图书情报工作

图书情报工作 >

2014 , Vol. 58 >Issue 17: 52 - 60

DOI: https://doi.org/10.13266/j.issn.0252-3116.2014.17.008

理论研究

基于WCAG 2.0的国家图书馆可访问性评价研究

展开
  • 北京师范大学政府管理学院
黄崑，北京师范大学政府管理学院副教授，博士，硕士生导师，E-mail：huangkun@bnu.edu.cn；宋灵超，北京师范大学政府管理学院硕士研究生；张路路，北京师范大学政府管理学院硕士研究生；陈巧玲，北京师范大学政府管理学院本科生。

收稿日期: 2014-05-04

  修回日期: 2014-07-17

  网络出版日期: 2014-09-05

基金资助

本文系国家科技支撑计划项目“文化资源服务平台解决方案及标准研究”的子课题“文化资源数字化建设规范与标准研究”（项目编号：2012BAH01F01-03）研究成果之一。

收起

Research on the Accessibility Evaluation of National Library Websites Based on WCAG 2.0

Expand
  • School of Government, Beijing Normal University, Beijing 100875

Received date: 2014-05-04

  Revised date: 2014-07-17

  Online published: 2014-09-05

Fold

摘要

在回顾与评价图书馆网站可访问性评价研究的基础上，选取6个国家图书馆网站，利用Achecker工具，根据WCAG 2.0 Level A标准对网站首页和二级页面进行可访问性评价。结果发现：6个国家图书馆的708个测评网页的总体通过率为43.6%，其中：法国国家图书馆网页通过率最好；我国与俄罗斯国家图书馆在可访问性达标方面与其他国家存在一定差距；6个国家图书馆在网页可访问性达标方面存在共性错误。在此基础上，从制度完善、图书馆网站开发与管理、网页设计规范等方面就我国图书馆网站可访问性水平提升问题提出对策和建议。

关键词： 可访问性评价; 国家图书馆; 公共图书馆; 网站评价; WCAG

本文引用格式

黄崑, 宋灵超, 张路路, 陈巧玲 . 基于WCAG 2.0的国家图书馆可访问性评价研究[J]. 图书情报工作, 2014 , 58(17) : 52 -60 . DOI: 10.13266/j.issn.0252-3116.2014.17.008

Abstract

Based on the review of research on the library Websites' accessibility, it evaluates six national library Websites according to the WCAG 2.0 Level A with the use of Achecker. After analyzing the home pages and the secondary pages of 6 national library Websites, it finds that 43.6% of the Web pages pass the evaluation. Moreover, French National Library Website reaches the best pass rate. However, national library Websites of Russia and China need more improvements. Nevertheless, some common mistakes occur among 6 countries. Finally, it provides some suggestions including the promotion of rules, development and management of library Websites, design of Web page to improve the accessibility of libraries in our country.

Key words： accessibility evaluation; national library; public library; Website evaluation; WCAG

参考文献

[1] 詹福瑞. 谈国家图书馆的服务创新[J]. 国家图书馆学刊,2007(1):2-5.

[2] ISO.Information and Documentation-International Library Statistics[S/OL].[2014-03-20].http://www.iso.org/iso/home/store/catalogue_ics/catalogue_detail_ics.htm?csnumber=28236.

[3] 李广建,王巍巍,杨林,等.基于WCAG 2.0政府网站可访问性评价研究[J]. 中国图书馆学报,2011(6):27-36.

[4] 中共中央办公厅,国务院办公厅.国家"十一五"时期文化发展规划纲要[J]. 时政文献辑览,2007:850-876.

[5] 中共中央办公厅,国务院办公厅.国家"十二五"时期文化改革发展规划纲要[J]. 新疆新闻出版,2012(2):17-25.

[6] 第十一届全国人民代表大会常务委员会.中华人民共和国残疾人保障法[EB/OL].[2014-03-20].http://www.gov.cn/jrzg/2008-04/24/content_953439.htm.

[7] Hill H. Disability and accessibility in the library and information science literature: A content analysis[J]. Library & Information Science Research, 2013, 35(2): 137-142.

[8] Lazar J, Wentz B, Almalhem A, et al. A longitudinal study of state government homepage accessibility in Maryland and the role of Web page templates for improving accessibility[J]. Government Information Quarterly, 2013, 30(3): 289-299.

[9] 郭金兰.中国政府网站可访问性现状[J].情报科学,2009(12):1802-1805.

[10] Klein D, Myhill W, Hansen L, et al. Electronic doors to education: Study of high school Website accessibility in Iowa[J]. Behavioral Sciences & the Law, 2003, 21(1): 27-49.

[11] Kurt S. The accessibility of university Web sites: The case of Turkish universities[J]. Universal Access in the Information Society, 2011, 10(1): 101-110.

[12] Ringlaben R, Bray M, Packard A. Accessibility of American University Special Education Departments' Web sites[J]. Universal Access in the Information Society, 2014, 13(2): 249-254.

[13] Spindler T. The accessibility of Web pages for mid-sized college and university libraries[J]. Reference & User Services Quarterly, 2002,42(2): 149-154.

[14] Fulton C. Web accessibility, libraries, and the law[J]. Information Technology and Libraries, 2011, 30(1): 34-43.

[15] 李院.图书馆网站的可访问性探讨[J].情报杂志,2000(2):37-38.

[16] 王英杰,吴晓海.医院图书馆网站建设的思考[J].中华医学图书情报杂志,2011(3):75-77.

[17] Schmetzke A. Leadership at the American Library Association and accessibility: A critical view[J]. Library Hi Tech, 2007, 25(4): 528-537.

[18] Comeaux D, Schmetzke A. Accessibility of academic library Web sites in North America: Current status and trends (2002-2012)[J]. Library Hi Tech, 2013, 31(1): 8-33.

[19] Web Content Accessibility Guidelines(WCAG) 1.0[EB/OL].[2014-02-19]. http://www.w3.org/TR/1999/WAI-WEBCONTENT-19990505/,05-05-1999.

[20] Forgrave S, McKechnie L. Online on ramps: A pilot study evaluation of the accessibility of Canadian public library Web sites to visually and hearing challenged users[C/OL]//Proceedings of the 29th Annual Conference of the Canadian Association for Information Science, 2001.[2014-03-20].http://fims-grc.fims.uwo.ca/wp-content/uploads/2013/06/LIS697_Forgrave.pdf.

[21] Brobst J. Evaluating the accessibility of Florida's public library home pages[J]. Libri, 2009, 59(2): 88-103.

[22] USA federal government.Section508[EB/OL].[2014-03-20].http://www.section508.gov/index.cfm?fuseAction=stdsdoc.

[23] 曹锦丹,程文英,李岩.公共图书馆健康信息服务的Web可访问性评价[J].图书馆学研究,2012(22):73-77.

[24] W3C.Web content accessibility guidelines(WCAG)2.0[EB/OL].[2014-03-20].http://www.w3.org/TR/WCAG/.

[25] Conway V, Brown J, Hollier S, et al. Website accessibility: A comparative analysis of Australian national and state/territory library Websites[J]. The Australian Library Journal, 2012, 61(3): 170-188.

[26] Schmetzke A. Web accessibility at university libraries and library schools[J]. Library Hi Tech, 2001, 19(1): 35-49.

[27] Potter A. Accessibility of Alabama government Web sites[J]. Journal of Government Information, 2002, 29(5): 303-317.

[28] Fagan J C, Fagan B. An accessibility study of state legislative Web sites[J]. Government Information Quarterly, 2004, 21(1): 65-85.

[29] Jaeger P T. Assessing Section 508 compliance on federal e-government Web sites: A multi-method, user-centered evaluation of accessibility for persons with disabilities[J]. Government Information Quarterly, 2006, 23(2): 169-190.

[30] Olalere A, Lazar J. Accessibility of US federal government home pages: Section 508 compliance and site accessibility statements[J]. Government Information Quarterly, 2011, 28(3): 303-309.

[31] Hackett S, Parmanto B. Homepage not enough when evaluating Web site accessibility[J]. Internet Research, 2009, 19(1): 78-87.

[32] Tanaka E, Sugaya M. Universal service to universal access and Web accessibility-government vs. governance[J]. Keio Communication Review, 2005, 27(3): 65-88.

[33] Australian Government Information Management Office (AGIMO).Web accessibility national transition strategy[EB/OL].[2014-03-20].http://www.finance.gov.au/publications/wcag-2-implementation/docs/wcag-transition-strategy.pdf.

[34] 中华人民共和国工业和信息化部.YD/T 1761-20012,网站设计无障碍技术要求[EB/OL].[2014-03-20].http://www.zgmx.org.cn/before/NewsDefault-50730.html.

[35] 中华人民共和国工业和信息化部.YD/T 1822-2008, 信息无障碍.身体机能差异人群 网站设计无障碍评级测试方法[EB/OL].[2014-03-20].http://www.pv265.com/hangye/yd/39296.html.

[36] 黄超美,孔庆杰,赵闯.我国图书馆网站建设研究综述[J].情报科学,2006(12):1909-1913.

[37] W3C.Complete list of Web accessibility evaluation tools[EB/OL].[2014-03-20]. http://www.w3.org/WAI/ER/tools/complete.

[38] Hackett S, Parmanto B. A longitudinal evaluation of accessibility: Higher education Web sites[J]. Internet Research, 2005, 15(3): 281-294.

[39] W3C.F2: Failure of success criterion 1.3.1 due to using changes in text presentation to convey information without using the appropriate markup or text[EB/OL].[2014-03-20]. http://www.w3.org/TR/2014/NOTE-WCAG20-TECHS-20140311/F2.

[40] W3C.C22: Using CSS to control visual presentation of text [EB/OL].[2014-03-20]. http://www.w3.org/TR/UNDERSTANDING-WCAG20/content-structure-separation-programmatic.html.

[41] W3C.Understanding SC 2.1.1[EB/OL].[2014-03-20].http://www.w3.org/TR/UNDERSTANDING-WCAG20/keyboard-operation-keyboard-operable.html.

Options
文章导航

/

〈 〉