收稿日期: 2016-07-06
修回日期: 2016-08-20
网络出版日期: 2016-09-05
基金资助
本文系国家社会科学基金年度项目"我国跨系统区域图书馆联盟建设与发展实证研究"(项目编号:14BTQ006)研究成果之一。
Practice and Enlightenment of LYRASIS-Typical Sample of Merger of Cross-system Library Consortia in U.S.
Received date: 2016-07-06
Revised date: 2016-08-20
Online published: 2016-09-05
[目的/意义] LYRASIS是在美国经济危机背景下由多个联盟合并而成,是联盟大合作、大协作的典型样本。国内跨系统联盟发展遇到瓶颈,通过对LYRASIS的实践调研分析,对我国跨系统联盟建设提出建议。[方法/过程] 通过LYRASIS等相关网站、数据库检索获取相关文献、LYRASIS相关人员的邮件等调研,获得LYRASIS联盟的翔实数据资料。[结果/结论] 调研发现:LYRASIS成员馆类型多样,有多元的资金来源,开展多样化的服务与项目合作,拥有很强的技术服务竞争优势,制定成员馆需求驱动的战略规划。提出国内跨系统区域联盟需要调整联盟运作模式,争取多元资金来源渠道,形成有竞争力的硬性优势,做好战略规划,促进区域间联盟合作。
金洁琴 , 赵乃瑄 . 美国跨系统图书馆联盟合并典型LYRASIS的实践及启示[J]. 图书情报工作, 2016 , 60(17) : 33 -39 . DOI: 10.13266/j.issn.0252-3116.2016.17.005
[Purpose/significance] LYRASIS was formed by the merger of multiple consortia under the background of the U.S. economic crisis, and is a typical sample of consortia with big cooperation and collaboration. Domestic cross-system consortia has met development bottleneck. Through the survey analysis of LYRASIS practice, this paper puts forward suggestions for construction of cross-system consortia in China. [Method/process] Through surveying LYRASIS and related websites, retrieving database to access relevant literature and mailing to LYRASIS relevant personnel, this paper obtains detailed data on the development of LYRASIS.[Result/conclusion] Studies show that LYRASIS has members of various types and diversified sources of funds, carries out diversified services and project cooperation, has strong competitive advantage of technical service, and makes members demand driven strategy plan. This paper further points out that domestic cross-system consortia needs to adjust the consortia operation mode, strive for multiple channels of funding sources, form competitive advantage and make strategic planning to promote the regional cooperation among consortia.
Key words: LYRASIS; library consortia; consortia merger; big collaboration
[1] 吴建中.新常态下图书馆联盟发展的新课题[J].新世纪图书馆,2015(1):5-8,17.
[2] HORTON V. Whither library consortia?[J]. Collaborative librarianship, 2013,5 (3):150-153.
[3] HORTON V, PRONEVITZ G. Library consortia:models for collaboration and sustainability[M]. Chicago: ALA Editions,2015.
[4] JOHNSON S. Future perfect: the case for progress in a networked age[M]. New York: Penguin (Riverhead),2012.
[5] NORMAN O,ANDREW A, JOSH H. SOLINET+PALINET=LYRASIS[J]. Library journal, 2009,134(4):16.
[6] NORMAN O, LYNN B, BARBARA G, et al. BCR members to join LYRASIS[J]. Library journal, 2010,135(8):12.
[7] ANDERSON K. LYRASIS: a collaborative success story[J]. Collaborative librarianship, 2010,2(2): 105-108.
[8] LYRASIS[EB/OL].[2015-04-05].http://www.lyrasis.org/Pages/Main.aspx.
[9] LYRASIS member dues[EB/OL].[2016-05-10].http://www.lyrasis.org/membership/Pages/Becoming%20a%20Member/Member-Dues.aspx.
[10] LYRASIS推出FOSS4LIB,为图书馆提供开源软件指导[J].现代图书情报技术,2012(3):77.
[11] SCOAP 3[EB/OL].[2016-06-18]. https://scoap3.org.
[12] Open Library of Humanities[EB/OL].[2016-06-18]. https://www.openlibhums.org.
[13] LYRASIS. LYRASIS 2020: the membership survey 2015[EB/OL].[2016-05-10].http://www.lyrasis.org/membership/Documents/2020-Membership-Survey.pdf.
[14] OCLC.U.S. library consortia: a snapshot of priorities & perspectives[EB/OL].[2015-10-10].http://www.oclc.org/reports/us-consortia.en.html.
[15] 孔凡莲,高波.加拿大图书馆联盟战略规划实践及启示[J].图书馆建设,2014(10):62-69.
/
〈 | 〉 |