图书情报工作

图书情报工作 >

2015 , Vol. 59 >Issue 16: 74 - 82

DOI: https://doi.org/10.13266/j.issn.0252-3116.2015.16.012

情报研究

科学论文的科学计量分析:数据、方法与用途的整合框架

  • 王贤文 ,
  • 方志超 ,
  • 胡志刚
展开
  • 大连理工大学科学学与科技管理研究所WISE实验室 大连 116024
王贤文(ORCID:0000-0002-7236-9267),副教授,E-mail:xianwenwang@dlut.edu.cn;方志超(ORCID:0000-0002-0039-2273),硕士研究生;胡志刚(ORCID:0000-0003-1835-4264),讲师。

收稿日期: 2015-07-07

  修回日期: 2015-08-05

  网络出版日期: 2015-08-20

基金资助

本文系中央高校基本科研业务费项目“连续、动态与复合的单篇论文评价体系与评价数据库的构建”(项目编号:DUT15YQ111)和科技部创新方法工作专项“科技政策研究的关键方法、工具集成与示范推广”(项目编号:2013IM010100)研究成果之一。

收起

Scientometrics Study of Scientific Literature: An Integrated Framework from Data, Methodology and Functions

  • Wang Xianwen ,
  • Fang Zhichao ,
  • Hu Zhigang
Expand
  • WISE Lab, Institute of Science of Science and S&T Management, Dalian University of Technology, Dalian 116024

Received date: 2015-07-07

  Revised date: 2015-08-05

  Online published: 2015-08-20

Fold

摘要

[目的/意义]学科体系内部的知识发展以及信息技术的突破与应用,使得科学计量学的数据对象日益充盈丰富。在科学计量学呈现出迅猛发展态势的情况下,辨析科学计量学的数据对象,对科学计量学进行方法论的梳理显得尤为重要。[方法/过程]根据科学计量学数据本身的特点及用途,将数据对象分为发文数据、引用数据、使用数据和替代计量数据四种类型,并分别探讨四大数据对象的研究意义和相互关系,梳理科学计量学的研究方法,总结研究成果。[结果/结论]在综合整理分析四大数据对象内涵、方法和意义的基础上构建出科学计量学从数据对象、研究方法到目的用途的整合分析框架,有利于科学计量学研究工作的规范化和科学化。

关键词： 科学计量学; 发文数据; 引用数据; 使用数据; 替代计量数据; 共被引分析; 耦合分析

本文引用格式

王贤文 , 方志超 , 胡志刚 . 科学论文的科学计量分析:数据、方法与用途的整合框架[J]. 图书情报工作, 2015 , 59(16) : 74 -82 . DOI: 10.13266/j.issn.0252-3116.2015.16.012

Abstract

[Purpose/significance]With the development of knowledge inside the discipline system and the breakthrough of information technology, the data objects of scientometrics study are becoming rich.In recent years, scientometrics study shows a rapid development trend in China.In this situation, to discriminate the different data objects and summarize the methodology of scientometrics becomes important.[Method/process]In this study, we classify the data objects into four types according to their features and functions, which are publish data, citation data, usage data and altmetrics data.We discuss the meanings and correlations among the four types of data objects, systemize the scientometrics research methods and summarize the related literatures.[Result/conclusion]On this basis, we construct the integrated analysis framework of scientometrics from data objects to research methodology and to functions and applications.The aim of this study is to make the scientometrics study more standardized and scientific.

Key words： scientometrics; publish data; citation data; usage data; altmetrics data; co-citation analysis; coupling analysis

参考文献

[1] Priem J, Groth P, Taraborelli D.The altmetrics collection[J/OL].[2015-06-23].http://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0048753.
[2] 王贤文,张春博,毛文莉,等.科学论文在社交网络中的传播机制研究[J].科学学研究, 2013, 31 (9): 1287-1295.
[3] Wang Xianwen, Liu Chen, Fang Zhichao, et al.From attention to citation, what and how does altmetrics work?[J].arXiv preprint, arXiv: 1409.4269, 2014.
[4] Lotka A J.The frequency distribution of scientific productivity[J].Journal of Washington Academy Sciences, 1926, 16(12): 317-323.
[5] Newman M E J.The structure of scientific collaboration networks[J].Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 2001, 98(2): 404-409.
[6] Newman M E J.Scientific collaboration networks.II.Shortest paths, weighted networks, and centrality[J/OL].[ 2015-06-23].http://journals.aps.org/pre/pdf/10.1103/PhysRevE.64.016132.
[7] 杜建,张玢,唐小利.基于作者引用与合作关系的学术影响力测度研究进展[J].图书情报工作,2013,57(8):135-140.
[8] Mitra P.Hirsch-type indices for ranking institutions scientific research output[J].Current Science, 2006, 91(11): 1439.
[9] 王贤文,丁堃,朱晓宇.中国主要科研机构的科学合作网络分析——基于Web of Science的研究[J].科学学研究,2010,28(12):1806-1812.
[10] Braun T, Glänzel W, Schubert A.Scientometric indicators: A 32 country comparative evaluation of publishing performance and citation impact[M].Singapore: World Scientific Publ.Co., 1985.
[11] Luukkonen T, Persson O, Sivertsen G.Understanding patterns of international scientific collaboration[J].Science, Technology & Human Values, 1992, 17(1): 101-126.
[12] Luukkonen T, Tijssen R, Persson O, et al.The measurement of international scientific collaboration[J].Scientometrics, 1993, 28(1): 15-36.
[13] Price D J D.Science since Babylon[M].New Haven: Yale University Press, 1962.
[14] Zipf G K.Human behavior and the principle of least effort[B].Oxford: Addison-Wesley Press,1949.
[15] Courtial J P.A coword analysis of scientometrics[J].Scientometrics, 1994, 31(3): 251-260.
[16] He Qin.Knowledge discovery through co-word analysis[J].Library trends, 1999, 48(1): 133-159.
[17] 程齐凯,王晓光.一种基于共词网络社区的科研主题演化分析框架[J].图书情报工作,2013,57(8):91-96.
[18] 王曰芬,宋爽,卢宁,等.共现分析在文本知识挖掘中的应用研究[J].中国图书馆学报, 2007(2):59-64.
[19] Wang Xianwen, Liu Di, Ding Kun.Science funding and research output:A study on 10 countries[J].Scientometrics, 2011, 91(2): 591-599.
[20] 王贤文, 刘则渊, 侯海燕.全球主要国家的科学基金及基金论文产出现状:基于Web of Science的分析[J].科学学研究, 2010, 28(1): 61-66.
[21] Price D J D.Networks of scientific papers[J].Science, 1965, 149(3683): 510-515.
[22] Kessler M M.Bibliographic coupling between scientific papers[J].American Documentation,1963,14(1) :10-25.
[23] Boyack K W, Klavans R.Co-citation analysis, bibliographic coupling, and direct citation: Which citation approach represents the research front most accurately?[J].Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 2010, 61(12): 2389-2404.
[24] Small H.Cocitation in the scientific literature: A new measure of the relationship between two documents[J].Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 1973, 24(4): 265-269.
[25] Zhao Dangzhi,Strotmann A.Evolution of research activities and intellectual influences in information science 1996–2005: Introducing author bibliographic-coupling analysis[J].Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 2008, 59(13): 2070-2086.
[26] White H D, Griffith B C.Author cocitation: A literature measure of intellectual structure[J].Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 1981, 32(3):163-171.
[27] McCain K W.Mapping authors in intellectual space: A technical overview[J].Journal of the American Society for Information Science (1986-1998), 1990, 41(6): 433-443.
[28] White H D, McCain K W.Visualizing a discipline: An author co-citation analysis of information science, 1972-1995[J].Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 1998, 49(4): 327-355.
[29] Culnan M J.The intellectual development of management information systems, 1972–1982: A co-citation analysis[J].Management Science, 1986, 32(2): 156-172.
[30] Tsay Mingyueh, Xu Hong, Wu Chiawen.Journal clustering using a bibliographic coupling method[J].Information Processing & Management, 1977, 13(5): 277-288.
[31] Tsay Mingyueh, Xu Hong, Wu Chiawen.Journal co-citation analysis of semiconductor literature[J].Scientometrics, 2003, 57(1): 7-25.
[32] McCain K W.Core journal networks and cocitation maps:New bibliometric tools for serials research and management[J].The Library Quarterly, 1991,61(3): 311-336.
[33] 王贤文, 刘则渊.基于共被引率分析的期刊分类研究[J].科研管理, 2009, 30(5): 187-195.
[34] Van Raan A F J.Sleeping beauties in science[J].Scientometrics, 2004, 59(3): 467-472.
[35] Gross P L K, Gross E M.College libraries and chemical education[J].Science, 1927, 66(1713): 385-389.
[36] Hirsch J E.An index to quantify an individual's scientific out-put[J].Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America,2005,102(46):16569-16572.
[37] Garfield E.Citation analysis as a tool in journal evaluation[J].Science, 1972, 471(4060): 471-479.
[38] Lippi G, Favaloro E J.Article downloads and citations: Is there any relationship?[J/OL].[2015-07-02].https://www.infona.pl/resource/bwmeta1.element.elsevier-25dc777f-620a-3c76-adab-1b2c154e0e86.
[39] Jahandideh S, Abdolmaleki P, Asadabadi E B.Prediction of future citations of a research paper from number of its Internet downloads[J].Medical Hypotheses,2007,69(2): 458-459.
[40] O'Leary D.The relationship between citations and number of downloads in Decision Support Systems[J].Decision Support Systems, 2008,45(4):972-980.
[41] 王贤文,毛文莉,王治.基于论文下载数据的科研新趋势实时探测与追踪[J].科学学与科技管理,2014,35(4):3-9.
[42] Wang Xianwen, Wang Zhi, Xu Shenmeng.Tracing scientist's research trends realtimely[J].Scientometrics, 2013, 95(2): 717-729.
[43] Wang Xianwen, Liu Chen, Mao Wenli, et al.The open access advantage considering citation, article usage and social media attention[J].Scientometrics, 2015, 103(2): 555-564.
[44] Wang Xianwen, Xu Shenmeng, Peng Lian, et al.Exploring scientists' working timetable: Do scientists often work overtime?[J].Journal of Informetrics,2012, 6(4): 655-660.
[45] Thewall M, Haustein S, Lariviere V, et al.Do altmetrics work? Twitter and ten other social Web services[J/OL].[2015-07-05].http://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0064841.
[46] Glanzel W, Gorraiz J.Usage metrics versus altmetrics:Confusing terminology?[J].Scientometrics, 2014,doi:10.1007/s11192-014-1472-7.
[47] Sud P, Thelwall M.Evaluating altmetrics[J].Scientometrics, 2014,98(2):1131-1143.
Options
文章导航

/

〈 〉