[目的/意义]将用户使用行为纳入百科词条评价体系中，从多维度视角对百度百科词条进行综合评价。[方法/过程]结合国内外学者的研究成果，基于4个维度，选取了12项量化指标作为研究指标，对百度百科词条作了综合评价。[结果/结论]用户使用行为指标与链接指标在词条综合评价中起到相对重要的作用；研究丰富了百科词条研究的评价体系，但局限是未考虑丰富度、严谨性等难以准确量化的特征。
[Purpose/significance] The study incorporates user behavior into the encyclopedia entry evaluation system, and comprehensively evaluates Baidu Encyclopedia entries from a multi-dimensional perspective.[Method/process] From four dimensions, the study selected 12 quantitative indicators as research indicators, and comprehensively evaluated Baidu Encyclopedia entries.[Result/conclusion] User use behavior indicators and link indicators play a relatively important role in comprehensive evaluation of entries; This study enriches the evaluation system of encyclopedia entry research, but the limitation is that it is difficult to accurately quantify without considering richness and rigor. Characteristics.
[1] WIKIPEDIA. Article assessment[EB/OL].[2018-10-29].https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Article_assessment_(historical).
[2] STVILIA B, FARAJ A, YI Y J. Issues of cross-contextual information quality evaluation-the case of arabic, english, and korean Wikipediaes[J]. Library & information science research, 2009, 31(4):232-239.
[3] LICHTENSTEIN S, PARKER C M. Wikipedia model for collective intelligence:a review of information quality[J]. International journal of knowledge and learning, 2009, 5(3/4):254-272.
[4] ARAZY O, NOV O, PATTERSON R, et al. Information quality in Wikipedia:the effects of group composition and task conflict[J]. Journal of management information systems, 2011, 27(4):71-98.
[5] LIU J, RAM S. Who does what:collaboration patterns in the Wikipedia and their impact on article quality[J]. ACM transactions on management information systems, 2011, 2(2):1-23.
[6] YAARI E, BARUCHSON-ARBIB S, BAR-ILAN J. Information quality assessment of community generated content:a user study of Wikipedia.[J]. Journal of information science, 2011, 37(5):487-498.
[7] OSMAN K. The role of conflict in determining consensus on quality in Wikipedia articles[C]//International symposium on open collaboration. New York:ACM, 2013:1-6.
[8] LEWANDOWSKI D, SPREE U. Ranking of Wikipedia articles in search engines revisited:fair ranking for reasonable quality?[J]. Journal of the American Society for Information Science & Technology, 2014, 62(1):117-132.
[9] 丁敬达.维基百科词条信息质量启发式评价框架研究[J].图书情报知识, 2014(2):11-17.
[10] 赵文轩.网络百科资源质量探析[J].图书馆理论与实践, 2016(4):38-42.
[11] 黄令贺.网络百科信息质量动态演进探索研究[J].情报理论与实践, 2018(2):127-131
[12] LIH A. Wikipedia as Participatory journalism:reliable sources? metrics for evaluating collaborative media as a news resource[C]//Proceedings of the 5th international symposium on online journalism. Austin:ISOJ,2004:16-17.
[13] CHEVALIER F, HUOT S, FEKETE J D. Wikipedia viz:conveying article quality for casual Wikipedia readers[C]//Pacific visualization symposium. Taipei:IEEE, 2010:215-222.
[14] 金燕,周婷,詹丽华.基于层次分析法的协同内容创建系统质量评价体系研究——以百度百科为例[J].图书馆理论与实践, 2015(7):41-45.
[15] 张博,乔欢.协同知识生产社区的内容质量评估模型研究——以维基百科为例[J].现代情报,2015,35(10):17-22.
[16] 金燕.基于用户体验的协同内容创建系统质量保证措施——以百度百科为例[J].情报理论与实践,2016,39(3):6-9.
[17] WARNCKEWANG M, COSLEY D, RIEDL J. Tell me more:an actionable quality model for Wikipedia[C]//International symposium on open collaboration. New York:ACM, 2013:1-10.
[18] STVILIA B, TWIDALE M B, SMITH L C, et al. Assessing information quality of a community-based encyclopedia[C]//International conference on information quality. Cambridge:ICIQ, 2005:442-454.
[19] BLUMENSTOCK J E. Size matters:word count as a measure of quality on Wikipedia[C]//International conference on World Wide Web. New York:ACM, 2008:1095-1096.
[20] DALIP D H, CRISTO M. Automatic quality assessment of content created collaboratively by web communities:a case study of Wikipedia[C]//ACM/IEEE-CS joint conference on Digital libraries. New York:ACM, 2009:295-304.
[21] CALZADA G D L, DEKHTYAR A. On measuring the quality of Wikipedia articles[C]//Workshop on Information credibility. New York:ACM, 2010:11-18.
[22] 裘江南,翁楠,徐胜国.基于C4.5的维基百科页面信息质量评价模型研究[J].情报学报, 2012, 31(12):1259-1264.
[23] 李欣奕.网络百科条目质量评价研究[D].长沙:国防科学技术大学, 2014.
[24] 仝召娟,许鑫.百度百科网页质量的自动化评价[J].信息资源管理学报, 2015(2):63-69.
[25] 肖奎,李兵,吴天吉.基于用户行为分析的维基百科词条质量评价方法[J].情报杂志, 2015(5):185-189.
[26] HU M, LIM E, SUN A, et al. Measuring article quality in Wikipedia:models and evaluation[C]//Conference on information and knowledge management. New York:ACM, 2007:243-252.
[27] ZENG H, ALHOSSAINI M A, DING L, et al. Computing trust from revision history[C]//International conference on privacy, security and trust:bridge the gap between PST technologies and business services. New York:ACM, 2006:1-1.
[28] LIM E, VUONG B, LAUW H W, et al. Measuring qualities of articles contributed by online communities[C]//IEEE/WIC/ACM International conference on Web intelligence. Washington DC:IEEE, 2006:81-87.
[29] DONDIO P, BARRETT S. Computational trust in web content quality:a comparative evaluation on the Wikipedia project[J]. Informatica, 2007, 31(2):151-160.
[30] WOHNER T, PETERS R. Assessing the quality of Wikipedia articles with lifecycle based metrics[C]//International symposium on Wikis. Orlando:DBLP, 2009:1-10.
[31] JAVANMARDI S, LOPES C. Statistical measure of quality in Wikipedia[C]//Proceedings of the first workshop on social media analytics. New York:ACM, 2010:132-138.
[32] YU S, YOSHIKAWA M. Assessing quality score of Wikipedia article using mutual evaluation of editors and texts[C]//ACM International conference on information & knowledge management. New York:ACM, 2013:1727-1732.
[33] LI X, TANG J, WANG T, et al. Automatically assessing Wikipedia article quality by exploiting article-editor networks[C]//Advances in Information Retrieval, ECIR. Gewerbestrasse:Springer, Cham, 2015:574-580.
[34] WILKINSON D.M, HUBERMAN B.A. Cooperation and quality in Wikipedia[C]//International symposium on Wikis. New York:ACM, 2007:157-164.
[35] 肖奎,罗保山,吴天吉.一种限定领域的网络文档资源质量评价方法——以维基百科为例[J].情报理论与实践, 2016, 39(12):120-123.
[36] WU K, ZHU Q, ZHAO Y, et al. Mining the factors affecting the quality of Wikipedia articles[C]//International conference of information science and management engineering. Washington DC:IEEE, 2010:343-346.
[37] 刘思峰,蔡华,杨英杰,等.灰色关联分析模型研究进展[J].系统工程理论与实践, 2013, 33(8):2041-2046.
[38] 倪九派, 李萍, 魏朝富,等.基于AHP和熵权法赋权的区域土地开发整理潜力评价[J].农业工程学报, 2009, 25(5):202-209.
