图书情报工作

图书情报工作 >

2018 , Vol. 62 >Issue 20: 133 - 141

DOI: https://doi.org/10.13266/j.issn.0252-3116.2018.20.015

综述述评

图书情报学(LIS)领域的循证科学研究进展

  • 卜玉敏 ,
  • 曲建升
展开
  • 1. 中国科学院兰州文献情报中心 兰州 730000;
    2. 中国科学院大学 北京 100049
卜玉敏(ORCID:0000-0003-0203-3802),硕士研究生

收稿日期: 2018-01-31

  修回日期: 2018-07-05

  网络出版日期: 2018-10-20

基金资助

本文系国家自然科学基金面上项目"气候变化科学成果集成研究范式及其实现平台研究"（项目编号：41671535）研究成果之一。

收起

Research Progress of Evidence-based Science in Library and Information Science (LIS)

  • Bu Yumin ,
  • Qu Jiansheng
Expand
  • 1. Lanzhou Library, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Lanzhou 730000;
    2. University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100049

Received date: 2018-01-31

  Revised date: 2018-07-05

  Online published: 2018-10-20

Fold

摘要

[目的/意义]从文献内容角度了解图书情报学（LIS）领域对循证科学的研究进展，重点分析主要的研究主题及近年研究方向，同时进行国际与国内的对比。[方法/过程]从Web of Science核心合集、CNKI和万方数据库的核心期刊中检索LIS领域关于循证科学的研究。使用内容分析法，从年发文量、所属学科领域对目标文献集进行统计分析，并重点从学科交叉研究、LIS学科职能及其研究对象两种视角分析其研究主题及近5年的研究主题，同时进行国际与国内对比。[结果/结论]LIS领域的循证科学研究涉及医学、护理及卫生保健、政策科学、信息系统、教育学等多个学科领域；最终将LIS领域关于循证科学的主要研究主题总结为10类，其中"图情机构服务及图书馆员的专业发展"和"证据来源及获取方法、技术"为核心主题；无论是从涉及的学科领域及主题的广度还是对各主题研究的深度而言，国内均相对较弱。

关键词： 图书情报学; 循证科学; 内容分析法

本文引用格式

卜玉敏 , 曲建升 . 图书情报学(LIS)领域的循证科学研究进展[J]. 图书情报工作, 2018 , 62(20) : 133 -141 . DOI: 10.13266/j.issn.0252-3116.2018.20.015

Abstract

[Purpose/significance] The paper aims to learn about the progress of the studies on evidence-based science in library and information science (LIS) discipline from the literature content, with a focus on the major research themes and research directions in recent years, and the domestic and international research progress is compared.[Method/process] From the core collection of Web of Science and Chinese core journals from CNKI and Wanfang database, a search for the evidence-based science research in the field of LIS is performed. Utilizing content analysis method, the paper makes statistical analysis on the target literature from the year of publication and the subject area; then the paper puts its focus on the research theme analysis and hot topics in the past five years from two perspectives of interdisciplinary research, and the subject function of LIS and the objects.[Result/conclusion] Researches on evidence-based science in the field of LIS involve a number of subject areas including medicine, nursing and health care, policy science, information systems and education. The main research themes on evidence-based science in LIS are summarized into 10 categories in the end, of which "Services of LIS Institutions and Librarians' Professional Development" and "Evidence Sources and Its Access Methods or Technologies" are viewed as the core topics. China is relatively weak whether in terms of the breadth of subject areas and themes covered or the depth of research on each theme.

Key words： library and information science (LIS); evidence-based science; content analysis method

参考文献

[1] 张云昊. 循证政策的发展历程、内在逻辑及其建构路径[J]. 中国行政管理, 2017(11):73-78.
[2] SHEN J T, YAO L Y, LI Y P, et al. Visualizing the history of evidence-based medicine:a bibliometric analysis[J]. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 2013, 64(10):2157-2172.
[3] 李幼平. 循证医学[M]. 北京:高等教育出版社, 2009.
[4] PARTRIDGE H, LEE J, MUNRO C. Becoming "librarian 2.0":the skills, knowledge, and attributes required by library and information science professionals in a Web 2.0 world (and beyond)[J]. Library trends, 2010, 59(1/2):315-335.
[5] 陈静, 金胜勇. 对图书馆学体系结构的再认识[J]. 图书馆, 2014(6):42-45.
[6] 金胜勇, 石璐鸣. 基于演绎逻辑的图书馆学发展趋势分析——兼论归纳逻辑的局限[J]. 图书馆, 2014(5):1-5, 9.
[7] 钟丽萍, 罗世猛. 情报研究有效性评价的相关概念及理论构建[J]. 情报理论与实践, 2014, 37(2):9-13.
[8] 杨秀丹, 闫慧丽. EBLIP研究综述[J]. 情报探索, 2011(2):15-17.
[9] 王翩然, 徐建华, 俞碧飏. 循证图书馆信息实践(EBLIP)研究综述[J]. 情报学报, 2016, 35(1):98-112.
[10] KOUFOGIANNAKIS D, SLATER L, CRUMLEY E. A content analysis of librarianship research[J]. Journal of information science, 2004, 30(3):227-239.
[11] GILLESPIE A, PARTRIDGE H, BRUCE C, et al. The experience of evidence-based practice in an Australian public library:an ethnography[J]. Information research, 2016, 21(4):730-765.
[12] PARTRIDGE H, THORPE C, EDWARDS S. The practitioner's experience and conception of evidence based library and information practice:an exploratory analysis[J]. Philosophy, 2007, 41(5):892-904.
[13] BATES M J. The invisible substrate of information science[J]. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 1999, 50(12):1043-1050.
[14] MCKIBBON K A, WILCZYNSKI N, HAYWARD R S, et al. The medical literature as a resource for health care practice[J]. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 1995, 46(10):737-742.
[15] 吴庭照, 李秉严. 循证医学的信息研究方法[J]. 四川图书馆学报, 1999(3):49-52.
[16] 杨文登. 循证实践:一种新的实践形态?[J]. 自然辩证法研究, 2010, 26(4):106-110.
[17] 张克菊, 韩毅. 基于循证理念的科技情报工作研究[J]. 情报杂志, 2010(2):10-13, 19.
[18] 钟丽萍, 冷伏海, 张云秋. 基于证据基础的EBPP与情报研究的关系剖析[J]. 情报资料工作, 2012(4):29-32.
[19] 钟丽萍, 冷伏海, 罗世猛. 情报研究有效性的影响因素分析[J]. 情报理论与实践, 2013(7):6-9.
[20] 顾骏. 基于循证科学理念的知识服务模式——循证知识服务构建[J]. 情报理论与实践, 2011(10):22-23,16.
[21] GILLESPIE A. Untangling the evidence:introducing an empirical model for evidence-based library and information practice[J]. Information research, 2014, 19(3):56-81.
[22] MILLER F, PARTRIDGE H, BRUCE C, et al. How academic librarians experience evidence-based practice:a grounded theory model[J]. Library & information science research, 39(2):124-130.
[23] 王璞, 邓婉昕, 刘芳,等. 国外医院图书馆知识服务发展初探[J]. 图书馆理论与实践, 2016(1):6-11.
[24] CUMMING L, CONWAY L. Providing comprehensive information and searches with limited resources[J]. Journal of information science, 1998, 24(3):183-185.
[25] 钟丽萍, 冷伏海. 面向知识服务的循证医学网络资源组织[J].图书情报工作, 2009, 53(12):37-40.
[26] YIM W W, KWAN S W, YETISGEN M. Classifying tumor event attributes in radiology reports[J]. Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology, 2017, 68(11):2662-2674.
[27] 蓝海波. 灰色文献的价值——来自政策信息领域的研究与实践[J]. 国家图书馆学刊, 2016(2):54-59.
[28] SMITH J. The evidence base:where is it?[J]. Australian library journal, 2009, 58(1):28-38.
[29] LAWRENCE A, THOMAS J, HOUGHTON J, et al. Collecting the evidence:improving access to grey literature and data for public policy and practice[J]. Australian academic & research libraries, 46(4):229-248.
[30] KOUSSOURIS S, LAMPATHAKI F, KOKKINAKOS P, et al. Accelerating policy making 2.0:innovation directions and research perspectives as distilled from four standout cases[J]. Government information quarterly, 2015, 32(2):142-153.
[31] GIL-GARCIA J R, ZHANG J, PURON-CID G. Conceptualizing smartness in government:an integrative and multi-dimensional view[J]. Government information quarterly, 2016, 33(3):524-534.
[32] EDWARDS P, FARRINGTON J H, MELLISH C, et al. e-Social science and evidence-based policy assessment challenges and solutions[J]. Social science computer review, 2009, 27(4):553-568.
[33] MAKKAR S R, BRENNAN S, TURNER T, et al. The development of SAGE:a tool to evaluate how policymakers' engage with and use research in health policymaking[J]. Research evaluation, 2016, 25(3):315-328.
[34] HJORLAND B. Is classification necessary after Google?[J]. Journal of documentation, 2012, 68(3):299-317.
[35] URQUHART C. Systematic reviewing, meta-analysis and meta-synthesis for evidence-based library and information science[EB/OL].[2018-06-10]. http://www.informationr.net/ir/15-3/colis7/colis708.html.
[36] SHEBLE L. Research synthesis methods and library and information science:shared problems, limited diffusion[J]. Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology, 2016, 67(8):1990-2008.
[37] SHEBLE L. Macro-level diffusion of a methodological knowledge innovation:research synthesis methods, 1972-2011[J]. Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology, 68(12):2693-2708.
[38] BOELL S K, CECEZ-KECMANOVIC D. Debating systematic literature reviews (SLR) and their ramifications for IS:a rejoinder to Mike Chiasson, Briony Oates, Ulrike Schultze, and Richard Watson[J]. Journal of information technology, 2015, 30(2):188-193.
[39] PARE G, TRUDEL M C, JAANA M, et al. Synthesizing information systems knowledge:a typology of literature reviews[J]. Information & management, 2015, 52(2):183-199.
[40] 邱璇. 系统综述——一种更科学和客观的综述方法[J]. 图书情报知识, 2010(1):15-19.
[41] 张丽华, 曲建升, 王勤花,等. 国外定性综合集成方法研究述评[J]. 图书情报工作, 2012, 56(2):66-70.
[42] 张世佳, 曲建升, 王雪梅. 元分析在学科定量集成研究中的应用及进展[J]. 图书情报工作, 2014, 58(18):131-137.
[43] 卜玉敏, 曲建升. Meta分析在成果集成研究中的应用与发展[J]. 情报杂志, 2017, 36(12):63-68.
[44] 张晓林. 颠覆性变革与后图书馆时代——推动知识服务的供给侧结构性改革[J]. 中国图书馆学报, 2018(1):1-12.
Options
文章导航

/

〈 〉