Library and Information Service >
The Quantified Description of Journal Citation Image: Based on the Citation Images of Nature and Science in 2010
Received date: 2014-08-18
Revised date: 2014-09-19
Online published: 2014-11-07
For journals, there is a mutually strengthening mechanism among their academic influence, peer review criterion of manuscripts, and the academic influence of published articles. The citation from a journal with higher academic influence should have higher value in journal evaluation. And since authors select journals to cite and to publish their articles, the journals with lower academic influence are less frequently cited. So the academic influence of a journal could be evaluated by examining the citing frequency and corresponding academic influence of its citing journals which constitute its own citation image. Taking the journal citation images in 2010 of two comprehensive journals, Nature and Science, as examples, and regarding the journal impact factor as a rough index of journal academic influence, this article proposes a way of weighting impact factors of citing journals with their citing frequencies so that the academic influence of journals can be evaluated by their quantified citation images.
Yan Jianxin , Su Fangli , Xu Lili . The Quantified Description of Journal Citation Image: Based on the Citation Images of Nature and Science in 2010[J]. Library and Information Service, 2014 , 58(21) : 99 -104 . DOI: 10.13266/j.issn.0252-3116.2014.21.014
[1] White H D, McCain K W.Visualizing a discipline: An author co-citation analysis of information science, 1972-1995[J]. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 1998,49(4):327-355.
[2] Nebelong-Bonnevie E. Methods for journal evaluation: Journal citation identity, journal citation image and internationalisation[J]. Scientometrics, 2006, 66(2):411-424.
[3] Nebelong-Bonnevie E, Frandsen T F. Journal citation identity and journal citation image: A portrait of the Journal of Documentation[J]. Journal of Ducumentation, 2006, 62(1):30-57.
[4] Frandsen T F. Journal diffusion factors: A measure of diffusion?[J]. ASLIB Proceedings, 2004, 56(1):5-11.
[5] Rowlands I. Journal diffusion factor: A new approach to measuring research influence[J]. ASLIB Proceedings, 2002, 54(2):77-84.
[6] 郑德俊,叶继元. 期刊引用认同及其被引评价新指标有效性分析[J]. 中国图书馆学报, 2010,36(7):106-114.
[7] 李晓辉,孙坦. 基于期刊引用形象和期刊引用认同的期刊评价[J]. 大学图书馆学报, 2011(2):103-107.
[8] 李燕萍. 基于期刊的引用认同和引证图像研究[J]. 情报理论与实践, 2011,34(2): 38-41.
[9] 苏芳荔. 引用认同和引证形象在引文分析中的应用研究[J]. 图书情报工作, 2012, 56(22):77-82.
[10] 严建新,王续琨.中国科学技术期刊的学术分层机制[J].科学学研究,2008, 26(1):52-57.
[11] 任胜利. 特征因子(Eigenfactor):基于引证网络分析期刊和论文的重要性[J]. 中国科技期刊研究,2009,20(3):415-418.
[12] 杨康,刘明政,张旭. SJR指数研究及其与影响因子的比较分析[J]. 情报杂志, 2009, 28(11):27-30.
[13] 李超. 引用质量加权影响因子评价学术期刊研究:以CSSCI图书情报学期刊评价为例[J]. 大学图书馆学报, 2012(1):29-34.
[14] 默顿. 科学社会学[M].鲁旭东,林聚任,译. 北京:商务印书馆,2003:395-397.
[15] Merton R K, Gaston J. The sociology of science in europe[M].Carbondale:Southern Illinois University Press,1977:48.
[16] 李正风. 科学知识生产方式及其演变[M]. 北京:清华大学出版社,2006:209-223.
[17] Chen Chaomei. CiteSpaceⅡ: Detecting and visualizing emerging trends and transient patterns in scientific literature[J]. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 2006, 57(3):359-377.
/
| 〈 |
|
〉 |
