图书情报工作

图书情报工作 >

2016 , Vol. 60 >Issue 3: 138 - 147

DOI: https://doi.org/10.13266/j.issn.0252-3116.2016.03.020

综述述评

科研人员在线社交网络使用行为研究综述

  • 张耀坤 ,
  • 胡方丹 ,
  • 刘继云
展开
  • 1. 南昌航空大学经济管理学院 南昌 330063;
    2. 东莞理工学院经济贸易系 东莞 523808
张耀坤(ORCID:0000-0002-0393-9780),讲师,博士,E-mail:yaokunzhang@nchu.edu.cn;胡方丹(ORCID:0000-0002-5072-7377),硕士研究生;刘继云(ORCID:0000-0001-9085-0794),教授,博士。

收稿日期: 2015-12-03

  修回日期: 2016-01-20

  网络出版日期: 2016-02-05

基金资助

本文系江西省社会科学规划项目"社会网络环境下的用户信息行为研究"(项目编号:14TQ12)和广东省科技计划项目"高新区科技信息公共服务平台关键技术研究"(项目编号:2010A010100003)研究成果之一。

收起

A review on Researchers' Behaviors on Social Network Sites

  • Zhang Yaokun ,
  • Hu Fangdan ,
  • Liu Jiyun
Expand
  • 1. School of Economics & Management, Nanchang Hangkong University, Nanchang 330063;
    2. Department of Economics and Trade, Dongguan University of Technology, Dongguan 523808

Received date: 2015-12-03

  Revised date: 2016-01-20

  Online published: 2016-02-05

Fold

摘要

[目的/意义]归纳总结科研人员在线社交网络使用行为研究现状,提出值得关注的问题,为进一步深入研究提供参考。[方法/过程]通过关键词检索和引文追溯两步骤的文献收集方法系统收集国内外相关文献,对文献进行系统阅读、分析,归纳研究主题,并进行论述。[结果/结论]将收集到的63篇文献按照其研究主题,归纳为用于科研目的的在线社交网络功能与分类、科研人员在线社交网络使用的人口统计学特征研究、使用动机研究、内容创建和获取行为研究以及群体行为研究。认为未来深入研究可以从在线社交网络科研过程嵌入机理、基于全局数据的行为规律研究、持续使用机制及信息服务系统改进实证研究4个方面进行。

关键词： 科研人员; 学术社交网络; 社交媒体; 信息行为

本文引用格式

张耀坤 , 胡方丹 , 刘继云 . 科研人员在线社交网络使用行为研究综述[J]. 图书情报工作, 2016 , 60(3) : 138 -147 . DOI: 10.13266/j.issn.0252-3116.2016.03.020

Abstract

[Purpose/significance] This study aims to summarize the research status of researchers'behaviors on social network sites and to propose several noteworthy research directions for the future study. [Method/process] We use a two- stage method including keywords search and citation trackback to collect literatures on this topic followed with a systematical and profound analysis. [Result/conclusion] The collection composed of 63 articles, which can be classified into 5 categories including the functionalities and types of SNS for academic purpose, demographic characteristics, motivations, content generation and access behaviors, and group interaction behaviors. It is concluded that the future researches can be carried out in 4 areas including:1) the embedding mechanism of SNS in research processes; 2) the behavior based on global data; 3) the mechanism of continuous usage of SNS by researchers; 4) the empirical studies of socialization of S&T information system.

Key words： researchers; academic social network sites; social media; information behavior

参考文献

[1] BOYD D M, ELLISON N B. Social network sites:definition, history, and scholarship[J]. Journal of computer-mediated communication, 2008, 13(1):210-230.
[2] AHN J. The effect of social network sites on adolescents' social and academic development:current theories and controversies[J]. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 2011, 62(8):1435-1445.
[3] COLLINS E, HIDE B. Use and relevance of Web 2.0 resources for researchers[EB/OL].[2015-10-30]. http://elpub.scix.net/data/works/att/119_elpub2010.content.pdf?origin=publication_detail.
[4] GIGLIA E. Academic social networks:it's time to change the way we do research[J]. European journal of physical and rehabilitation medicine, 2011, 47(2):345-350.
[5] OVADIA S. Research gate and academia.edu:academic social networks[J]. Behavioral & social sciences librarian, 2014, 33(3):165-169.
[6] GRUZD A, STAVES K, WILK A. Connected scholars:examining the role of social media in research practices of faculty using the UTAUT model[J]. Computers in human behavior, 2012, 28(6):2340-2350.
[7] 任全娥. 数字化学术期刊的产业链分析与共赢模式构想——由"独家授权协议"引起的思考[J]. 情报资料工作, 2012, 33(3):60-64.
[8] RICHTER A, KOCH M. Functions of social networking services[EB/OL].[2015-10-30]. http://coop.wineme.fb5.uni-siegen.de/proceedings2008/3_01_aRichter_al_87-98.pdf.
[9] BULLINGER A C, HALLERSTEDE S H, RENKEN U, et al. Towards research collaboration-a taxonomy of social research network sites[EB/OL].[2015-10-30]. http://www.wi1.fau.de/sites/wi1.uni-erlangen.de/files/Bullinger_Hallerstede_Renken_Soeldner_Moeslein_2010_Towards_Research_Collaboration_-_a_Taxonomy_of_SRNS_AMCIS2010.pdf.
[10] REBIUN. Science 2.0:the use of social networking in research[EB/OL].[2015-10-30]. http://eprints.rclis.org/16162/1/Science20_rebiun_2011.pdf.
[11] 李玲丽,吴新年,张甫. 开放型科研社交网络应用调查与分析——以Academia.edu为例[J]. 情报资料工作, 2013(1):90-93.
[12] 陈明红,漆贤军,刘莹. 科研社交网络使用行为的影响因素研究[J]. 情报理论与实践, 2015(10):73-79.
[13] ROHANI V A, OW S H. Eliciting essential requirements for social networks in academic environments[EB/OL].[2015-10-30]. http://repository.um.edu.my/10995/1/ISCI2011-March-2011.pdf.
[14] 夏秋菊,栗文超,薛晶晶,等. 面向学术领域的新型社交平台:科研社交网络[J]. 情报杂志, 2014(9):167-172.
[15] MAS BLEDA A, THELWALL M, KOUSHA K, et al. European highly cited scientists' presence in the social Web[EB/OL].[2015-10-30]. http://www.researchgate.net/profile/Amalia_Mas-Bleda/publication/257098051_European_Highly_Cited_Scientists_Presence_in_the_Social_Web/links/0c960524569ffd1474000000?ev=pub_ext_doc_dl_meta.
[16] MAS-BLEDA A, THELWALL M, KOUSHA K, et al. Do highly cited researchers successfully use the social Web?[J]. Scientometrics, 2014, 101(1):337-356.
[17] ELSAYED A M. The use of academic social networks among arab researchers:a survey[J]. Social science computer review, 2015(6):1-14.
[18] ROWLANDS I, NICHOLAS D, RUSSELL B, et al. Social media use in the research workflow[J]. Learned publishing, 2011, 24(3):183-195.
[19] NICHOLAS D, ROWLANDS I. Social media use in the research workflow[J]. Information services & use, 2011, 31(1-2):61-83.
[20] LUPTON D. 'Feeling better connected':academics' use of social media[EB/OL].[2015-10-30]. http://pc.qq.com/nofind/?StatusCode=403&&Url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.canberra.edu.au%2Ffaculties%2Farts-design%2Fattachments%2Fpdf%2Fn-and-mrc%2FFeeling-Better-Connected-report-final.pdf.
[21] VAN NOORDEN R. Online collaboration:scientists and the social network[J]. Nature, 2014, 512(7513):126-129.
[22] MAHAJAN P, SINGH H, KUMAR A, et al. Use of SNSs by the researchers in India[J]. Library review, 2013, 6(8/9):525-546.
[23] ORTEGA J L. Disciplinary differences in the use of academic social networking sites[J]. Online information review, 2015, 39(4):520-536.
[24] MAS-BLEDA A, THELWALL M, KOUSHA K, et al. Do highly cited researchers successfully use the social Web[J]. Scientometrics, 2014, 101(1):337-356.
[25] WILSON T D. Human information behavior[J]. Informing science, 2000, 3(2):49-56.
[26] MEGWALU A. Academic social networking:a case study on users' information behavior[J]. Advances in librarianship, 2015, 39(6):185-214.
[27] AL-AUFI A S, FULTON C. Use of social networking tools for informal scholarly communication in humanities and social sciences disciplines[J]. Procedia-social and behavioral sciences, 2014, 147:436-445.
[28] AL-AUFI A, FULTON C. Impact of social networking tools on scholarly communication:a cross-institutional study[J]. Electronic library, 2015, 33(2):224-241.
[29] BAR-LLAN J, HAUSTEIN S, PETERS I, et al. Beyond citations:scholars' visibility on the social web[EB/OL].[2015-10-30]. http://arxiv.org/ftp/arxiv/papers/1205/1205.5611.pdf.
[30] THELWALL M, KOUSHA K. Research gate:disseminating, communicating, and measuring scholarship?[J]. Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology, 2015, 66(5):876-889.
[31] CHAKRABORTY N. Activities and reasons for using social networking sites by research scholars in NEHU:a study on Facebook and Research Gate[EB/OL].[2015-10-30]. http://ir.inflibnet.ac.in/bitstream/1944/1666/1/3.pdf.
[32] JENG W, HE D, JIANG J. User participation in an academic social networking service:a survey of open group users on mendeley[J]. Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology, 2015, 66(5):890-904.
[33] NICHOLAS D, HERMAN E, JAMALI H, et al. New ways of building, showcasing, and measuring scholarly reputation[J]. Learned publishing, 2015, 28(3):169-183.
[34] THELWALL M, KOUSHA K. Academia.edu:social network or academic network?[J]. Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology, 2014, 65(4):721-731.
[35] GRUZD A, GOERTZEN M. Wired academia:why social science scholars are using social media[C]//Proceedings of the 201346th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences (HICSS).Washington:IEEE Computer Society, 2013:3332-3341.
[36] 陈明红,漆贤军. 社会资本视角下的学术虚拟社区知识共享研究[J]. 情报理论与实践, 2014(9):101-105.
[37] 甘春梅. 学术博客用户行为及其影响因素研究.[D]. 武汉:华中师范大学, 2013.
[38] 王伟军,甘春梅. 学术博客持续使用意愿的影响因素研究[J]. 科研管理, 2014, 35(10):121-127.
[39] 杨善林,王佳佳,代宝,等. 在线社交网络用户行为研究现状与展望[J/OL].[EB/OL].[2015-10-30]. http://www.bulletin.cas.cn/ch/reader/create_pdf.aspx?file_no=20150208.
[40] SHEMA H, BAR-LLAN J, THELWALL M. How is research blogged? a content analysis approach[J]. Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology, 2015, 66(6):1136-1149.
[41] BOWMAN T D. Differences in personal and professional tweets of scholars[J]. Aslib journal of information management, 2015, 67(3):356-371.
[42] HOLMBERG K, BOWMAN T D, HAUSTEIN S, et al. Astrophysicists' conversational connections on Twitter[J]. PLoS ONE, 2014, 9(8):e106086.
[43] HAUSTEIN S, BOWMAN T D, HOLMBERG K, et al. Astrophysicists on Twitter:an in-depth analysis of tweeting and scientific publication behavior[J]. Aslib journal of information management, 2014, 66(3):279-296.
[44] MOHAMMADI E, THELWALL M, HAUSTEIN S, et al. Who reads research articles? an altmetrics analysis of Mendeley user categories[J]. Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology, 2015, 66(9):1832-1846.
[45] BORMMANN L, HAUNSCHILD R. Which people use which scientific papers? an evaluation of data from F1000 and Mendeley[J]. Journal of informetrics, 2015, 9(3):477-487.
[46] THELWALL M, KOUSHA K. Research gate articles:age, discipline, audience size and impact[EB/OL].[2015-10-30]. http://www.scit.wlv.ac.uk/~cm1993/papers/ResearchGateArticles_preprint.pdf.
[47] JORDAN K. What do academics ask their online networks? an analysis of questions posed via academia.edu[EB/OL].[2015-10-30]. http://oro.open.ac.uk/43669/1/a42-jordan.pdf.
[48] LI L, HE D, JENG W, et al. Answer quality characteristics and prediction on an academic Q&A site:a case study on research gate[EB/OL].[2015-10-30]. http://120.52.72.38/d-scholarship.pitt.edu/c3pr90ntcsf0/25295/1/Answer.pdf.
[49] JORDAN K. Academics and their online networks:exploring the role of academic social networking sites[J/OL].[2015-10-30]. http://firstmonday.org/article/view/4937/4159.
[50] GAO H, HU C, JIANG T. An exploratory study of paper sharing in Mendeley's public groups[EB/OL].[2015-10-30]. https://www.ideals.illinois.edu/bitstream/handle/2142/73443/178_ready.pdf?sequence=2.
[51] HOFFMANN C P, LUTZ C, MECKEL M. A relational altmetric? network centrality on research gate as an indicator of scientific impact[EB/OL].[2015-10-30]. http://www.alexandria.unisg.ch/export/DL/240758.pdf.
[52] MOHAMMADI E, THELWALL M. Mendeley readership altmetrics for the social sciences and humanities:research evaluation and knowledge flows[J]. Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology, 2014, 65(8):1627-1638.
[53] MOHAMMADI E, THELWALL M, KOUSHA K. Can Mendeley bookmarks reflect readership? a survey of user motivations[EB/OL].[2015-10-30]. http://www.scit.wlv.ac.uk/~cm1993/papers/CanMendeleyBookmarksReflectReadershipSurvey_preprint.pdf.
[54] HAUSTEIN S, LARIVIÉRE V, THELWALL M, et al. Tweets vs. Mendeley readers:how do these two social media metrics differ?[J]. Information technology, 2014, 56(5):207-215.
[55] HAUSTEIN S, PETERS I, SUGIMOTO C R, et al. Tweeting biomedicine:an analysis of tweets and citations in the biomedical literature[J]. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 2014, 65(4):656-669.
[56] HAUSTEIN S, BOWMAN T D, HOLMBERG K, et al. Tweets as impact indicators:examining the implications of automated "bot" accounts on Twitter[J]. Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology, 2016, 67(1):232-238.
[57] DE WINTER J C F. The relationship between tweets, citations, and article views for PLOS ONE articles[J]. Scientometrics, 2014, 102(2):1773-1779.
[58] LI N, GILLET D. Identifying influential scholars in academic social media platforms[EB/OL].[2015-10-30]. https://halshs.archives-ouvertes.fr/file/index/docid/990287/filename/2013_Identifying_Influential_Scholars_in_Academic_Social_Media_Platforms.pdf.
[59] JIANG J, NI C, HE D, et al. Mendeley group as a new source of interdisciplinarity study[EB/OL].[2015-10-30]. http://www.cs.umass.edu/~jpjiang/papers/jcdl13.mendeley.slides.pdf.
Options
文章导航

/

〈 〉