜振东,等.基于社会复杂网络的学科交叉研究[J]. 情报杂志, 2011,30(10): 25-29.
[46] 李长玲,刘非凡,郭凤娇. 运用重叠社群可视化软件 CFinder 分析学科交叉研究主题——以情报学和计算机科学为例[J]. 图书情报工作, 2013,57(7): 75-80.
[47] 于洋, 张睿军,杨亚楠. 以情报学为视角的学科交叉研究[J]. 情报杂志, 2013,32(2): 1-5.
[48] Leydesdorff L,Rafols I. Indicators of the interdisciplinarity of journals: Diversity, centrality, and citations[J]. Journal of Informetrics, 2011,5(1): 87-100.
[49] Leydesdorff L, Rafols I,Chen Chaomei. Interactive overlays of journals and the measurement of interdisciplinarity on the basis of aggregated journal-journal citations[J]. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 2013,64(12): 2573-2586.
[50] 许海云, 刘春江, 雷炳旭,等. 学科交叉的测度、可视化研究及应用——一个情报学文献计量研究案例[J]. 图书情报工作, 2013,57(12): 95-101.
/
| 〈 |
|
〉 |
