
阮元校勘《礼记正义》存在的问题
Imperfection of Liji Zhengyi Collated by Ruan Yuan
阮元校《十三经注疏》,于《礼记正义》大量采用南宋卫湜《礼记集说》的材料,由于版本的判定和使用犯了重要错误,使得大量校勘记条目与卫湜《礼记集说》原文事实不符,所采材料不可靠。通过对卫湜《礼记集说》版本源流的清理,比勘宋郡斋本、明影钞宋本、清通志堂经解本、《四库全书》本各版本,发现阮元所用《礼记集说》的版本非宋本,而是经过重大改动的通志堂经解本。
As one part of Notes and Commentaries on the Thirteen Classics, Liji Zhengyi Collated by Ruan Yuan has extensively used the material from Liji Jishuo by Wei Shi. But Ruan Yuan used the wrong edition of Liji Jishuo, which had resulted in that many entries of the log of collation are inconsistent with the original text of Liji Jishuo by Wei Shi. Via inquiring into the source and course of Liji Jishuo by Wei Shi, analyzing and comparing Jun Zhai version in Song Dynasty, the transcription of the former in Ming Dynasty, the version of Tongzhitang Jingjie in Qing Dynasty, and the version of the Si Ku Quan Shu, the authors find that Liji Jishuo used by Ruan Yuan is the version of Tongzhitang Jingjie which had been altered significantly, but not the version of Song Dynasty.
阮元 / 《十三经注疏校勘记》 / 《礼记集说》 / 版本 {{custom_keyword}} /
Ruan Yuan / Collation of the Notes and Commentaries on the Thirteen Classics / Liji Jishuo / version {{custom_keyword}} /
[1][清]朱华临.重校宋本十三经注疏跋[C]//十三经注疏[M].北京:中华书局影印本,1980:4. [2][3][4][6][7][8][9][10][12][13][16][21][22][23][24][25][26][27][清]阮元.十三经注疏附校勘记[M].中华书局影印本,1980:1247上栏,1247中栏,1263上栏,1272上栏,1272中栏,1402下栏,1430上栏,1509下栏,1472上栏,501上栏,1540上栏,1247上栏,1272下栏,1280上栏,1308下栏,1436上栏,1247上栏,1286下栏. [5][清]逸周书.卷六[M]//文渊阁四库全书本. [11][清]孙希旦.礼记集解[M]卷三十一.中华书局影印本,1989:856. [14][晋]郭象.庄子[M]//文渊阁四库全书本.台北:台湾商务印书馆,1987. [15][战国]韩非子[M].上海:上海古籍出版社,1989:154. [17][宋]卫湜.宝庆二年跋语[C]//礼记集说[M].//中华再造善本.北京:北京图书馆出版社,2003. [18]礼记集说提要[C]//四库全书总目提要.中华书局影印本,1965:169. [19][宋]卫湜.宝庆二年自序[C]//礼记集说[M].//中华再造善本,北京:北京图书馆出版社,2003. [20][宋]卫湜.嘉熙四年续跋[C]//礼记集说[M].//中华再造善本.北京:北京图书馆出版社,2003. [28]李学勤主编;龚抗云整理;王文锦审定.礼记正义[M].北京:北京大学出版社,1999. [29]喻遂生等校点.礼记正义[M].海口:海南国际新闻出版中心,1997.
/
〈 |
|
〉 |