收稿日期: 2014-04-01
修回日期: 2014-04-05
网络出版日期: 2014-04-20
基金资助
本文系西南大学中央高校基本科研业务费专项资金“侵入创新理论与高校图书馆岗位轮换长效机制研究”（项目编号SWU1209388）和2013年度教育部人文社会科学研究西部和边疆地区项目“高校人文社会科学研究者信息需求规律及服务模式研究”（项目编号：13XJC870001）研究成果之一。
An Empirical Study on the Performance Evaluation of Information Resources in Databases Based on Entropy-Weight TOPSIS
Received date: 2014-04-01
Revised date: 2014-04-05
Online published: 2014-04-20
周艳 , 蒲筱哥 . 熵权TOPSIS模型在数据库绩效评价中的应用研究[J]. 图书情报工作, 2014 , 58(08) : 36 -41 . DOI: 10.13266/j.issn.0252-3116.2014.08.006
Based on the five criteria indicators, including the database information resources, database retrieval system function, database resource utilization, database resource cost evaluation and the service level of data provider, this paper constructs the 23 index layer indicators which reflect the performance of the database information resource service; values to each index from the subjective and objective aspects with the entropy weight method, then calculates each index weight; And TOPSIS model was applied to analyze the service performance of the sample database information resource. The results of the study reveal the difference of the sample database performance and the main factors that affect the database performance.
Key words： databases; performance evaluation; entropy-weight; TOPSIS Model
[1] 蒲筱哥,胡亚敏. 图书馆电子资源绩效多指标综合评价方法评析[J].图书情报工作,2013,57(7):138-143.
[2] 邱东.多指标综合评价方法的系统分析[M]. 北京:中国统计出版社,1991.
[3] 邱苑华.管理决策熵学及其应用[M].北京:中国电力出版社,2010.
[4] 张李义.高校图书馆商业数据库评价指标体系研究[J].中国图书馆学报,2004,30(1):66-69.
[5] ISO 2789:2006.Information and documentation--International library statistics[S/OL].[2013-12-15].http://www.iso.org/iso/iso_catalogue/catalogue_tc/catalogue_detail.htm?csnumber=39181.
[6] EQUINOX: Library performance measurement and quality management system performance indicators for electronic library services[EB/OL].[2013-12-15]. http://www. equinox. dcu. ie/reports/pilist.html.
[7] Julia C B. Measures for electronic use: The ARL E-Metric project[EB/OL].[2013-12-21]. http://www.arl.org/stats/newmeas/em-etrics/ Blixrud_IFLA.pdf.
[8] 肖珑,张宇红. 电子资源评价指标体系的建立初探[J].大学图书馆学报,2002(3):35-40.
[9] 肖希明. 网络环境下的馆藏评价标准[J].中国图书馆学报,2002,28(5) :21-24.
[10] 盛小平.数字图书馆馆藏评价[J].图书情报工作, 2003, 47(5): 40-43.
[11] 徐革.我国大学图书馆电子资源绩效评价方法及其应用研究[D].成都:西南交通大学,2006.
[12] Shannon C E. A mathematical theory of communication[J]. Bell System Technology,1948,27(2):379-423.
[13] Hwang C L,Yoon K.Multiple attributes decision making methods and applications[M].New York:Springer, 1981.
[14] TOPSIS法[EB/OL]. [2014-02-21]. http://baike.baidu.com/link?url=ubmCA-FCr7hyzow bgrZqztsYbN_cfaJSB3-SNMvIneFoeGb0Edy8lyNIlGs00XR_7tusyGTMhoUn4NyRXWH8L_.
/
| 〈 |
|
〉 |
