收稿日期: 2015-10-25
修回日期: 2015-11-01
网络出版日期: 2015-11-20
基金资助
本文系国家社会科学基金项目"我国科学院系统图书馆数字资源利用状况与发展趋势研究"(项目编号:11CTQ007)研究成果之一。
Characteristics of Literature Usage in Social Sciences and Humanities in China
Received date: 2015-10-25
Revised date: 2015-11-01
Online published: 2015-11-20
[目的/意义] 分析各学科领域文献使用情况,可为图书馆开展信息资源采访工作和针对人才、机构等方面的科学评价工作提供数据支撑。[方法/过程] 以我国大陆地区主办的751种人文社会科学学术期刊为数据来源,以这些期刊在2004-2013年发表的131万篇论文为样本,以样本论文中著录的1 282万条参考文献为分析对象,对各学科文献使用情况进行分析。[结果/结论] 在人文社会科学领域,图书(34.03%)是使用率最高的文献类型,期刊使用率(33.95%)略低于图书使用率,其他类型文献使用率为32.02%。从学科角度看,人文学科学者偏爱使用图书,社会科学学者偏爱期刊,报纸和学位论文的使用学科差异性较小。从使用发展趋势来看,期刊、学位论文的使用率在逐年上升,图书使用率呈逐年下降趋势。
苏金燕 . 我国人文社会科学领域文献使用特征研究[J]. 图书情报工作, 2015 , 59(22) : 118 -123 . DOI: 10.13266/j.issn.0252-3116.2015.22.018
[Purpose/significance] This paper analyses the characteristics of literature use in social sciences and humanities in China, and then discusses the implications for the research evaluation of social sciences and humanities researchers and for the resource purchases of libraries.[Method/process] About 751 jouranls of social science and humanities, sponsored by orignizations in Mainland China, are the data sources of this paper. Mora than 12.82 million citations of 1.31 million papers published from 2004 to 2013 are taken into account.[Result/conclusion] The results show that 34.03% of the citations are books, 33.95% of the citations are journal articles, and 32.02% are resources of other types. From the discipline perspective, the use rate of books in the humanities is the highest, while the use rate of journal articles in social sciences is the highest. Using preferences of newspapers and dissertations in social sciences and humanities is not very distinct. As for using tendency, the use rate of journal articles and dissertations is rising yearly. In the meantime, the use rate of books is declining.
Key words： humanities; social sciences; literature use
[1] 张大澄. 西文期刊利用情况调查[J]. 图书情报工作, 1989(5): 28-30.
[2] 刘雪松. 2004年12种体育核心期刊参考文献统计与分析[J]. 体育学刊, 2005(5): 142-144.
[3] 俞以勤, 余农, 龚裕, 等. 对1999-2004年全国优秀博士学位论文文后参考文献的统计与分析[J].现代情报,2007(6): 212-216.
[4] 姚蓉, 廖永霞. 全国优秀博士论文参考文献分析与研究[J]. 图书馆建设, 2007(6):127-130.
[5] Huang Muhsuan, Chang Yuwei.Characteristics of research output in social sciences and humanities: From a research evaluation perspective[J]. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 2008, 59 (11): 1819-1828.
[6] 李香艳, 庞海珍. 从文后参考文献看我国食品科技人员的文献情报需求[J]. 现代情报, 2004(11): 162-163.
[7] Earle P, Vickery B. Social science literature use in the UK as indicated by citations[J]. Journal of Documentation,1969, 25(2): 123-141.
[8] Glanzel W, Schoepflin U. A bibliometrics study of reference literature in the sciences and social sciences[J]. Information Processing and Management,1996,35(3):31-44.
[9] Schaffer T. Psychology citations revisited: Behavioral research in the age of electronic resources[J]. Journal of Academic Librarianship,2004, 30(5): 354-360.
[10] Krampen G, Weiland P,Wiesenhuetter J.Citation success of different publication types:A case study on all references in psychology publications from the German-speaking countries (D-A-CH-L-L) in 2009, 2010, and 2011[J]. Scientometrics, 2015, 104(3): 827-840.
[11] Jones C, Champman M, Woods P C. The characteristics of the literature used by historians[J]. Journal of Librarianship,1972, 4(3):137-156.
[12] Archambault E, Vignola-Gagne E, Cote G, et al.Benchmarking scientific output in the social sciences and humanities:The limits of existing databases[J]. Scientometrics,2006,68(3): 329-342.
[13] 国家新闻出版广电总局. 第一批认定学术期刊名单公示[EB/OL].[2015-04-28]. http://www.gapp.gov.cn/news/1663/231784.shtml.
[14] 中华人民共和国国家质量监督检验检疫总局, 中国国家标准化管理委员会. 信息资源的内容形式和媒体类型标识[S].北京:中国标准出版社,2014.
[15] 荆林波, 王力力, 苏金燕,等. 中国人文社会科学期刊评价报告(2014)[J].中国社会科学评价,2015(1): 78-126.
[16] 汪信砚. 人文学科与社会科学的分野[N]. 光明日报, 2009-06-16(3).
[17] 余小茅. 教育学:以人文学科为学科原点的社会科学[J]. 山西大学学报(哲学社会科学版),2014(6): 80-86.
[18] 张桂华, 金林南. 思想政治教育学科具有社会科学和人文学科双重属性[J]. 教育探索,2014(9): 103-106.
[19] 李醒民. 知识的三大部类:自然科学、社会科学和人文学科[J]. 学术界,2012(8): 5-33, 286.
[20] 陈娜. 论新闻学的学科定位与新闻史的意义——从人文学科与社会科学的分合谈起[J]. 新闻知识,2011(10): 14-16.
[21] 胡立耘. "人文学科"、"社会科学"及其通称术语的由来与非规范性现象探讨[J]. 宁夏社会科学,2005(5): 154-157.
[22] Chu C Y, Wang F S.Disciplines classification and funds for basic research[J]. Management and Review of Social Sciences,2001, 4(3):7-10.
/
| 〈 |
|
〉 |
