收稿日期: 2013-04-01
修回日期: 2013-04-21
网络出版日期: 2013-05-05
基金资助
本文系国家自然科学基金青年项目"多语言环境下Social Tagging的内涵机理与应用框架研究——基于比较视角"(项目编号:71103203)研究成果之一。
Study on the Integrated Mode for Classifying and Organizing Micro-content
Received date: 2013-04-01
Revised date: 2013-04-21
Online published: 2013-05-05
分析social tagging与传统分类组织方式各自的比较优势,根据微内容内涵和组织特点,尝试构建微内容三阶段复合式分类组织模式。这三阶段分别是聚合阶段、机制设计阶段和成型阶段。聚合阶段按照信息类型对微内容进行聚合。机制设计阶段含分类机制和组织机制,分类机制从类别、词义、词型、词性角度融合tags与分面分类法,组织机制从匹配程度、层次关系和标引深度三个方面比较tags与传统主题词。成型阶段采用规范、吸纳、推荐三种方式优化tags,使其能够更好地管理微内容。
关键词： 微内容; social tagging; tag; 分类组织
徐晨 . 面向微内容分类组织的复合模式研究[J]. 图书情报工作, 2013 , 57(09) : 113 -118 . DOI: 10.7536/j.issn.0252-3116.2013.09.019
This paper analyzes the comparative advantages between social tagging and traditional classification organization. Then it tries to develop a three-phase integrated mode to classify and organize micro-content based on its connotation and organizational characteristics, which are aggregation, mechanism design and formation phase. Micro-content is aggregated in the aggregation phase according to information types. Mechanism design includes classified mechanism which integrates tags and faced classification from the perspective of category, meaning, appearance and part of the speech, and organization mechanism which compares tags and traditional subject terms from the perspective of matching degree, hierarchical relation and indexing depth. The formation phase optimizes tags with standardization, enrollment and recommendation to manage micro-content.
Key words： micro-content; social tagging; tag; classification and organization
[1] Nielsen J. Microcontent: How to write headlines,page titles, and subject lines[EB/OL].[2013-03-10]. http://www.useit.com/alertbox/980906.html.
[2] Cmswiki. MicroContent[EB/OL].[2013-03-10]. http://www.cmswiki.com/tiki- index.php?page=MicroContent.
[3] 范艳君. 微内容及其在图书馆服务中的新应用[J].图书馆学研究,2009(11):67-69.
[4] 邓顺国,宗乾进,杨黎星. 微内容:网络信息服务模式的变革[J].图书馆理论与实践,2009(10):36-38.
[5] 王国才. 基于本体的微内容聚合与查询技术[D].合肥:合肥工业大学,2009:28-34.
[6] 张乾,蔡淑琴,石双元. 微内容序化方法与应用实例[J]. 图书情报工作,2012,56(4):38-41.
[7] 张琪玉.网络信息检索用语言的发展趋势[J].图书馆杂志,2001(3):5-7,22.
[8] Shirky C. Ontology is overrated: Categories, links, and tags[EB/OL].[2013-03-10].http://www.shirky.com/writings/ontology_overrated.html.
[9] Uddin M N, Mezbah-ul-Islam M, Haque K M G. Information description and discovery method using classification structure in Web[J].Malaysian Journal of Library & Information Science, 2006,11(2): 1-20.
[10] Schwartz C. Thesauri and Facets and tags, oh my! A look at three decades in subject analysis[J].Library Trends,2008,56(4):830-842.
[11] Peterson E. Beneath the metadata: Some philosophical problems with folksonomy[J/OL].D-Lib Magazine, 2006,12(11).[2013-03-10]. http://www.dlib.org/dlib/november06/peterson/11peterson.html.
[12] Guy M, Tokin E. Folksonomies tidying up tags[J/OL].D-Lib Magazine,2006,12(1).[2013-03-10].http://www.dlib.org/dlib/january06/guy/01guy.html.
[13] Noruzi A. Folksonomies: (Un) Controlled vocabulary?[EB/OL].[2013-03-10].http://eprints.rclis.org/archive/00011286/01/Folksonomy,_UnControled_Vocabulary.pdf.
[14] Speller E. Collaborative tagging, folksonomies, distributed classification or ethnoclassification:A literature review[J/OL]. Library Student Journal,2007,11(2).[2013-03-10]. http://www.librarystudentjournal.org/index.php/lsj/article/view/45/58.
[15] Tennis J T. Social tagging and the next steps for indexing[EB/OL].[2013-03-10].http://journals.lib.washington.edu/index.php/acro/article/view/12493.
[16] Yi K. A semantic similarity approach to predicting Library of Congress Subject Headings for social tags[J]. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 2010, 61(8):1658-1672.
[17] Yi K, Chan L M. Linking folksonomy to Library of Congress subject headings:An exploratory study[J]. Journal of Documentation, 2009, 65(6): 872-900.
[18] Menard E. Ordinary image retrieval in a multilingual context: A comparison of two indexing vocabularies[J]. Aslib Proceedings,2010,62(4/5): 428-437.
[19] 乐庆玲.基于协同机制的Tag资源自动分类研究[J]. 现代图书情报技术,2007(9):57-61.
[20] 羌丽,张学莲,侯汉清.图书大众标注评介[J].图书馆杂志,2009(2): 21-26.
[21] 王翠英.Folksonomy与主题标引[J].情报理论与实践,2007(5):693-697.
[22] 王翠英. 本体与Folksonomy的比较研究[J].图书馆建设,2008(5):85-88.
[23] 范炜.Drupal分类组织机制研究:一种复合信息组织模式[J].图书馆杂志,2010(1):23-26.
[24] 陈伟. 用户参与的社会性标签信息组织探讨[J].图书馆学研究,2012(6):79-82.
[25] 滕广青,毕强,高娅. 基于概念格的Folksonomy知识组织研究[J].现代图书情报技术,2012(6):22-27.
[26] 刘军. 微内容分层聚合及在数字参考咨询中的应用[J]. 图书情报工作,2011,55(12):106-109.
[27] Angus E, Thelwall M, Stuart D. General patterns of tag usage among university groups in Flickr[J].Online Information Review, 2008, 32(1):89-101.
[28] Golder S A, Huberman B A. Usage patterns of collaborative tagging systems[J].Journal of Information Science,2006, 32(2):198-208.
[29] Munk T B, Mork K. Folksonomies, tagging communities, and tagging strategies-An empirical study[J]. Knowledge Organization, 2007, 34(3): 115-127.
[30] Kipp M E I. @toread and Cool: Tagging for time, task and emotion[EB/OL].[2013-03-10].http://www.vraweb.org/conferences/sandiego2008/sessions/session1/Margaret_Kipp.pdf.
[31] Muller M J, Ehrlich K, Farrell S. Social tagging and self-tagging for impression management[EB/OL].[2013-03-10].http://domino.watson.ibm.com/cambridge/research.nsf/c9ef590d6d00291a85257141004a5c19/27658d7dcf7e8cce852572330070244d/$FILE/TR2006-2.pdf.[ZK)]
[32] 施国良.国内外分面分类法基本理论研究述评[J].图书馆学研究,2008(12):2-5.
[33] Wetterstrom M. The complementarity of tags and LCSH-A tagging experiment and investigation into added value in a New Zealand library context[J]. New Zealand Library & Information Management Journal, 2008, 50(4):296-310.
/
| 〈 |
|
〉 |
