收稿日期: 2015-01-12
修回日期: 2015-03-02
网络出版日期: 2015-03-20
Summary of the Evolution of Citation Analysis Research: 2001-2014
Received date: 2015-01-12
Revised date: 2015-03-02
Online published: 2015-03-20
[目的/意义]为了解引文分析领域的发展状况,以领域知识载体之一——期刊文献为研究对象,通过知识单元特征描述和知识单元聚类层次结构,发现该领域知识发展的脉络和演进轨迹。[方法/过程]选择2001-2014年汤森路透Web of Science平台结构化的二次文献信息1 166条作为数据源,以信息计量学作为理论基础,利用统计分析、信息计量和分析复杂引文网络的社会网络分析方法,借鉴数据挖掘算法和处理工具技术,描述领域知识体系的特征。[结果/结论]从宏观与微观两个维度,以静态和动态两种方式,利用知识基础与研究前沿的时变对应,通过理论与实践的统一,准确地描述引文分析领域发展的宏观层次结构特征和微观节点属性、静态分布特征和动态演化规律、奠基性的基础理论和突破性的研究前沿。
万昊 , 谭宗颖 , 鲁晶晶 , 朱相丽 . 2001-2014年引文分析领域发展演化综述[J]. 图书情报工作, 2015 , 59(6) : 120 -136 . DOI: 10.13266/j.issn.0252-3116.2015.06.018
[Purpose/significance] In order to understand the development of the field of citation analysis, the paper picks periodical literature as domain knowledge carriers for the study and finds the development structure and evolution trajectory in the field of citation analysis through knowledge cell characteristics and knowledge unit hierarchical clusters.[Method/process] This paper chooses Thomson Reuters Web of Science platform as the data source to obtain 1166 structured secondary literature information. Theoretically based on the informetrics, methodologically relying on statistical analysis, informetrics and social network analysis methods and technologically drawing on the data mining algorithms for the sphere of citation analysis, we depict the knowledge structure of the field.[Result/conclusion] From the macro and micro dimensions, based on the correspondence between knowledge base and cutting-edge research frontier and the unification of theory and methodology, this paper accurately describes the macro structure characteristics and micro node attributes in the field of citation analysis to obtain the static distribution characteristics and dynamic evolution laws and find the basic theory and groundbreaking research frontier.
[1] 梁永霞,刘则渊,杨中楷. 引文分析学形成与发展的可视化分析[J]. 图书情报工作,2010,54(2):31-35.
[2] Ravetz J R. Scientific knowledge and its social problems[M]. Oxford:Clarendon Press, 1971:20-151.
[3] 邱均平. 信息计量学[M]. 武汉:武汉大学出版社, 2007: 97-427.
[4] 邱均平,宋艳辉. 引文分析领域研究热点前沿与高频作者的二维时空分析[J].图书情报知识,2011, 28(6): 18-24.
[5] Persson O. The intellectual base and research fronts of JASIS 1986-1990[J]. Journal of American Society for Information Science, 1994, 45(1):31-38.
[6] 梁永霞,杨中楷,刘则渊. 基于CSSCI的中国引文分析的可视化研究[J]. 图书情报工作,2009, 54(8):34-38.
[7] 邱均平. 网络计量学[M]. 北京: 科学出版社, 2010: 211-241.
[8] Pinski G, Narin F. Citation influence for journal aggregates of scientific publications-theory, with application to literature of physics[J]. Information Processing & Management, 1976, 12(5): 297-312.
[9] Garfield E. Citation indexes for science-A new dimension in documentation through association of ideas[J]. Science, 1955, 122(3159): 108-111.
[10] Garfield E. Citation analysis as a tool in journal evaluation-Journals can be ranked by frequency and impact of citations for science policy studies[J]. Science, 1972, 178(4060): 471-479.
[11] MacRoberts M H, MacRoberts B R. Problems of citation analysis: A critical review[J]. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 1989, 40(4): 342-349.
[12] Seglen P O. Why the impact factor of journals should not be used for evaluating research[J]. British Medical Journal, 1997, 314(7079): 498-502.
[13] Moed H F. Citation analysis of scientific journals and journal impact measures[J]. Current Science, 2005, 89(12): 1990-1996.
[14] Hirsch J E.An index to quantify an individual's scientific research output[J]. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2005, 102(46): 16569-16572.
[15] Egghe L, Rousseau R. An informetric model for the Hirsch-index[J]. Scientometrics, 2006, 69(1): 121-129.
[16] Cronin B, Meho L. Using the h-index to rank influential information scientists[J]. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 2006, 57(9): 1275-1278.
[17] Garfield E. The history and meaning of the journal impact factor[J]. Journal of the American Medical Association, 2006, 295(1): 90-93.
[18] Bornmann L, Mutz R, Daniel H D. Are there better indices for evaluation purposes than the h index?A comparison of nine different variants of the h index using data from biomedicine[J]. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 2008, 59(5): 830-837.
[19] Kuhn T S. Historical structure of scientific discovery[J]. Science, 1962, 136(3518): 760-764.
[20] Kessler M M. Bibliographic coupling between scientific papers[J]. American Documentation, 1963, 14(1): 10-25.
[21] Price D J. Little science,big science[C]. New York: Comlumbia University Press, 1963: 121-187.
[22] Price D J. Networks of scientific papers[J]. Science, 1965, 149(3683): 510-515.
[23] Merton R K. Matthew Effect in Science[J]. Science, 1968, 159(3810): 56-63.
[24] Small H. Co-citation in the scientific literature: A new measure of the relationship between two documents[J]. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 1973, 24(4): 265-269.
[25] Small H, Griffith B C. Structure of scientific literaturesⅠ: Identifying and graphing specialties[J]. Science Studies, 1974, 4(1): 17-40.
[26] Small H G. Cited documents as concept symbols[J]. Social Studies of Science, 1978, 8(3):327-340.
[27] White H D, Griffith B C. Author cocitation - a literature measure of intellectual structure[J]. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 1981, 32(3): 163-171.
[28] Mccain K W. Cocited author mapping as a valid representation of intellectual structure[J]. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 1986, 37(3): 111-122.
[29] White H D, McCain K W. Visualizing a discipline: An author co-citation analysis of information science, 1972-1995[J]. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 1998, 49(4): 327-355.
[30] Small H. Visualizing science by citation mapping[J]. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 1999, 50(9): 799-813.
[31] Freeman L C. Set of measures of centrality based on betweenness[J]. Sociometry, 1977, 40(1): 35-41.
[32] Hummon N P, Doreian P. Connectivity in a citation network: The development of DNA theory[J]. Social Networks, 1989, 11: 39-63.
[33] Watts D J, Strogatz S H. Collective dynamics of 'small-world' networks[J]. Nature, 1998, 393(6684): 440-442.
[34] Almind T C, Ingwersen P. Informetric analyses on the World Wide Web: Methodological approaches to 'webometrics'[J]. Journal Of Documentation, 1997, 53(4): 404-426.
[35] Ingwersen P. The calculation of web impact factors[J]. Journal of Documentation, 1998, 54(2): 236-243.
[36] Brin S, Page L. The anatomy of a large-scale hypertextual web search engine[J]. Computer Networks and ISDN Systems, 1998, 30(1-7): 107-117.
[37] Thelwall M. Extracting macroscopic information from web links[J]. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 2001, 52(13): 1157-1168.
[38] Cronin B. Bibliometrics and beyond: Some thoughts on web-based citation analysis[J]. Journal of Information Science, 2001, 27(1): 1-7.
[39] 邱均平. 网络计量学[M]. 北京: 科学出版社, 2010: 197-201.
[40] Thelwall M. Conceptualizing documentation on the web: An evaluation of different heuristic-based models for counting links between university web sites[J]. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 2002, 53(12): 995-1005.
[43] White H D, Mccain K W. Bibliometrics[J]. Annual Review of Information Science and Technology, 1989, 24: 119-186.
[44] Moed H F. Measuring contextual citation impact of scientific journals[J]. Journal of Informetrics, 2010, 4(3): 265-277.
[46] Franceschet M. Ten good reasons to use the Eigenfactor? metrics[J]. Information Processing & Management, 2010, 46(5): 555-558.
[47] Sud P, Thelwall M. Evaluating altmetrics[J]. Scientometrics, 2014, 98(2): 1131-1143.
[48] Gartner W B, Davidsson P, Zahra S A. Are you talking to me? The nature of community in entrepreneurship scholarship[J]. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 2006, 30(3): 321-331.
[49] Gregoire D A, Noel M X, Dery R, et al. Is there conceptual convergence in entrepreneurship research? A co-citation analysis of frontiers of entrepreneurship research, 1981–2004[J]. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 2006, 30(3): 333-373.
[50] Smith D R. A longitudinal analysis of bibliometric and impact factor trends among the core international journals of nursing, 1977–2008[J]. International Journal of Nursing Studies, 2010, 47(12): 1491-1499.
[51] Smith D R. Citation analysis and bibliometric research in the field of ergonomics[J]. Human Factors and Ergonomics in Manufacturing & Service Industries, 2010, 20(3): 202-210.
[52] Hoepnera A G F, Kantc B, Scholtens B, et al. Environmental and ecological economics in the 21st century: An age adjusted citation analysis of the influential articles, journals, authors and institutions[J]. Ecological Economics, 2012, 77: 193-206.
[53] Thelwall M. Journal impact evaluation: A webometric perspective[J]. Scientometrics, 2012, 92(2): 429-441.
[54] Franceschet M. A comparison of bibliometric indicators for computer science scholars and journals on Web of Science and Google Scholar[J]. Scientometrics, 2010, 83(1): 243-258.
/
| 〈 |
|
〉 |
