Library and Information Service >
Measurement, Visualization and Application of Interdisciplinary Research
Received date: 2014-05-06
Revised date: 2014-06-05
Online published: 2014-06-20
Discipline-crossing is becoming more and more widely in scientific research, and lots of important technology breakthroughs spring up in discipline-crossing fields, therefore quantitative study for discipline-crossing is significant to science development and technology management. Quantitative study of discipline-crossing mainly consists of two ways: indicators and maps. Firstly, we analyzed the differences between Rao-Stirling, Shannon Entropy, Between Centrality, Network Density and Network Coreness in depth, and also the characteristic of discipline-crossing overlay map. Secondly, we made an empirical study to Information Science & Library Science from 2001 to 2010 in Web of Science, and also got the correlation. We find the cross-degree doesn't expand between Information Science & Library Science and larger span disciplines, and its core position has been weakened. Finally, through discipline-crossing coverage map, we show the areas of Information Science & Library Science research range as well as disciplines that have closest relationship with Information Science.
Xu Haiyun , Liu Chunjiang , Lei Bingxu , Li Linghui , Fang Shu . Measurement, Visualization and Application of Interdisciplinary Research[J]. Library and Information Service, 2014 , 58(12) : 95 -101 . DOI: 10.13266/j.issn.0252-3116.2014.12.015
[1] Klein J T. A conceptual vocabulary of interdisciplinary science[A].Practising Interdisciplinarity[M].Toronto:University of Toronto Press, 2000: 3-24.
[2] 杨永福,洪咸友. 科学发展中的学科交叉研究史例探析[J].自然辩证法研究, 1999,15(4): 59-63.
[3] 冯一潇. 诺贝尔奖为何青睐交叉学科[EB/OL].[2013-10-25].http://news.sciencenet.cn/htmlnews/2010/2/227982.shtm?id=227982.
[4] 路甬祥. 学科交叉与交叉科学的意义[J].中国科学院院刊, 2005,20(1): 58-60.
[5] 杨建林,孙明军. 利用引文索引数据挖掘学科交叉信息[J].情报学报, 2004,23(6): 672-676.
[6] 魏海燕, 尹怀琼,刘莉. 基于引文分析的情报学与相关学科的研究[J].情报杂志, 2010,29(2):38-43.
[7] Rafols I, Meyer M. How cross-disciplinary is bionanotechnology? Explorations in the specialty of molecular motors[J].Scientometrics, 2007,70(3): 633-650.
[8] 魏建香. 学科交叉知识发现及其可视化研究[D].南京:南京大学, 2010.
[9] Porter A L,Chubin D E. An indicator of cross-disciplinary research[J].Scientometrics, 1985,8(3): 161-176.
[10] Porter A L,Rafols I. Is science becoming more interdisciplinary? Measuring and mapping six research fields over time[J].Scientometrics, 2009,81(3): 719-745.
[11] 杨良斌, 金碧辉. 跨学科测度指标体系的构建研究[［J].情报杂志, 2009,28(7): 65-69.
[12] 杨良斌, 周秋菊,金碧辉. 基于文献计量的跨学科测度及实证研究[J].图书情报工作,2009,53(10): 87-90.
[13] Small H. Maps of science as interdisciplinary discourse: Co-citation contexts and the role of analogy[J].Scientometrics, 2010,83(3): 835-849.
[14] Hammarfelt B. Interdisciplinarity and the intellectual base of literature studies: Citation analysis of highly cited monographs[J].Scientometrics, 2011,86(3): 705-725.
[15] Morillo F, Bordons M, Gómez I. An approach to interdisciplinarity through bibliometric indicators[J].Scientometrics, 2001,51(1): 203-222.
[16] 李长玲, 刘非凡,郭凤娇. 运用重叠社群可视化软件 CFinder 分析学科交叉研究主题——以情报学和计算机科学为例[J].图书情报工作,2013,57(7): 75-80.
[17] 张洪磊, 魏建香, 杜振东, 等. 基于社会复杂网络的学科交叉研究[J].情报杂志, 2011, 30(10): 25-29.
[18] 于洋, 张睿军,杨亚楠. 以情报学为视角的学科交叉研究[J].情报杂志, 2013,32(2): 1-5.
[19] 刘则渊, 王贤文,陈超美. 科学知识图谱方法及其在科技情报中的应用[J].数字图书馆论坛, 2009(10): 14-34.
[20] 刘则渊, 陈锐,侯海燕. 科学知识图谱:方法与应用[M].北京:人民出版社, 2008.
[21] Stirling A. "Opening up" and "closing down" power, participation, and pluralism in the social appraisal of technology[J].Science, Technology & Human Values, 2008,33(2): 262-294.
[22] Rafols I, Porter A L, Leydesdorff L. Science overlay maps: A new tool for research policy and library management[J].Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 2010,61(9): 1871-1887.
[23] Klavans R, Boyack K W. Toward a consensus map of science[J].Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 2009,60(3): 455-476.
[24] Krapivsky P, Redner S. Network growth by copying[J].Physical Review E, 2005,71(3): 036118.
[25] Hey T, Tansley S, Tolle K.第四范式:数据密集型科学发现[M].潘教峰,张晓林,等译. 北京:科学出版社,2012.
[26] Tempest, D. Breaking boundaries:Patterns in interdisciplinary citation[J].Research Trends, 2009(11).
[27] Liu Yuxian, Rousseau R. Knowledge diffusion through publications and citations: A case study using ESI-fields as unit of diffusion[J].Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 2010,61(2): 340-351.
[28] 叶培华. 企业知识生态系统的涌现机理研究[D].长春:吉林大学, 2008.
[29] Stirling A. A general framework for analysing diversity in science, technology and society[J].Journal of the Royal Society Interface, 2007,4(15): 707-719.
[30] Rafols I, Meyer M. Diversity and network coherence as indicators of interdisciplinarity:Case studies in bionanoscience[J].Scientometrics, 2010,82(2): 263-287.
[31] 张金柱, 韩涛,王小梅. 利用参考文献的学科分类分析图书情报领域的学科交叉性[J].图书情报工作, 2013,57(1): 108-111.
[32] 沈世镒,吴忠华. 信息论基础与应用[M].北京:高等教育出版社,2004.
[33] Shannon C E. A mathematical theory of communication[J].ACM SIGMOBILE Mobile Computing and Communications Review, 2001,5(1): 3-55.
[34] 刘军. 整体网分析讲义[M].上海:格致出版社,2009.
[35] 张玥,朱庆华. 学术博客交流网络的核心——边缘结构分析实证研究[J].图书情报工作, 2009,53(12): 25-29.
[36] Leydesdorff L, Carley S,Rafols I. Global maps of science based on the new Web of science categories[J].Scientometrics, 2013,94(2): 589-593.
[37] Porter A L, Cohen A S, Roessner J D, et al. Measuring researcher interdisciplinarity[J].Scientometrics, 2007,72(1): 117-147.
/
| 〈 |
|
〉 |
