图书情报工作

图书情报工作 >

2014 , Vol. 58 >Issue 03: 95 - 98,123

DOI: https://doi.org/10.13266/j.issn.0252-3116.2014.03.015

情报研究

电子期刊订购的多维度聚类决策分析与评价实证研究

  • 韩鹏鸣
展开
  • 天津大学图书馆
韩鹏鸣，天津大学图书馆馆员，硕士，E-mail：hanpm@tju.edu.cn。

收稿日期: 2013-12-11

  修回日期: 2011-01-19

  网络出版日期: 2014-02-05

收起

An Empirical Study on Decision Analysis and Evaluation of Electronic Periodicals Subscription Based on Multi-dimensional Clustering

  • Han Pengming
Expand
  • Tianjin University Library, Tianjin 300072

Received date: 2013-12-11

  Revised date: 2011-01-19

  Online published: 2014-02-05

Fold

摘要

以天津大学订购的ScienceDirect数据库为例，以成本作为基准变量，以5年影响因子、即时指数、特征因子、论文影响值、SJR、SNIP和H指数作为参考变量，对代表性电子期刊进行层次聚类分析。研究结果表明，各类期刊在质量和使用成本方面都具有显著特征，据此确定期刊订购原则，可使图书馆的电子期刊订购更加科学合理。

关键词： 期刊评价; 层次聚类; 引文指标; 成本效益

本文引用格式

韩鹏鸣 . 电子期刊订购的多维度聚类决策分析与评价实证研究[J]. 图书情报工作, 2014 , 58(03) : 95 -98,123 . DOI: 10.13266/j.issn.0252-3116.2014.03.015

Abstract

Taking Tianjin University as an example, this paper makes the hierarchical clustering analysis of representative electronic periodicals in ScienceDirect, including reference indicator based on cost and bibliometric indicators based on 5-year Impact Factor, Immediacy Index, Eigen factor, Article Influence Score, SCImago Journal Rank, Source Normalized Impact per Paper and H index. The result shows that the quality and cost of various periodicals have remarkable characteristics, thus making subscription principles can make the more scientific and reasonable basis for libraries on periodicals subscription.

Key words： periodicals evaluation; hierarchical clustering; citation index; cost benefit

参考文献

[1] Yue Weiping, Wilson C S.Measuring the citation impact of research journals in clinical neurology:A structural equation modeling analysis[J].Scientometrics, 2004, 60(3):317-334.
[2] Borokhovich K A, Lee A A, Simkins B J. A framework for journal assessment: The case of the Journal of Banking & Finance[J].Journal of Banking & Finance, 2011, 35(1):1-6.
[3] 苏新宁.构建人文社会科学学术期刊评价体系[J].东岳论丛, 2008, 29(1):35-42.
[4] 刘颖.基于衍生h指数期刊评价指标构建与实证研究[J].图书情报工作, 2011, 55(14):144-148.
[5] 许海云, 方曙.基于引文分布和引文网络的学术期刊评价指标研究[J].情报科学, 2013(2):130-134, 139.
[6] 俞立平, 潘云涛, 武夷山.基于结果一致度的学术期刊组合评价研究[J].中国科技期刊研究, 2011(1):59-64.
[7] Saunders E S.Cost efficiency in ARL academic libraries[J].Bottom Line: Managing Library Finances, 2003, 16(1):5-14.
[8] Jeng J.Usability of the digital library:An evaluation model[J].College & Research Libraries News, 2006, 67(2):76-79.
[9] 王祖国.全文电子期刊数据库评估指标体系研究[D].上海:上海交通大学, 2007.
[10] 张建.高校电子期刊数据库评价体系研究[D].大连:大连理工大学, 2009.
[11] 和媛媛, 巩在武.基于模糊多属性决策的高校图书馆电子资源服务绩效评价研究[J].情报科学, 2011(3):412-415, 420.
[12] 刘军, 莫利江, 吴朗, 等.电子资源综合评价指标体系的构建探讨[J].情报杂志, 2010(S1):135-137.
[13] 张玉峰, 何超.基于领域本体的竞争情报聚类分析研究[J].情报科学, 2011(11):1613-1615, 1630.
[14] 王娟, 郑春厚.JCR 5年期影响因子实证分析[J].图书情报工作, 2012, 56(4):143-147.
[15] Bergstrom C.Eigenfactor:Measuring the value and prestige of scholarly journals[J].College & Research Libraries News, 2007, 68(5):314-316.
[16] About SJR[EB/OL].[2013-11-14].http://www.journalmetrics.com/sjr.php.
[17] 许翠花.基于概念视角的h指数评价效果研究[J].情报科学, 2013(5):72-76.
[18] EigenfactorTM score and article influenceTM score: Detailed methods[EB/OL].[2013-11-14]. http://www.eigenfactor.org/methods.pdf.
[19] Methodology[EB/OL].[2013-11-14].http://www.journalindicators.com/methodology.
[20] [2013-11-13].http://www.webofknowledge.com.
[21] [2013-11-13].http://www.scopus.com.
Options
文章导航

/

〈 〉