Library and Information Service >
2013 >Issue 08: 135 - 140
Literature Review of Academic Impact Measurement for Authors Based on Both Co-authorship and Citation Relationship
Received date: 2013-01-31
Revised date: 2013-04-05
Online published: 2013-04-20
The trend of scientific research cooperation has become increasingly significant, which leads to the discussions about the academic impact measurement based on co-authorship. These studies include two main aspects, one is to adjust traditional citation impact indexes to co-authorship; the other is to measure authors' impact in co-authorship network, and explore the correlation with citation impact indexes. The results show that there is the positive correlation between the network centrality index of authors and its cited index, and h index, and g index. It is necessary to combine them to comprehensively assess the academic impact of authors in the environment of scientific research cooperation. Finally, this paper investigates the theoretical basis for a double measurement of academic impact from the perspectives of scientific communication and academic relationship between authors.
Du Jian , Zhang Bin , Tang Xiaoli . Literature Review of Academic Impact Measurement for Authors Based on Both Co-authorship and Citation Relationship[J]. Library and Information Service, 2013 , (08) : 135 -140 . DOI: 10.7536/j.issn.0252-3116.2013.08.025
[1] Ioannidis J P A. Measuring co-authorship and networking-adjusted scientific impact[J]. PLoS ONE,2008, 3(7): e2778.
[2] Qiu J. Publish or perish in China[J]. Nature,2010,463(7278):142-143.
[3] 杜建,张玢,李阳. 我国医学领域不同学科作者合作度与论文影响力的关系[J].中华医学图书情报杂志,2012,21(3):18-23.
[4] Hirsch J E. An index to quantify an individual's scientific research output[J]. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America,2005, 102(46): 16569-16572.
[5] 杜建,张玢.作者合作视角下的h指数计量方法:比较与归纳[J]. 图书情报工作, 2011,55(21): 24-28.
[6][JP3] Du Jian, Tang Xiaoli. Perceptions of author order vs. contribution among researchers with different professional ranks and the potential of harmonic counts for encouraging ethical co-authorship practices[J]. Scientometrics, 2013. DOI 10.1007/s11192-012-0905-4.
[7] Hu Xiaojun, Rousseau R, Chen Jin. In those fields where multiple authorship is the rule, the h-index should be supplemented by role-based h-indices[J]. Journal of Information Science, 2010,36(1):73-85.
[8] Hagen N T. Harmonic allocation of authorship credit: source-level correction of bibliometric bias assures accurate publication and citation analysis[J]. PLoS ONE,2008,3(12):e4021.
[9] Hagen N T. Harmonic publication and citation counting: Sharing authorship credit equitably-not equally, geometrically or arithmatically[J]. Scientometrics,2010, 84(3):785-793.
[10] Hodge S E, Greenberg D A. Publication credit[J]. Science,1981,213(4511):950.
[11] Price DDS. Multiple authorship[J]. Science, 1981,212(4498):986.
[12] Hagen N T. Credit for coauthors[J]. Science, 2009, 323(5914): 583.
[13] 高晓培,潘云涛,马峥.科技期刊论文署名规范化探讨与实践研究[J].编辑学报,2012, 24(1):30-33.
[14] ICMJE. Uniform requirements for manuscripts submitted to biomedical journals[EB/OL].[2012-12-11]. http://www.icmje.org/urm_main.html.
[15] Smith E, Williams J B. Authorship and responsibility in health sciences research: A review of procedures for fairly allocating authorship in multi-author studies[J]. Sci Eng Ethics, 2012,18(2):199-212.
[16] Zhang C T. A proposal for calculating weighted citations based on author rank[J]. EMBO Report, 2009,10(5):416-417.
[17] Liu X Z, Fang H. Fairly sharing the credit of multi-authored papers and its application in the modification of h-index and g-index.[J] Scientometrics, 2012, 91(1):37-49.
[18] Hu X J. Loads of special authorship functions: Linear growth in the percentage of "equal first authors" and corresponding authors[J]. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 2009, 60(11):2378-2381.
[19] Akhabue E, Lautenbach E. "Equal" contributions and credit: An emerging trend in the characterization of authorship[J]. Annals of Epidemiology, 2010, 20(11):868-871.
[20] Tao T Z, Bo L L, Wang F, et al. Equal contributions and credit given to authors in anesthesiology journals during a 10-year period[J]. Scientometrics, 2012, 91(11):1005-1010.
[21] Wang F, Tang L, Bo L L, et al. Equal contributions and credit given to authors in critical care medicine journals during a 10-yr period[J]. Critical Care Medicine, 2012, 40(3):967-969.
[22] Uddin S, Hossain L, Abbasi A. Trend and efficiency analysis of co-authorship network[J]. Scientometrics,2012, 90(2):687-699.
[23] Schubert A. A Hirsch-type index of co-author partnership ability[J]. Scientometrics,2012,91(1):303-308.
[24] Rousseau R. Comments on "A Hirsch-type index of co-author partnership ability"[J]. Scientometrics,2012, 91(1):309-310.
[25] Yan E, Ding Y. Applying centrality measures to impact analysis: A coauthorship network analysis[J].Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 2009, 60(10): 2107-2118.
[26] Abbasia A, Altmannb J, Hossain L. Identifying the effects of co-authorship networks on the performance of scholars: A correlation and regression analysis of performance measures and social network analysis measures[J]. Journal of Informetrics,2011,5(4):594-607.
[27] Abbasi A. Egocentric analysis of co-authorship network structure,position and performance[J]. Information Processing & Management,2012, 48(4): 671-679.
[28] Abbasi A, Hossain L, Wigand R."Social capital and individual performance: A study of academic collaboration"[EB/OL].[2013-03-16].http://works.bepress.com/alireza_abbasi/21.
[29] Krumov L, Fretter C, Hannemann M M, et al. Motifs in co-authorship networks and their relation to the impact of scientific publications[J].European Physical Journal B, 2011, 84(4):535-540.
[30] Chien Hsiang Liaoa, Hsiuju Rebecca Yenb. Quantifying the degree of research collaboration: A comparative study of collaborative measures[J]. Journal of Informetrics,2012,6(1):27-33.
[31] 段宇锋,刘璇.社会网络分析运用于学术人才挖掘的研究[J].重庆大学学报(社会科学版),2011,17(5):80-83.
[32] 邱均平,马凤.微观层次的引用与合作之间关系的研究——以三位中国图书情报学核心作者为例[J].情报理论与实践,2011(10):43-47.
[33] 丁洁兰. 科研人员学术影响力二维测度研究[D].北京:中国科学院研究生院,2011.
[34] Lievrouw L A, Rogers E M, Lowe C U, et al. Triangulation as a research strategy for identifying invisible colleges among biomedical sciences[J]. Social Networks, 1987,9(3):217-238.
[35] White H D, Wellman B, Nazer N. Does citation reflect social structure?: Longitudinal evidence from the "Globenet" interdisciplinary research group[J]. Journal of the American Society for Information and Technology, 2004, 55(2): 111-126.
[36] Marion L S, Garfield E, Hargens L L, et al. Social network analysis and citation network analysis: Complementary approaches to the study of scientific communication[C].Proceeding of the 66th Annual Meeting of the American Society for Information and Technology, 2003, 40: 486-487.
[37] Sonnenwald D. Scientific collaboration: A synthesis of challenges and strategies[J].Annual Review of Information Science and Technology, 2007,41: 643-681.
[38] Granovetter M S. The strength of weak ties[J]. American Journal of Sociology,1973,78(6): 1360-1380.
[39] Zhao S X, Rousseau R, Ye F Y. h-Degree as a basic measure in weighted networks[J]. Journal of Informetrics,2011,5(4):668-677.
/
| 〈 |
|
〉 |
