The Causes and Paths Analysis of Subject Librarian Qualification Certification System Implementation:Discussion on the Combination of Subject Librarian System and Library Professional Qualification System

  • Cai Qing
Expand
  • Shenzhen Library, Shenzhen 518036

Received date: 2014-03-19

  Revised date: 2014-05-03

  Online published: 2014-05-20

Abstract

In consideration of the development dilemma, the implementation of library professional qualification certification system in China needs a breakthrough. As a key to advance the specialization and professionalization of libraries, the barriers of subject librarian system also need solutions such as qualification certification. Analyzing and clarifying the relationship between subject librarian system and library professional qualification system will be beneficial for the establishment of library professional qualification system and perfection of library professional qualification system. Based on the combination of the two systems, the realization paths of subject librarian certification system can be analyzed including the establishment of subject librarian qualification certification standards and evaluation standards, the selection of certification methods and evaluation methods, and the analysis of relevant management system.

Cite this article

Cai Qing . The Causes and Paths Analysis of Subject Librarian Qualification Certification System Implementation:Discussion on the Combination of Subject Librarian System and Library Professional Qualification System[J]. Library and Information Service, 2014 , 58(10) : 94 -98 . DOI: 10.13266/j.issn.0252-3116.2014.10.016

References

[1] 吴慰慈. 图书馆职业资格认证制度[J]. 图书馆建设, 2004(2):7-8.

[2] 国务院办公厅关于清理规范各类职业资格相关活动的通知(国办发73号)[EB/OL].[2014-03-02].http://www.gov.cn/zwgk/2008-01/07/content_851653.htm.

[3] 彭立伟. 国外学科馆员制度的分期与角色演变研究[J]. 江西图书馆学刊, 2007(4):93-95.

[4] Hay F J. The subject specialist in the academic library: A review article[J]. The Journal of Academic Librarianship, 1990, 16(1): 11-17.

[5] 张晓林. 学术信息交流体系的重组与大学信息服务模式的再造[J]. 大学图书馆学报, 2000(1):16-20.

[6] 柯平, 唐承秀. 新世纪十年我国学科馆员与学科服务的发展(下)[J].高校图书馆工作, 2011(3):3-7, 22.

[7] 张丽宁. 高校图书馆"学科馆员"制度的不足与完善[J].科技情报开发与经济, 2005(16): 51-52.

[8] 李杨林, 纪晓平."211"重点大学学科馆员状况分析[J].图书馆杂志, 2007(1): 39-40, 52.

[9] 周玉芝. 学科馆员制度实施的影响因素及对策分析[J]. 现代情报, 2008(3):28-30.

[10] 黄红卫. 高校图书馆推行学科馆员制度的障碍及应对措施[J]. 图书馆建设, 2009(8):65-69.

[11] 王世伟. 论图书馆参考馆员制度与职业资格证书制度的结合[J]. 情报资料工作, 2003(4):52-54.

[12] Young H, Belanger T. The ALA Glossary of Library and Information Science[M]. Chicago: American Library Association, 1983.

[13] ODLIS[EB/OL].[2014-03-06]. http://www.abc-clio.com/ODLIS/odlis_A.aspx.

[14] 刘琼. 中美大学学科馆员的初步比较研究[J]. 大学图书馆学报, 2005(4):13-16.

[15] 初景利, 张冬荣. 第二代学科馆员与学科化服务[J]. 图书情报工作, 2008, 52(2):6-10, 68.

[16] 吴晓慧, 王晶, 马静, 等. 美国高校学科馆员资格认证和考核评价的研究与借鉴[J]. 科技情报开发与经济, 2011(14):22-25.

Outlines

/