知识团队知识分享困境的博弈机理研究——对两种均衡策略的比较

陈东灵

PDF(361 KB)

图书情报工作 ›› 2011, Vol. 55 ›› Issue (24) : 97-101.

知识组织

知识团队知识分享困境的博弈机理研究——对两种均衡策略的比较

陈东灵

作者信息 +

Game Mechanisms of Knowledge Sharing Dilemma in Knowledge Team——Comparing with Two Equilibrium Strategies

Chen Dongling

Author information +

文章历史 +

摘要

运用博弈论，对知识团队知识分享困境的博弈机理进行分析。研究发现：帕累托均衡的分享知识量大于纳什均衡的分享知识量；当成员收益不同时，知识分享变成智猪博弈。最后从团队整体利益出发，给出克服知识分享障碍的相关建议。

Abstract

Using game theory and analyzing game mechanisms of knowledge sharing dilemma in knowledge team, it could find that: sharing knowledge amount of Pareto Equilibrium is greater than that of Nash Equilibrium; when members’ earnings are different, knowledge sharing would change into boxed pigs game. Finally, based on the whole interest of team, it gives related recommendations to overcome knowledge sharing barriers.

导出引用

陈东灵. 知识团队知识分享困境的博弈机理研究——对两种均衡策略的比较[J]. 图书情报工作, 2011, 55(24): 97-101

Chen Dongling. Game Mechanisms of Knowledge Sharing Dilemma in Knowledge Team——Comparing with Two Equilibrium Strategies[J]. Library and Information Service, 2011, 55(24): 97-101

参考文献

[1] 王鲁捷,陈龙.有效培育动态知识团队[J].中国人力资源开发,2003,17(11):56-59. [2] I. Nonaka, N. Konno. The Concept of“Ba”: Building a Foundation for Knowledge Creation [J] , California Management Review, 1998,40(3):40-54. [3] Chih-Chien Wang. The influence of ethical and self-interest concerns on knowledge sharing intentions among managers: An empirical study[J]. International Journal of Management, 2004,21(3): 370-381. [4] Ray Reagans, Bill McEvily. Network structure and knowledge transfer: The effects of cohesion and range[J]. Administrative Science Quarterly, 2003,48: 240-267. [5] Philip M. Podsakoff, Scott B. Mackenzie, Julie Beth Paine, Daniel G. Bachrach. Organizational Citizenship Behaviors: A Critical Review of the Theoretical and Empirical Literature and Suggestions for Future Research[J]. Journal of Management, 2000, 26(3): 513-563. [6] 钟耕深,赵前.团队组织中知识共享的风险、障碍与对策[J].山东社会科学,2005(7):116-119. [7] F. A. Hayek, 1948a. Individualism and Economic Order. Chicago : University of Chicago Press. [8] Reid FJM, Malinek V, Scott CJT and Evans JBR. The messaging threshold in computer-mediated communication[J]. Ergonomics, 1996,(39):1017-1037. [9] 张玲玲,郑秀榆,马俊,聂广礼,石勇.团队知识转移与共享“搭便车”行为的激励机制研究[J].科学学研究,2009,27(10):1543-1550. [10] 王丽丽,刘静冉.高校科研团队内部知识共享的障碍与攻略[J].前沿,2007(12):122-124. [11] 柯江林,石金涛.组织中员工知识分享行为激励机制的比较分析[J].上海交通大学学报,2006,40(9):1566-1571. [12] Zarraga C, Bonache J. Assessing the team environment for knowledge sharing: An empirical analysis[J]. International Journal of Human Resource Management, 2003, 14(7): 1227-1245. [13] 张维迎.博弈论与信息经济学[M].上海:上海三联书店,上海人民出版社,2004:50-53. [14] 曹雁,吴英策.国外团队成员协作与知识分享行为研究新进展[J].贵州大学学报（社会科学版）,2010,28(2):25-28. [15] 庄玉梅,张体勤.个体知识分享行为的理论透视[J].图书情报工作,2009,53(20):118-121. [16] Hollingshead A. B. Communication, Learning, and Retrieval in the Transactive Memory System[J].Experiment Social Psychology, 1998,(34): 423-442. [17] 王端旭,薛会娟.交互记忆系统与团队创造力关系的实证研究[J].科研管理,2011,32(1):122-128. [18] Minu Ipe. Knowledge Sharing in Organizations: A Conceptual Framework[J]. Human Resource Development Review, 2003,2(4): 337-359. [19] Wesley M. Cohen, Daniel A. Levinthal. Absorptive Capacity: A New Perspective on Learning and Innovation[J]. Administrative Science Quarterly, 1990,35: 128-152. [20] 薛会娟.知识分享的困境及突围策略研究[J].情报杂志,2010,29(3):103-106. [21]孙爱军.虚拟R&D团队成员间知识共享障碍与利益协调方案[J].情报科学.2009,27(8):1157-1160. [22] 杨瑞明,叶金福,邹艳.团队社会网络对团队知识共享作用机制的实证研究[J].情报理论与实践,2010,33(2):68-72.