收稿日期: 2014-11-14
修回日期: 2014-12-21
网络出版日期: 2015-01-20
The Problems and Challenges of Research on Altmetrics
Received date: 2014-11-14
Revised date: 2014-12-21
Online published: 2015-01-20
[目的/意义]试图了解当前Altmetrics研究中的主要问题与亟待应对的挑战。[方法/过程]采用文献回顾的方法,对国内外Altmetrics研究进行系统的梳理和分析。[结果/结论]提出Altmetrics的理论研究需要面对定义模糊、研究方法和对象的独特性不足、理论基础缺乏、行为层面的理解较少等4个方面的问题,而应用研究需要面对指标覆盖率低、有偏、易为操纵和异质等4个方面的问题。作为科学计量学中最热门的新兴研究领域,当前Altmetrics研究中的诸多问题与挑战并不会贬损其价值,而是为我们提供了开展深入研究的空间。
关键词： Altmetrics; 科学计量学; 挑战
卫垌圻 , 谭宗颖 . Altmetrics国内外研究中的问题与挑战[J]. 图书情报工作, 2015 , 59(2) : 93 -99 . DOI: 10.13266/j.issn.0252-3116.2015.02.015
[Purpose/significance] The present paper aims to draw the outline of the problems and challenges of current research on Altmetrics.[Method/process] Using the literature reveiw method, we systematically organized and analyzed the research advances of Altmetrics.[Result/conclusion] We found that there are several practical challenges presented in the theoretical and applied research of Altmetrics. For the theoretical research, the challenges include the difficulty in defining Altmetrics, immature subjects and methods, the weak theoretical foundation et al; for the applied research, the challenge is that the Altmetrics indicators are often the low coverage, biased, heterogeneous and manipulated.These challenges should become the important research issue for future Altmetrics exploration.
Key words： altmetrics; scientometrics; challenges
[1] Sugimoto C R. Taking the measure of metrics: Interviews with four ASIS&T members [J]. Bulletin of the American Society for Information Science & Technology, 2012, 38(6): 33-38.
[2] Levitt J M, Thelwall M. From webometrics to altmetrics: One and a half decades of digital research at wolverhampton [EB/OL].[2014-08-11]. http://www.scit.wlv.ac.uk/~cm1993/papers/WebometricsAltmetricsWolverhamptonLIDA.pdf.
[3] Wouters P, Costas R. Users, narcissism and control: Tracking the impact of scholarly publications in the 21st century[EB/OL].[2014-12-21].http://sticonference.org/Proceedings/vol2/Wouters_Users_847.pdf.
[4] Piwowar H. Introduction altmetrics: What, why and where? [J]. Bulletin of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 2013, 39(4): 8-9.
[5] Priem J,Taraborelli D, Groth P, et al. Altmetrics: A manifesto[EB/OL].[2014-12-21].http://altmetrics.org/manifesto/.
[6] Konkiel S, Scherer D. New opportunities for repositories in the age of altmetrics [J]. Bulletin of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 2013, 39(4): 22-26.
[7] Piwowar H,Priem J. The power of altmetrics on a CV [J]. Bulletin of the Association for Information Science & Technology, 2013,39(4):10-13.
[8] 刘春丽. 基于 PLoS API 的论文影响力选择性计量指标研究 [J]. 图书情报工作, 2013, 57(7):89-95.
[9] 由庆斌, 汤珊红. 补充计量学及应用前景 [J]. 情报理论与实践, 2013, 36(12):6-10.
[10] 邱均平, 余厚强. 替代计量学的提出过程与研究进展 [J]. 图书情报工作, 2013,57(19): 5-12.
[11] Haustein S, Peters I, Bar-Ilan J, et al. Coverage and adoption of altmetrics sources in the bibliometric community [J]. Scientometrics, 2014(101): 1145-1163.
[12] Howard J. Scholars seek better ways to track impact online [EB/OL].[2014-12-21].http://chronicle.com/article/As-Scholarship-Goes-Digital/130482.
[13] Rousseau R, Ye F Y. A multi-metric approach for research evaluation [J]. Chinese Science Bulletin, 2013, 58(26):3288-3290.
[14] Thelwall M, Kousha K. Online presentations as a source of scientific impact? An analysis of powerpoint files citing academic journals [J]. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 2008, 59(5): 805-815.
[15] Kousha K, Thelwall M. Assessing the impact of disciplinary research on teaching: An automatic analysis of online syllabuses [J]. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 2008, 59(13): 2060-2069.
[16] Kousha K, Thelwall M. Google scholar citations and Google Web/URL citations: A multi-discipline exploratory analysis [J]. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 2007, 58(7): 1055-1065.
[17] Kousha K, Thelwall M. Google book search: Citation analysis for social science and the humanities [J]. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 2009, 60(8): 1537-1549.
[18] Mohammadi E, Thelwall M. Mendeley readership altmetrics for the social sciences and humanities: Research evaluation and knowledge flows [J]. Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology, 2014, 65(8):1627-1638.
[19] Sutherland W J, Goulson D, Potts S G. et al. Quantifying the impact and relevance of scientific research [J]. PLoS One, 2011, 6(11): e27537.
[20] Bar-Ilan J. Jasist@ Mendeley [EB/OL].[2014-12-19].http://altmetrics.org/altmetrics12/bar-ilan.
[21] Bar-Ilan J, Haustein S, Peters I, et al. Beyond citations: Scholars' visibility on the social Web [J]. arXiv preprint arXiv:1205.5611, 2012.
[22] Li Xuemei, Thelwall M, Giustini D. Validating online reference managers for scholarly impact measurement [J]. Scientometrics, 2012, 91(2): 461-471.
[23] Shuai Xin, Pepe A, Bollen J. How the scientific community reacts to newly submitted preprints: Article downloads, Twitter mentions, and citations [J]. PLoS One, 2012, 7(11):e47523.
[24] Eysenbach G. Can tweets predict citations? Metrics of social impact based on Twitter and correlation with traditional metrics of scientific impact [J]. Journal of Medical Internet Research, 2011, 13(4):e123.
[25] Haustein S, Peters I, Sugimoto C R, et al. Tweeting biomedicine: An analysis of tweets and citations in the biomedical literature [J]. Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology, 2014, 65(4):656-669.
[26] Thelwall M, Haustein S, Larivière V, et al. Do altmetrics work? Twitter and ten other social Web services [J]. PLoS One, 2013, 8(5):e64841.
[27] Priem J, Piwowar H A, Hemminger B M. Altmetrics in the wild: Using social media to explore scholarly impact [J]. arXiv preprint arXiv:1203.4745, 2012.
[28] Ju?ni? P, Vilar P, Bartol T. What do researchers think about altmetrics and are they familiar with their abilities? [C]//Libraries in the Digital Age (LIDA) Proceedings. Zadar:University of Zadar,2014.
[29] Rowlands I, Nicholas D, Russell B, et al. Social media use in the research workflow [J]. Learned Publishing, 2011, 24(3): 183-195.
[30] Priem J, Costello K L. How and why scholars cite on Twitter [J]. Proceedings of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 2010, 47(1): 1-4.
[31] Holmberg K, Thelwall M. Disciplinary differences in Twitter scholarly communication [J].Scientometrics,2014,101(2):11-16.
[32] Vilar P, Bartol T, Pisanski J, et al. Are librarians familiar with information seeking behaviour of teachers and researchers in their respective institutions? [C]//Libraries in the Digital Age (LIDA) Proceedings.Zadar:University of Zadar, 2012.
[33] Procter R, Williams R, Stewart J, et al. Adoption and use of Web 2.0 in scholarly communications [J]. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences, 2010, 368(1926): 4039-4056.
[34] Galligan F, Dyas-Correia S. Altmetrics: Rethinking the way we measure [J]. Serials Review, 2013, 39(1): 56-61.
[35] Hammarfelt B. Using altmetrics for assessing research impact in the humanities [J]. Scientometrics, 2014,101(2): 1-12.
[36] Liu Jean, Adie E. Five challenges in altmetrics: A toolmaker's perspective [J]. Bulletin of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 2013,39(4): 31-34.
/
| 〈 |
|
〉 |
