情报研究

科研合作视角下的学科知识流动分析方法研究——以药物化学学科为例

  • 徐晓艺 ,
  • 杨立英
展开
  • 1. 中国科学院文献情报中心;
    2. 中国科学院大学
徐晓艺,中国科学院文献情报中心、中国科学院大学硕士研究生,E-mail:xuxy@mail.las.ac.cn;杨立英,中国科学院文献情报中心副研究员。

收稿日期: 2014-05-29

  修回日期: 2014-08-15

  网络出版日期: 2014-10-05

Methodology Research of Disciplinary Knowledge Flows in Scientific Collaboration: A Case of “Pharmaceutical Chemistry” Discipline

  • Xu Xiaoyi ,
  • Yang Liying
Expand
  • 1. National Science Library, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100190;
    2. University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100049

Received date: 2014-05-29

  Revised date: 2014-08-15

  Online published: 2014-10-05

摘要

从科研合作角度出发,学科知识流动是指科研学者在共同的科研过程中,将相同或不同的学科知识融合、最终产生新知识的过程。基于这一理论,运用科学计量学的方法,设定恰当的计量指标,以药物化学学科为例,以独著论文中的学科知识流动表现为基础,对比分析科研合作视角下的学科知识在学科内与学科外的流动表现及其变化。最后对中国、美国、日本3个国家在此领域中表现出来的学科知识流动差异进行分析,展示各个国家药物化学领域的学科知识流向及其研究动态变化。

本文引用格式

徐晓艺 , 杨立英 . 科研合作视角下的学科知识流动分析方法研究——以药物化学学科为例[J]. 图书情报工作, 2014 , 58(19) : 83 -91 . DOI: 10.13266/j.issn.0252-3116.2014.19.013

Abstract

In scientific collaboration, disciplinary knowledge flows are in the course of scientific research process, in which research scholars integrate the same or different disciplines knowledge, and ultimately generate new knowledge. Based upon this theory, from the perspective of scientific collaboration, this paper analyses the performance of the disciplines knowledge flows of the co-author papers according to the performance of the single-author papers in the"pharmaceutical chemistry" discipline with bibliometric indicators. And then it compares the different performances of three countries including China, America and Japan, concluding the different disciplines knowledge flowing direction and its dynamic changes.

参考文献

[1] 谢守美.知识生态系统知识流动的生态学分析[J].图书馆学研究,2009(5):7-10.

[2] 张树良.研究领域的多学科属性度量及多学科结构揭示[D].北京:中国科学院研究生院,中国科学院文献情报中心,2008.

[3] 庞杰.知识流动理论框架下的科学前沿与技术前沿研究——以太阳能电池领域的计量研究为例[D].大连:大连理工大学,2011.

[4] Rousseau R. Robert fairthorne and the empirical powerlaws [J]. Journal of Documentation, 2005, 61(2): 194-205.

[5] Liu Yuxian, Rousseau R. Knowledge diffusion through publications and citations: A case study using ESI-fields as unit of diffusion[J].Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 2010, 61(2): 340-351.

[6] Rowlands I. Journal diffusion factor: A new approach to measuring research influence [J]. Aslib Proceedings, 2002, 54(2):77-84.

[7] Frandsen T F. Journal diffusion factors: A measure of diffusion? [J]. Aslib Proceedings, 2004, 56(1): 5-11.

[8] Egghe L. Journal diffusion factors and their mathematical relations with the number of citations and with the impact factor[C]//Ingwersen P, Larsen B. Proceedings of ISSI 2005.Stockholm:Karolinska University Press, 2005: 109-120.

[9] Porter A L, Cohen A S, Roessner J D, et al.Measuring researcher interdisciplinarity[J].Scientometrics, 2007,72(1):117-147.

[10] Porter A L, Chubin D E. An indicator of cross-disciplinary research [J]. Scientometrics, 1985, 8(3/4): 161-176.

[11] Brillouin L. Science and information theory[M]. New York:Academic Press, 1956: 125.

[12] 林莉. 科研论文合著网络结构与合作关系研究[D]. 长春:吉林大学, 2010.

[13] 赵星.谭旻.余小萍.等.我国文科领域知识扩散之引文网络探析[J].中国图书馆学报,2012(9):59-67.

[14] Rafols I, Meyer M.Diversity and network coherence as indicators of interdisciplinarity: Case studies in bionanoscience[J].Scientometrics,2010,82(2):263-287.

[15] 杨良斌.周秋菊.金碧辉.基于文献计量的跨学科测度及实证研究[J].图书情报工作,2009,53(5):87-90.

文章导航

/