Library and Information Service >
Analysis on Exploratory Factor of Relevance Criteria in Collaborative Information Seeking & Retrieval
Received date: 2013-08-30
Revised date: 2013-09-18
Online published: 2013-10-05
The relevance criteria scale about collaborative information seeking and retrieval is given based on the cases study and early research achievements. The data on relevance judgment about it are collected with the questionnaire, which are completed by students of university and institute. Some exploratory statistical techniques, such as critical value comparison, internal consistence comparison, means comparison, and factor analysis, are applied to carry out quantitative analysis. Composed of 34 items in the relevance criteria scale, eight conceptual catalogues of collaborative relevance criteria are identified, which are information source characteristics, information content usefulness, information index characteristics, information representation pattern, information quality, accessibility, information structure characteristics and information dissemination characteristics. But in terms of eight conceptual catalogues, probably 60% variation of variance can be interpreted, which means that the collaborative relevance criteria in the scale are not the sole basis to judge relevance and there are other factors to influence the collaborative relevance judgment.
Tong Ying , Li Peng , Xia Hui . Analysis on Exploratory Factor of Relevance Criteria in Collaborative Information Seeking & Retrieval[J]. Library and Information Service, 2013 , 57(19) : 30 -36 . DOI: 10.7536/j.issn.0252-3116.2013.19.004
[1] Foster J.Collaborative information seeking and retrieval[J]. Annual Review of Information Science and Technology, 2006, 40: 329-356.
[2] 韩毅,李健,樊志伟,等.合作信息检索的演化发展及研究现状[J].情报科学,2009,27(9):1430-1435.
[3] 吴丹,邱瑾. 国外协同信息检索行为的研究综述[J].中国图书馆学报,2012,38(5):100-110.
[4] Baeza-Yates R, Ribeiro-Neto B.现代信息检索(影印版)[M].北京:机械工业出版社,2004:308.
[5] Barry C L.User-defined relevance criteria: An exploratory study[J]. Journal of the American Society for Information Science,1994,45 (3):149-159.
[6] Zhang X M.Collaborative relevance judgment:A group consensus method for evaluating user search performance[J].Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology,2002,53(3):220-231.
[7] Wu I, Liu D.A collaborative relevance feedback approach to task-driven recommendation[EB/OL]. [2012-10-17]. http://www.pacis-net.org/file/2003/papers/e-business/265.pdf.
[8] Liu D, Wu I.Collaborative relevance assessment for task-based knowledge support[J].Decision Support Systems,2008,44(2):524-543.
[9] Foley C, Smeaton A F, Lee H.Synchronous collaborative information retrieval with relevance feedback[EB/OL]. [2012-10-17]. http://doras.dcu.ie/222/1/ieee_collab_com_2006.pdf.
[10] Foley C.Division of labor and sharing of knowledge for synchronous collaborative information retrieval[D]. Dublin:Dublin City University,2008.
[11] 徐树维.用户同步协作检索模型及其机制研究[D].北京:中国科学院文献情报中心,2010.
[12] González-Ibáñez R,Shah C.A proposal for measuring and implementing group's affective relevance in collaborative information seeking[EB/OL]. [2012-10-17]. http://research.microsoft.com/en-us/um/people/ryenw/hcir2010/docs/papers/gonz%C3%A1lez-ib%C3%A1%C3%B1ez_pp17.pdf.
[13] González-Ibáñez R.Group's Affective Relevance,Affective Feedback,and Emotional Awareness(Part 1)[EB/OL].[2011-12-21].http://collab.infoseeking.org/node/19.
[14] Cuadra C A, Katter R V. Opening the black box of 'relevance'[J]. Journal of Documentation, 1967, 23(4): 291-303.
[15] Nilan M S, Peek R P, Snyder H W. A methodology for tapping user evaluation behaviors: An exploration of users' strategy, source and information evaluating[C]//Proceedings of the 51st Annual Meeting of the American Society for Information Science. Maryland : Association for Information Science and Technology ,1988, 25:152-159.
[16] Park T K.The nature of relevance in information retrieval:An empirical study[J].Library Quarterly,1993,63(3): 318-351.
[17] Rees A M , Schultz D G. A field experimental approach to the study of relevance assessments in relation to document searching (2vols,NSF Contract No.C-423)[Z].Center for Documentation and Communication Research, School of Library Science, Case Western Reserve University, CleveIand,OH.1967.
[18] Cool C,Belkin N J,Kantor P B.Characteristics of texts affeceting relevance judgments[C]//Williams M E.Proceedings of the 14th National Online Meeting.editor Medford, NJ:Learned Information,Inc,1993:77-84.
[19] Tang R,Solomon P.Toward an understanding of dynamics of relevance judgment:An analysis of one person's search behavior[J].Information Processing & Management,1998,34(2/3):237-256.
[20] Savolainen R,Kari J.User-defined relevance criteria in Web searching[J].Journal of Documentation, 2006, 62(6): 685-707.
[21] Taylor A R,Cool C, Belkin N J,et, al.Relationships between categories of relevance criteria and stage in task completion[J].Information Processing and Management,2007,43(4):1071-1084.
[22] Wang P. A cognitive model of document selection of real users of information retrieval systems[D]. Washington D C: University of Maryland, College Park, 1994.
[23] Tombros A, Ruthven I, Jose J M. Searchers' criteria for assessing web page[OL]. [2012-10-17]. http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/download?doi=10.1.1.5.4158&rep=rep1&type=pdf.
[24] Yang Meng.An exploration of users' video relevance criteria[D].Chapel Hill:University of North Carolina,2005.
[25] Schamber L.User's criteria for evaluation in a multimedia information seeking and use situation[D].Syracuse University,1991.
[26] Barry C L.User-defined relevance criteria:An exploratory study[J].Journal of the American Society for Information Science,1994,45(3):149-459.
[27] Eisenberg M, Barry C.Order effects:A study of the possible influences of presentation order on user judgment of document relevance[J].Journal of the American Society for Information Science,1988,39(5):293-300.
[28] Kim S,Oh J S, Oh S. Best-answer selection criteria in a social Q&A site from the user-oriented relevance perspective[EB/OL]. [2012-10-17]. http://curric.dlib.vt.edu/papers/ASIST2007_0525_Yahoo_Answers_Final_version.pdf.
[29] Barnes M D.Measuring the relevance of evaluation criteria among health information seekers on the Internet[J].Journal of Health Psychology,2003,8(1):71-82.
[30] Burton V T,Chadwick S A.Investigating the practices of student researchers:Patterns of use and criteria for use of Internet and library sources[J].Computers and Composition,2000,17(3):309-328.
[31] Wu Ying-Tien,Tsai Chin-Chung. Information commitments:Evaluative standards and information searching strategies in Web-based learning environments[J].Journal of Computer Assisted learning,2005,21(3):374-385.
[32] 吴明隆.问卷统计分析实务:SPSS操作与应用[M].重庆:重庆大学出版社,2010.
/
| 〈 |
|
〉 |
